Alan Stonebraker/American Physical Society Posted on 12/04/2013 8:21:43 AM PST by Red Badger
Quantum entanglement, a perplexing phenomenon of quantum mechanics that Albert Einstein once referred to as “spooky action at a distance,” could be even spookier than Einstein perceived.
Physicists at the University of Washington and Stony Brook University in New York believe the phenomenon might be intrinsically linked with wormholes, hypothetical features of space-time that in popular science fiction can provide a much-faster-than-light shortcut from one part of the universe to another.
But here’s the catch: One couldn’t actually travel, or even communicate, through these wormholes, said Andreas Karch, a UW physics professor.
Quantum entanglement occurs when a pair or a group of particles interact in ways that dictate that each particle’s behavior is relative to the behavior of the others. In a pair of entangled particles, if one particle is observed to have a specific spin, for example, the other particle observed at the same time will have the opposite spin.
The “spooky” part is that, as past research has confirmed, the relationship holds true no matter how far apart the particles are – across the room or across several galaxies. If the behavior of one particle changes, the behavior of both entangled particles changes simultaneously, no matter how far away they are.
Recent research indicated that the characteristics of a wormhole are the same as if two black holes were entangled, then pulled apart. Even if the black holes were on opposite sides of the universe, the wormhole would connect them.
Black holes, which can be as small as a single atom or many times larger than the sun, exist throughout the universe, but their gravitational pull is so strong that not even light can escape from them.
If two black holes were entangled, Karch said, a person outside the opening of one would not be able to see or communicate with someone just outside the opening of the other.
“The way you can communicate with each other is if you jump into your black hole, then the other person must jump into his black hole, and the interior world would be the same,” he said.
The work demonstrates an equivalence between quantum mechanics, which deals with physical phenomena at very tiny scales, and classical geometry – “two different mathematical machineries to go after the same physical process,” Karch said. The result is a tool scientists can use to develop broader understanding of entangled quantum systems.
“We’ve just followed well-established rules people have known for 15 years and asked ourselves, ‘What is the consequence of quantum entanglement?’”
Karch is a co-author of a paper describing the research, published in November in Physical Review Letters. Kristan Jensen of Stony Brook, a coauthor, did the work while at the University of Victoria, Canada. Funding came from the U.S. Department of Energy and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.
For more information, contact Karch at 206-543-8591 or akarch@uw.edu
Alan Stonebraker/American Physical Society
This illustration demonstrates a wormhole connecting two black holes.
I see you’ve been petting Schroedinger’s Cat.
If the entangled particles are traveling at the speed of light (photons), time and distance doesn’t exists for them in their reference frame, they’re still in contact with each other.
+++++++++++++++
I agree with you on that. OTOH I see very little discussion of the implications of this viewpoint.
Hmmmmm... how do they 'create' this entanglement?
If the entangled pairs are 'created', then it's not really proof of any natural occurrence, is it ?
Also their claim that one of the pair could be 'here', and the other somewhere billions of miles away out in the Universe... also precludes any possible 'proof'.
“Hmmmmm... how do they ‘create’ this entanglement?”
Different methods. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_entanglement#Methods_of_creating_entanglement
“If the entangled pairs are ‘created’, then it’s not really proof of any natural occurrence, is it ?”
They can be created by us, but they are also created routinely by natural processes. For example, in any atom that has more than one electron in an orbital, there is a natural entanglement.
“Also their claim that one of the pair could be ‘here’, and the other somewhere billions of miles away out in the Universe... also precludes any possible ‘proof’.”
Yes, obviously we can’t directly observe any entanglement of that distance, so that type of talk is probably just extrapolation. Quantum mechanics is non-local, so a vast distance like that has no effect on an entanglement.
They can be created by us, but they are also created routinely by natural processes. For example, in any atom that has more than one electron in an orbital, there is a natural entanglement.
One would naturally assume that to be the case. Being part of an 'atom', those parts should have some kind of 'link' to each other.
Yes, obviously we can’t directly observe any entanglement of that distance, so that type of talk is probably just extrapolation. Quantum mechanics is non-local, so a vast distance like that has no effect on an entanglement.
How do we know it has no effect, if we can't measure or prove it ?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
