Posted on 10/29/2013 11:44:52 PM PDT by Kimberly GG
....."The Left is champing at the bit to go single payer, even before Obama Care has begun. The employer mandate has been delayed and thousands of exemptions have been granted. Of the major provisions, only the individual mandate and fines remain, and even they may be delayed. But the liberals say: Lets change the venue and the rules before the game even starts."....
(Excerpt) Read more at forbes.com ...
TYVM, I’ve asked the Admin to fix it.
they are creating the crisis so that they can then force thru a ‘solution’ they could never under normal conditions, ever hope to implement.
Exactly! Trust me...they believe they’re going to have the last laugh about this...MANY of them already are! They LOVE seeing us throw hissy fits about this, because they know where it’s leading.
Of COURSE they never read the bill...they didn’t need to. OF COURSE they gave billions to their friends to build a FAILED system ... they didn’t need a system that worked. Of COURSE they lied about ALL OF IT.
My thoughts though....would run of the mill democrats be supportive of a BUSHCARE or a SINGLE PAYER system under BUSH or any other Republican...Palincare, Cruzcare? NO!!
The ONLY reason they are okay with this is because they BELIEVE the POTUS will remain a DEMOCRAT. Whether it be Obama again, or Hillary, or some other socialist puppet ... they’re going to get their AMNESTY in order to do it and WE ARE ALL SCREWED.
Completely disagree. Even the mainstream media is now reporting the ACA’s complete ineptitude. After this, the cry isn’t going to be for single-payer, it’s going to be for the government to keep its hands off health care completely.
They chose, badly.
A move to single payer insurance would have to pass through Congress and would probably be tested before the Supreme Court.
Thank you Cynwoody for providing a working link for Kimberlygg for the article she posted from Forbes.
KimberlyGG, please do not use a search link in place of a direct link. Also do not use any link with embedded redirect code, where the link appears as a link to one site, but instead then re-directs anyone who happens to click the link.
The link which you used
resulted in re-directing anyone who clicked on the link to a strange search page located on Yahoo.
Earlier tonight, you also posted a similar search link which redirected to another strange search page:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3085297/posts?page=32#32
If you wish to post published material from another site, only use a direct working link which goes to the article on the original site of publication.
Thank you.
I think research of what is contained in Obamacare would already show that to be their agenda.
Hasn’t Obama surrounded himself with people who’ve already written about population control?
Thank you. I apologize...both links were meant to direct to the same article and I didn’t realize they weren’t doing so. I will be more careful.
Why would anyone want the same incompetents who cannot even operate a web site to be in charge of your individual health care?
Okay. Thanks.
lets stop giving in to their corruption of the language
SINGLE PAYER = GOVERNMENT HEALTH CARE
” Liberalism is a mental disease..
Liberalism gives psychotics an identity.
“DON’T BE FOOLED ... OBAMACARE WAS DESIGNED TO FAIL. SINGLE PAYER IS WHAT THEY WANTED ALL ALONG.”
Exactly. This plan is working PERFECTLY. It is crashing private healthcare insurance industry and that was its only goal.
Well repeal the bad law, you don’t double down on stupid.
I agree. But I think TOTAL CONTROL is more important to progressives than quality of care or shortages of doctors/hospitals. We have examples of how bad the systems in England and Canada are. They don’t care.
“I’m all for a single payer system eventually. I think that (what) we have to do is work with what we’ve got until we close the gap.”
SEBELIUS, 2007
“I think that the idea of moving towards a single payer system could very well make sense.”
OBAMA, 2009
What were trying to do is insure everybody, right? Were trying to insure more people, not less and so its my feeling that the rising costs that are going on will not be solved by getting rid of peoples health insurance—that throws them into emergency rooms and charity and other things. Thats why HR 676 [SINGLE PAYER] is our ultimate solution—is that everybodys insured from birth on and thats what were still fighting for.
Do you see a single-payer health care system ultimately in the United States?...”Universal health care—well, every industrial country on the planet already has a universal system of health care. When asked if he thinks President Obama’s health-care law will lead to a single-payer health-care system in the U.S., he said: Well its a platform. I dont think they flow smoothly but without that, if we didnt have this then health care, universal health care would be an even more difficult legislative objective.
JOHN CONYERS, 2011
“What we’ve done with Obamacare is have a step in the right direction, but we’re far from having something that’s going to work forever.”
When then asked by panelist Steve Sebelius whether he meant ultimately the country would have to have a health care system that abandoned insurance as the means of accessing it, “Yes, yes. Absolutely, yes.”
HARRY REID 2013
This time it’s different. America can make socialism work perfectly. /s
I have said this for a long time now. We can’t continue to use the definitions of the enemy and expect to win a majority. It is even more accurately called “government monopolized health control”. It really has nothing to do with healthcare.
Another example is the word “capitalism” which is a Marxist definition. In reality the free market is not just another “-ism”, but the opposite. It is freedom.
If they manage to take down the country and kill us off then we were the idiots all along.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.