Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sen. Edward Markey calls for FCC to intervene in CBS, TWC dispute
Los Angeles Times ^ | August 6, 2013 | Ryan Faughnder

Posted on 08/06/2013 7:38:13 PM PDT by EveningStar

Customers have been calling on Time Warner Cable and CBS Corp. to resolve their ongoing carriage dispute that has resulted in channels going dark in several markets including Los Angeles and New York.

Now politicians are demanding an end to the blackout.

Sen. Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.), who recently won John F. Kerry's Senate seat, on Tuesday asked the Federal Communications Commission to step in and restart negotiations.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: blackout; cbs; communist; dictatorship; fcc; markey; timewarner; timewarnercable

1 posted on 08/06/2013 7:38:13 PM PDT by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Stunning!


2 posted on 08/06/2013 7:45:19 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
You can take away our freedom, but DON'T YOU DARE TAKE AWAY OUR FAVORITE SHOWS!
3 posted on 08/06/2013 7:52:46 PM PDT by ThomasSawyer (Democratic Underground: Proof that anyone can figure out how to use a computer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Oh, thank you SO much MA...
Ou guys are looking more and more like CA with the certified loonies you elect.


4 posted on 08/06/2013 7:55:09 PM PDT by matginzac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

I thought cable was not subject to FCC control?


5 posted on 08/06/2013 8:01:27 PM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Oh it ok if CBS gets the time Warner death penalty. The prezzy is on Leno tonight not Letterman.


6 posted on 08/06/2013 8:04:34 PM PDT by ncfool (Obama's aMeriKa 2012 The land of entitlement for the 51% crowd.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Red states should tax the liberal media — let’s have a 20 percent surcharge on tv advertising.

I think this is a message even the liberal media would understand.


7 posted on 08/06/2013 8:18:19 PM PDT by o2bfree (Lindsey Graham is left of South Carolina.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA

The bigger question is what part of the FCC’s charter would cover this situation? If there was lewd video or 4-letter words.....maybe. But can the FCC force a cable company to carry a network, and the obvious answer is no. For CBS, the amount of money they were making off the cable guys in this case....wasn’t that substantial....but it makes me think they are are on some marginal profit situation currently, and can’t survive without that money.


8 posted on 08/06/2013 8:54:01 PM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

ALL of the ‘old media’ is in a tailspin. Look at the past week alone, the Boston Globe sells for $70M, pennies on the dollar of sales price when NYT bought 20 years ago. Then WaPo goes for $250M vs the $B+ it was valued at not too long ago. I can see the NYT going next. The networks are bleeding viewers, so their values have also declined.

But I don’t see the FCC having ANY jurisdiction in this matter. But then, again, Markey IS from MA.


9 posted on 08/06/2013 9:06:30 PM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

The first time one of these cable giants caved and agreed to pay rights fees for a signal they could get for free over the air set a very bad precedent. Ever since then, this nonsense goes on like clockwork.


10 posted on 08/06/2013 9:08:09 PM PDT by OrangeHoof (Howdy to all you government agents spying on me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

Actually, there is a tiny bit of muscle involved here. There are FCC rules regarding local channels, and (ugh) lifeline service. But I do really mean a little bit. Does a cable company have to carry EVERY local channel? The answer before has been no from the FCC, so they couldn’t do something silly like ordering TWC to carry CBS.

The biggest sticking point is that CBS wants TWC to pay the same amount per estimated viewer that it does for other cable channels. Which would make local re-broadcast be one of the most expensive channels for TWC. To ‘sweeten the deal’, CBS has offered to lower prices on other channels. In the end, of course, it greatly increases the price.

TWC replied, fine, we’ll do that, but we get to put our own ads in, just like they would on another channel. CBS balked at this and said NO WAY! TWC then replied then if it is just the re-broadcast of the channel, unmodified, then you’re not getting any money more.

And that’s where the dispute sits. CBS wants more money, TWC said sure, but we get to put commercials in, CBS said no to that, TWC said no to the higher rates and dropped the channels as the temporary contract continuation has ended. CBS could be on TWC tonight, all CBS would have to do is go back to letting the contract extend until the debate is ironed out.

But what is not going to happen is what CBS wants - higher rates with no TWC sourced commercials. And any negotiator who steps in is going to agree with them. Because at the end of the day, the bottom tier of customer, that cable lifeline customer, leaves zero overhead for the rates that CBS wants, especially since everyone else is going to go for the same deal.


11 posted on 08/06/2013 9:16:18 PM PDT by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kingu

The time to stop CBS’s s*** was when it telecast Dan Rather’s fraudulent smear against President Bush’s honorable veteran’s record. The network used fraud to unseat a President. The Feds should have stripped their licences and auctioned their frequencies and imprisoned the executives and the news staff.


12 posted on 08/06/2013 10:30:18 PM PDT by namvolunteer (Obama says the US is subservient to the UN and the Constitution does not apply. That is treason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

But can the FCC force a cable company to carry a network, and the obvious answer is no.
*************************
Time Warner didn’t cut off CBS. CBS pulled the plug in major markets like NYC, LA and DFW, as they are asking for a 600% increase in fees from TWC.

Pisses me off, as I like weekend golf on CBS, Friday night Texas Ranger games, Big Brother and Survivor.


13 posted on 08/06/2013 10:53:23 PM PDT by octex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: octex

Under Clinton the FCC did force them to carry channels like Current-TV, Democracy Now! etc


14 posted on 08/06/2013 10:55:50 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: OrangeHoof

So many lawyers.... So much time!

We pay ALL the freight because WE ride the trains.


15 posted on 08/06/2013 11:18:27 PM PDT by Bullish (Psalm 46)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson