Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nate Silver Predicts GOP Holding 50-51 Senate Seats After 2014 Election
TPM ^ | July 15, 2013

Posted on 07/15/2013 3:19:14 PM PDT by SMGFan

Following former Gov. Brian Schweitzer's decision not to run for Montana’s open U.S. Senate seat this weekend, New York Times polling guru Nate Silver predicted Monday that Republicans will hold 50 to 51 seats in the upper chamber after all ballots are counted in the 2014 Congressional mid-term elections.

(Excerpt) Read more at livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Montana
KEYWORDS: brianschweitzer; maxbaucus; montana; natesilver; newyorkslimes; newyorktimes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: Reddon

I agree. Who cares? The GOP is proving to be even more deceptive than the Dems in some ways. Rubio, Ryan, and Boehnor don’t even have the guts to shoot straight. At least the Dems are direct in their destructive plans.


21 posted on 07/15/2013 3:53:12 PM PDT by vmivol00 (I won't be reconstructed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan
"Romney with over 300 EV's!"

...said just about everyone in 2012

22 posted on 07/15/2013 3:58:23 PM PDT by FightforFreedomCA (...and I don't care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rawhide

“How did this guy do last election predicting the results?”

Nate Silver did a great job predicting the results. At least he doesn’t use liberal New Math despite working for the Old Gray Whore :-).

There was a Freeper (forget his name) that did a similar analysis and arrived at almost the same results as Silver (I think they were only a bit off in NC).


23 posted on 07/15/2013 4:03:12 PM PDT by edh (I need a better tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FightforFreedomCA
...said just about everyone in 2012

Not Nate Silver.

24 posted on 07/15/2013 4:05:01 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

50 or 51 seats? Big deal.

In order to have any kind of assurance that the GOP would prevail on any given piece of legislation, it would require 65 or more seats.

Remember how they were bamboozled into “sharing” power when they were in the ‘majority’ by one seat?

And consider the number of RINOs already in the Senate, ready to play kissy-face with the DEMs on the other side of the aisle.

The GOP senators are too stupid, and lack the resolve to be able to handle being the majority party.


25 posted on 07/15/2013 4:45:25 PM PDT by DJ Frisat ((optional, printed after my name on post))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saganite

He was fed internal polling data from the obama campaign.


26 posted on 07/15/2013 4:54:51 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

C’mon, Harry. Kill the filibuster. Then we can repeal Obamacare with 51 votes.


27 posted on 07/15/2013 5:05:37 PM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer

and it was accurate


28 posted on 07/15/2013 5:14:32 PM PDT by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan
New York Times polling guru Nate Silver predicted Monday that Republicans will hold 50 to 51 seats in the upper chamber after all ballots are counted in the 2014 Congressional mid-term elections.

And after all ballots are counted twice, three times or as many times as necessary, Democrats will hold 52 seats.

29 posted on 07/15/2013 5:15:57 PM PDT by Colonel_Flagg (Army dad. And damned proud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

Need 60 without RINOs


30 posted on 07/15/2013 5:52:03 PM PDT by Old Yeller (Goodbye America. Glad the majority of my years were spent during the good days.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

What difference does it make?


31 posted on 07/15/2013 5:52:07 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Who knew that one day professional wrestling would be less fake than professional journalism?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


32 posted on 07/15/2013 8:18:05 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (McCain or Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

51 with Senate Rule changes put in by RATS works just fine.


33 posted on 07/15/2013 9:01:57 PM PDT by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson