Skip to comments.A Defense Of Weiner’s Supposedly Homophobic Moment
Posted on 06/22/2013 11:14:51 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
This country just keeps getting crazier and crazier.
First was the remarkable decision to give President Clinton the duty of introducing President Obama at the Democratic National Convention in an election in which the Democrats made vaginas the focal pointand was successful at wooing the country with his speech. Heck, even I thought it was a fantastic speech, even if it was complete bull.
Then we heard the Obama administrations decision to give as-yet-unspecified aid to Syrian rebels, who boast al-Qaeda as members, in order to help end a battle in which Americas enemies and Israels enemies are killing each other.
And now, I am about to defend disgraced former Congressman Anthony Weiner, who, as the world knows, tweeted pictures of his namesake and his misshapen pectorals to a woman who was not his wife and flirted with underage girls over Twitter, a.k.a. The Career Killer.
Except that that Twitter incident did not so much kill Weiners career as it did put it into a brief coma. After yanking us around and denying the charges, he finally gave in and ejected his congressional seat prematurely.
But what seedy politician can resist the seduction of the possibility of more power? Now is the time of the Second Coming of Weiner, who had the brass to run for New York City Mayor, for which he is currently campaigning.
Weiners opponent is a lesbian; this is important to know. When he was out gathering signatures to put him on the ballot, he approached an elderly woman and asked if she was a registered Democrat. The woman said, I am, and added, and Im not voting for, uh, whats her name? The dyke.
So Weiner said, Okay, I just need you to sign the petition to get me on the ballot. Then he noticed the offended look on a reporters face who was present, so Weiner decided to pretend to care that the woman used the word dyke. And you really shouldnt talk that way about people, he told her.
Now Weiner is being attacked by two Democratic supporters of his opponent because he showed a lack of moral courage for not immediately chastising the old woman in public rather than only doing so a few seconds later when he realized it would look bad if he didnt.
This is what gets me mad. Liberal politicians believe that it is their duty to correct civilization, and, on a smaller scale, to correct individuals behavior. It is not Weiners business to tell people what they should or shouldnt say. Its none of his business. Thats not his job. People can say whatever they want. But Democrats think its their moral obligation to change people to fit more with their own standard.
Pathetically, Weiner has apologized for doing nothing when Democrats felt he should have publicly reprimanded this poor woman. He has even tried to grovel to his opponent as a form of penance, but she wouldnt pick up the phone.
Whether people should or shouldnt say things is nobodys business but the individuals in question. Democratsseriouslymind your ever-lovin business.
Yes, Weiner should have sent her to the gulag. Is this really the choice in New York? Someone who thinks two females are sexually complimentary or a pervert?
I’m betting that will be THE choice in New York. The Republian candidate might as well not be running.
“Whether people should or shouldnt say things is nobodys business but the individuals in question. Democratsseriouslymind your ever-lovin business.”
Both of my recent Fortune 500 employers have in place “anti-condoner” policies. If somebody says something that isn’t PC, perhaps tells a joke which “a bystander ‘might’ find offensive,” they are REQUIRED to challenge that person immediately or face the same penalty that speaker might face, which could include being written-up or fired.
Two females that are sexually complimentary, a pervert, and a RINO walk into a bar.....
only need two names for this; graham and mccain. they fit all the criteria.
“Two females that are sexually complimentary, a pervert, and a RINO walk into a bar.....”
There must be a way to turn this into a “Weiner in the dyke” joke.
That was a great reply! Actually makes a pretty good joke.
I think homos are heterophobic.
Huma, as “First Lady” will be the moslem’s “cherry on top”.
Why would Weiner have a homophobic moment?
He is, after all, married to a lesbian.
Weiners opponent is a lesbian; this is important to know. When he was out gathering signatures to put him on the ballot, he approached an elderly woman and asked if she was a registered Democrat. The woman said, "I am," and added, "and Im not voting for, uh, whats her name? The dyke."Well, it did used to be New Amsterdam.
So Weiner said, "Okay, I just need you to sign the petition to get me on the ballot." Then he noticed the offended look on a reporters face who was present, so Weiner decided to pretend to care that the woman used the word "dyke." "And you really shouldnt talk that way about people," he told her.If that had been a real New Yorker, she'd have said, "f- you and your f'ing petition, a-hole!"
There is a contested Republican primary involving two men, both of whom are believed to be heterosexual males without history of perverse sexual antics.