Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama does not feel Americans' privacy violated: chief of staff
Reuters via Yahoo News ^ | June 16, 2013 | Reuters

Posted on 06/16/2013 12:40:25 PM PDT by John W

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama does not believe the recently disclosed top-secret National Security Agency surveillance of phone records and Internet data has violated Americans' privacy rights, his chief of staff said on Sunday.

The administration has said the top-secret collection of massive amounts of "metadata" from phone calls - raw information that does not identify individual telephone subscribers, was legal and authorized by Congress in the interests of thwarting militant attacks. It has said the agencies did not monitor calls.

Asked whether Obama feels he has violated the privacy of Americans, McDonough said, "He does not."

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: benghazi; fastandfurious; impeachnow; irs; mcdonough; metadata; nsa; obamansa; privacy; spying; warantless; wiretaps
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

1 posted on 06/16/2013 12:40:25 PM PDT by John W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: John W

Justice Department Expands Hunt for Data on Cellphones

Cellphones seem to be increasingly attractive to the Department of Justice, documents obtained by the American Civil Liberties Union show. Agencies affiliated with the department used more than 37,600 court orders in 2011 to gather cellphone data, a sharp increase from previous years. They were almost equally divided between “pen register” data, which captures outgoing phone numbers, and “trap and trace” orders, which refer to incoming phone numbers, which means one phone could have two separate orders associated with it.
The total number has roughly doubled since 2007, when cellphone communications were more limited.

By law, the data can be obtained without a search warrant establishing probable cause, though the authorities do need to tell a court that it is relevant to an investigation. To get a wiretap that allows authorities to actually listen in on the contents of a call has higher legal barriers; law enforcement officials have to convince an impartial judge of probable cause.

(Excerpt)

http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/11/26/justice-department-expands-hunt-for-data-on-cellphones/

Obama’s NSA eavesdropping goes beyond that of Bush... after campaigning on the promise of: “ No warrantless wiretaps if you elect me!”

http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-9845595-7.html

headlines read: “NSA Exceeds Legal Limits In Eavesdropping Program”, “ U.S. phone intercepts go beyond legal limits” , and “NSA Found Improperly Spying on Americans”.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123985123667923961.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

http://uk.reuters.com/article/burningIssues/idUKTRE53F09820090416

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/04/15/justice-dept-nsa-improperly-spied-americans/


2 posted on 06/16/2013 12:43:28 PM PDT by TurboZamboni (Marx smelled bad & lived with his parents most his life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John W

I’ve heard the claim that only 300 phones were monitored and that it stopped attacks (without knowing the content of the calls).

I call double bullstalin. It was a data sweep of all customers and mere “networking” of who’s contacting whom does not stop attacks.

But it does help build the type of voter database that Maxine Waters blabbed about in 2012.


3 posted on 06/16/2013 12:43:53 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John W

Of course he doesn’t.

Wonder if NSA taps his phones.


4 posted on 06/16/2013 12:44:08 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John W
Of course he doesn't.

OTOH, his Blackberry was specially modified to prevent eavesdropping.

5 posted on 06/16/2013 12:45:00 PM PDT by null and void (Republicans create the tools of opression, and the democrats gleefully use them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John W

Obama is a liar!


6 posted on 06/16/2013 12:45:22 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John W
From the comments posted at Yahoo, this isn't going over very well with the commoners.
7 posted on 06/16/2013 12:46:58 PM PDT by Excellence (9/11 was an act of faith.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John W

8 posted on 06/16/2013 12:47:47 PM PDT by LyinLibs (If victims of islam were more "islamophobic," maybe they'd still be alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John W


9 posted on 06/16/2013 12:49:21 PM PDT by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John W

He doesn’t have to— he has Valerie Jarrett in the office next door, same set of buttons.


10 posted on 06/16/2013 12:49:46 PM PDT by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excellence

One thing about Yahoo is that they are choc full of libs there. I know a few people who work there in Santa Monica close to me, and they’ve got Odumbo stickers all over the place. The thing that peeves them is that the comments are mostly from anti-obama e-mail holders. Same thing with the LA Times.


11 posted on 06/16/2013 12:49:49 PM PDT by max americana (fired liberals in our company after the election, & laughed while they cried (true story))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: John W

ring ring

ObamaPhone. How can I snoop on ya today?

uhhh,, when will my oysters Rockafellar arrive?

soon, my dear, soon.


12 posted on 06/16/2013 12:50:21 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi --)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John W

Obama does not feel Americans have any privacy. Or constitutional rights. They are dhimmis.


13 posted on 06/16/2013 12:50:34 PM PDT by Hardraade (http://junipersec.wordpress.com (Obama equals Osama))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

Speaking of databases, remember that 0bama brought the 2010 census from Commerce to the White House. Now there is a database!


14 posted on 06/16/2013 12:51:02 PM PDT by Excellence (9/11 was an act of faith.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: John W
Obama does not feel Americans' privacy violated

Says the man who sealed all his records.

15 posted on 06/16/2013 12:51:18 PM PDT by MamaTexan (I am a Person as defined by the Law of Nature, not a 'person' as defined by the laws of Man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John W

That’s because he doesn’t believe you have any privacy or a right to any.


16 posted on 06/16/2013 12:51:41 PM PDT by yuleeyahoo (Liberty is not collective, it is personal. All liberty is individual liberty. - Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John W

We have met the Obama Administration, and found where al-Qa’ida is hiding. America surrenders.


17 posted on 06/16/2013 12:52:14 PM PDT by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

It was probably modified to eavesdrop.


18 posted on 06/16/2013 12:53:45 PM PDT by Hardraade (http://junipersec.wordpress.com (Obama equals Osama))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: max americana
The thing that peeves them is that the comments are mostly from anti-obama e-mail holders. Same thing with the LA Times.

Like ME! :-D. Yeah. I love going through the comments that are usually 90-95% anti-der Fuerher. I hope it tweeks the hell out of all those libs!!

19 posted on 06/16/2013 12:55:12 PM PDT by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: John W

Of course he doesn’t. In Newspeak “privacy” means “murdering your unborn child” and is a right only women are accorded.


20 posted on 06/16/2013 12:57:31 PM PDT by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson