Skip to comments.The Most Horrible Thing About Late Term Abortion
Posted on 05/03/2013 3:38:15 PM PDT by Cindy of Nashville
There is an aspect of the Gosnell Abortion/Murder trial that no one is mentioning. It is also why it is so important to know that our worshiped President is okay with what Gosnell did. DOESN'T OBAMA AND EVERYBODY ELSE WHO SUPPORTS LATE TERM ABORTION REALIZE THAT DEVELOPED BABIES FEEL PAIN. The horrible things he was doing to these babies was without any anesthetic. Imagine having your spine cut, your feet cut off and who knows what else, with no pain killer. We go after other countries for human rights violations, we send people to jail for cruelty to animals, liberals act like waterboarding is so awful, but even our own president is okay with torture and murder to viable babies. An abortion in the first 2 months of pregnecy is one thing, but when the baby is developed and able to feel pain and live without the mother, that is another thing. I have to force myself to not think about this Gosnell trial, otherwise it makes me sick. I hope there are others who realize the horror in all this.
NO! The most horrible thing is not that the baby feels pain,
It is that the most helpless, innocent, and sinless (not without sin nature, but not having committed sins) of all humans is torturously murdered.
I have said this in another post.
One of the barbaric things about Late Term Abortion is the idea that you can do anything you want to human life as long as it is behind the cervical line. This allows them to expose the spinal column out far enough so it can be snipped in the upper neck with shears. This is done to insure the baby is dead before it crosses the cervical line.
As long as people position themselves with this legalism, they have as much credibility as those who believe that women are unclean during their menstrual periods and must be kept from physical contact during that period.
A good post with solid observations.
Miss Cindy, abortion is horrible.
The most innocent among us the “least of these” are being tortured and murdered for the joy of the left.
Killing human beings, even tiny ones, is a messy business.
To me the most horrible thing is not that the child can feel pain, but that we as a society do not.
On one side of the cervical wall murder is ok, on the other side it is not..........
and the left celebrates, holding galas, fundraisers and the president asks an unknown god to bless this action.
My spirit weeps for these innocents.
Thanks for posting.
Apparently, the abortion crowd doesn’t care about babies feeling pain when they’re being put to death. It only bothers the commie libs if MURDERERS feel pain when they are being put to death.
You have fallen into a trap.
Pain is irrelevant.
A born baby faces a life of joy and a life of pain. What is most horrible is that the life of the baby means nothing to the abortionist or the abortion industry. They don't give a damn whether the baby feels pain or terror or nothing at all. If pain is the most horrible part of an abortion, the doctor can easily administer a general anesthetic to the baby and claim that the baby feels no pain.
What is horrible is that the procedure ends a life. An innocent life. A life that was given by God and taken away by people with evil intent.
Painless abortions still kill innocent children. Every abortion stops a beating heart. Those who perform such procedures clearly have no heart. Only a psychopath could become an abortionist, and the US Supreme Court has given every psychopath with a medical license, the license to commit serial murder on a scale that would make Ted Bundy look like an angel.
If Ted Bundy had adminstered general anesthesia to all his victims before strangling them, would it have made his crimes any less abominable? I think not.
Several states have passed pain-capable unborn child protection laws. For more information check out the National Right to Life Committee website.
We know that abortion is all or nothing. If a baby has intrinsic value as a human you cannot say it is valuable at 12 weeks but not 11-1/2. Unfortunately, sometimes you have to use incrementalism to move the needle to where it should be. If you can get them to acknowledge that they do not have the right to painfully torture an unborn baby, it may enlighten them a little. Once they admit the fetus has enough worth to consider whether it feels pain, they might have to think about it. Incrementalism is not ideal, but the left has been using it quite successfully to meet their goals.
“DOESN’T OBAMA AND EVERYBODY ELSE WHO SUPPORTS LATE TERM ABORTION REALIZE THAT DEVELOPED BABIES FEEL PAIN”
The most horrible thing is that THEY don’t care that babies feel pain and even celebrate them doing so.
There is no moment, only a process.
I could never do it, but I used to believe it was a wiman’s choice. When the scales were on my eyes, no amount of horrific pictures, impassioned writing, or lecturing reached me. I tuned it all out. Did not want to believe that viable children were being killed. Thought it must be a ine in a million rarity. I focused on the wants and needs of the impoverished mother instead of those of the child. Only a grace-filled radical spiritual awakening snapped me out of it. Perhaps the prayers of someone like you. I agree 100% that the problem starts with the contraceptive mentality. But when you say that to people, it is like you are from a different planet. EVEN to many Catholics. How many big Catholic families do you see in church unless its a TLM? You have to reach people where they are, however you can.
That said, I like what you wrote on your next post: compromise is not just a fool's errand, but Satan's, too. Years ago I had a similar discussion with the then-president of the National Right to Life Committee. She said that she would rather "compromise" and save a few lives than stick to the basics and watch 100% of babies being slaughtered. Tough choice!
It isn’t Obama and it isn’t Gosnell, for Gosnell it is money, for Obama it is power and votes. It is the woman who walks into an abortion clinic, swollen with child and feeling movements of life inside her. They are the animals, only they are responsible for these deaths. In fact, there should be a clause in the procedure agreement, that if the baby is born alive, the live infant is given to her and it becomes the responsibility of the mother to slit the baby’s spine.
Still, perhaps this argument will be understood by some pro-abortion types who cannot make the tiny mental leap required to understand that a fetus is fully human.
There is no soul entering the body, not piecemeal or otherwise. There is no “stage” where we are nothing (using your definition of humanity). There is simply a process of sperm entering the egg. There is a stage where it has not entered and a stage where the sperm and egg are fused and the DNA has been combined. We can also hypothesize various partial fusion stages.
Oh but the soul/spirit intellect does indeed enter the womb at conception. Each and every soul/spirit intellect created has the opportunity to take this flesh journey. Christ said just to 'see' the kingdom of God this flesh journey was the first step.
Now it is also Written that when the flesh body dies that soul/spirit intellect returns to the Maker that sent it. Thus every conception wherein a soul/spirit intellect enters the womb is not lost when the flesh dies, but back with the Maker.
However, the big business of murdering the child still in the womb is not ignored by the Creator.
Your post is very profound! And true.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.