Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RNC ELDERS DETERMINE CONSERVATIVE 'PURITY' COSTS GOP ELECTIONS
Breitbart.com ^ | 18 Mar 2013 | by MATTHEW BOYLE

Posted on 03/18/2013 9:42:03 AM PDT by TexasCajun

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last
To: TexasCajun

The professional begin an election assuming x votes from the base and then decide how to build on that.

What they haven’t yet realized is they have no base anymore. They start with 0 votes every election and every vote has to be earned. Zero Based Electioneering.


61 posted on 03/18/2013 11:11:10 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swamprebel
The last two elections were 2012 and 2010. We won 2010 overwhelmingly ~ and much of the victory was due to the Traditionalists and the TEAParty factions.

We lost our shirt in 2012, and every bit of that loss was due to the GOP-e and the Rockefeller Republicans (who failed to turn out to vote).

62 posted on 03/18/2013 11:11:38 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: cdcdawg
In a two party system you have two choices ~ there's no such thing as an Independent in the system ~ just a thin film ~ a fringe ~ outside of the two major coalition parties.

I am sure Romney won the Independents ~ that's who he went for. He lost. So much for Independents.

63 posted on 03/18/2013 11:13:25 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Quote: “There are many more examples of the willfull undermining of conservatives by the establishment types. We must have a big tent, they say, but no conservatives must enter, and should they elbow their way in, they are to be ridiculed and marginalized, as Johnson, Paul, Rubio, Cruz, Lee, etc. are.”

Oh no, they were maligned when they were running but now, suddenly, the RINO’s act like some of these guys are rising stars who the GOPe has been behind all along. I mean, they are kissing Rubio’s arse now but did everything to stop him when he was running against their man Charlie Crist.


64 posted on 03/18/2013 11:28:35 AM PDT by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Exactly. The RNC ran their perfect candidate, and he ran a pretty decent campaign; at least much better than McCain’s. Romney’s a nice guy, he has the right hair, he’s tall, he’s moderate, he’s qualified, he’s non-threatening, no skeletons in the closet, etc... He still lost because the Republican base stayed home. Out of all that the RNC discerns that they need to reach out more to the middle. Unbelievable, yet totally expected.


65 posted on 03/18/2013 11:34:35 AM PDT by cdcdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: cdcdawg
The Republican base is primarily Conservative or Traditionalist or Fiscally Responsible ~ they turned out. The Rockefeller Republicans were still showing up for Bush, then when McCain came around they disappeared, and they stayed away for Romney as well.

You'd think they'd vote for their one of their own crowd but they didn't.

I think this relates to their dispute with the Reagan factions when they didn't pick Rockefeller to run after Ford. It was his turn, of course. Here was a Romney and it was 'his turn' too and they abandoned him out of pique. Same with McCain.

Time to cut that crowd loose.

66 posted on 03/18/2013 11:41:25 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: FlipWilson

Well, these people are not stupid. They know conservatives can win, that’s why they never want them nominated. And when they do win despite all the efforts to defeat them, they use them to keep their power and then work to defeat them later. Specter used Santorum to get reelected but then worked to get Santorum defeated. Hatch voted in lockstep with Mike Lee to get reelected. McConnell hired Paul’s campaign manager and is linking himself to Paul on hemp issues, etc. Cornyn is sticking by Cruz. McCain and Graham pulled Kelly Ayotte in with them on foreign policy and Marco Rubio on immigration. The conservatives are the real leaders and they know it.


67 posted on 03/18/2013 11:41:30 AM PDT by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: FlipWilson

Make no mistake. Marco Rubio is one of theirs. By birthright, JEB Bush may well be the champion of the elites and establishment in the republican party, but Rubio aspires to have his position. He wants to be one of them.

The GOPe can have him. No way I ever trust Rubio. He is a pretender.


68 posted on 03/18/2013 11:43:22 AM PDT by Waryone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

We are rancid with apologists right here on FR that scream ‘traitor’ and question the ‘patriotism’ of anyone refusing to keep empowering our political problem and it’s mad dash to the left.

What we really need is a purge of moderates and liberals from the conservative ranks. Claiming to be conservative and then demanding we accept homosexuality, abortion and a host of other ‘moderate’ positions is not conservative. Nor is campaigning for liberals.

I see Riese is bitching that purity is the problem. Well, the opposite of purity is CORRUPTION. So that is exactly what he’s going to get more of. And he seems good with that.

At this point, anyone willing to support the GOP is every bit the danger to America that the Dems/Libs are. Because they are supporting the same things via the GOP.


69 posted on 03/18/2013 11:45:50 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Is that really what happened? Moderate Republicans didn’t turn out for Romney? The numbers show that they didn’t vote for Obama in 2012. Why would they not turn out for their ultimate candidate? I’m not saying you’re wrong, I’m still trying to figure it out.


70 posted on 03/18/2013 11:46:11 AM PDT by cdcdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: cdcdawg
Because the margin of loss was so small ~ about 100,000 of the right votes in the right states and we'd won ~ we were expected to win in those states, and the "so called moderates" ~ to wit, the Rockefeller Republicans, do, in fact, have sufficient numbers to move the election results, but in the aggregate there aren't many of them.

Republican factions start out with powerhouse church attending Roman Catholics and Southern Baptists! The 'moderate' factions ~ both of them ~ are far smaller, but concentrated!

71 posted on 03/18/2013 11:51:50 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

What other conclusion could they possibly come to?
They are embarrassed by conservatives. They look down on them and consider them to be a bunch of hayseed country ****s. Whereas the DNC openly embraces the most radical Marxists and even promotes them to positions of authority.


72 posted on 03/18/2013 11:59:40 AM PDT by servo1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: manc
Come round here and noone wants that turd poking agenda, weaker defence, drugs

But folks round there do want drug profits hyperinflated to tens of billions of dollars and channeled into criminal and terrorist hands as the War on Drugs does?

73 posted on 03/18/2013 12:04:37 PM PDT by JustSayNoToNannies ("The Lord has removed His judgments against you" - Zep. 3:15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: JustSayNoToNannies

oh let me guess I think I remember you harping on about making marriage open for what ever and now do you want also to make all drugs legal?

Simple answer yes or no do you want heroin, LSD legal and di you want those who sell those drugs to open their shops anywhere including a school house because in your la la land Govt should nto tell anyone what to do or what they can sell or what they can marry?

Simple yes or no would suffice.

Oh and you are not a conservative you;re a libertarian, libera on social issues so why not go to the liberal conventions or do you as well?


74 posted on 03/18/2013 1:06:31 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun
Who the hell is promoting “purity”? Its a phony strawman. We are a long, long, long, long (did I say long?) ways from purity. In fact no one person's idea of purity would match not another person's. This site is proof of that. Its a phony argument made by RINOs trying to push their RINO agenda.

Was bob dole a pure conservative? John mccain? Mitt romney?

Maybe these geniuses should start with those three candidates and analyze what went wrong first before blaming purists whoever they are.

75 posted on 03/18/2013 1:08:02 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JustSayNoToNannies
You just can't argue with a drug warrior. No matter how many facts you present as to the drug wars astronomical failure, they simply refuse to see it. It makes me wonder how Prohibition ever got repealed. The level of drug violence today far exceeds that of Prohibition and yet public outrage is nonexistent. In fact, stories of the drug war are a staple of today's "entertainment".
76 posted on 03/18/2013 1:12:44 PM PDT by Scarlet Pimpernel (And what rough beast, its hour come round at last, Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706
In 2004, we were told to support Specter, he’s a republican and we need that seat, they said. So Toomey lost the primary to Specter and the conservatives were told to rally around the republican candiate “for the good of the party.” Two years later, Rick Santorum was up for reelection. Long a thorn in the side of the powers that be, there was no talk of rallying to support Santorum “for the good of the party.” Six years later, Specter, up for reelection again is denied support by Jim DeMint and Specter immediatly becomes a democrat.

Santorum was a true devotee to Specter, he not only supported him for president in his 1996 run to remove life from the party platform and in all of his elections, but he supported him against Toomey in 2004.

The thing that people DON'T know, is that Santorum was STILL fighting for Specter in the 2010 election, up until when Specter became a democrat. Santorum was a Romney fan in 2008.

77 posted on 03/18/2013 1:24:40 PM PDT by ansel12 (" I would not be in the United States Senate if it wasnÂ’t for Sarah Palin " Cruz said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

And that’s why I couldn’t support Santorum last year. He put one of his senate buddies before the cause. His speech at CPAC last week was very good though.


78 posted on 03/18/2013 1:27:51 PM PDT by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: manc
Come round here and noone wants that turd poking agenda, weaker defence, drugs

But folks round there do want drug profits hyperinflated to tens of billions of dollars and channeled into criminal and terrorist hands as the War on Drugs does?

oh let me guess I think I remember you harping on about making marriage open for what ever

You may remember it, but I never said it.

and now do you want also to make all drugs legal?

Simple answer yes or no do you want heroin, LSD legal

Yes - all criminalizing them has done is enrich criminals and put said criminals in charge of keeping them away from kids.

and di you want those who sell those drugs to open their shops anywhere

No, I support local zoning regulations.

79 posted on 03/18/2013 2:03:34 PM PDT by JustSayNoToNannies ("The Lord has removed His judgments against you" - Zep. 3:15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

The GOP establishment has no core beliefs. Therefore their goal is winning elections, not preserving liberty.


80 posted on 03/18/2013 3:16:04 PM PDT by Soul of the South (Yesterday is gone. Today will be what we make of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson