Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Starve obama and his obots
self | 1/21/2013 | Chrisnj

Posted on 01/21/2013 8:12:12 AM PST by chrisnj

Ideas to starve obama and his obots -

obama/big gov sucks the blood out of us productive people to give to his obots to buy their votes. It is time we turn the table on them! We, the business owners, the employers, the gainfully employed, the consumers, hold the purse strings. We must control the purse strings to starve them and bring them to their knees -

Business owners - charge the obots more for goods and services - reasonable since they are the ones that support obama's policies/regulations to raise costs to do business.

Employers - when need to lay off employess, lay off the obots since they support obama's anti-business policies

Gainfully employed people/consumers - consume as little as possible to reduce revenues to 'gov', pay as little taxes as possible, boycott all libtard org/businesses, patronize the consevative org/businesses

Doctors - refuse to treat obots since they support obozocare that raises medical costs and reduces resources for everybody. For the wealthy libtards charge them an arm and a leg for care.

Don't worry, the majority of employers will not be able to retaliate by laying off the productive conservative empolyees because then they will have no dependable work force. They need us more than we need them.

Half of the population are right-leaning, anti-big gov. If they all unite to starve obama big gov and his obots, they will bring them to their knees.

When the gov can't squeeze more money from us, but the welfare/unemployed rank keep rising, and the gov can't give them freebies any more, even the obots will turn against their messiah.

We hold on to our guns and right to protect ourselves. They have no gun protection because they hate guns. We will see how they can threaten us.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: obama; obots; starve

1 posted on 01/21/2013 8:12:19 AM PST by chrisnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: chrisnj

Strongly advise you to check with an attorney before you put any of this into practice since discrimination on the basis of gender or race is prohibited.

Matter of fact, you might wish to check with the mods about keeping this post on this website since it could be construed to advocating discrimination.


2 posted on 01/21/2013 8:22:14 AM PST by DugwayDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

I think your assumption that the obots are of a certain gender and race is prejudice.
It’s like believing that most SNAP are not white, which in fact they are (43%).


3 posted on 01/21/2013 8:27:00 AM PST by griswold3 (Big Government does not tolerate rivals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: chrisnj

The Democrat Party has a political police force. When unionized public-service police personnel violate the rights of citizens and cause bodily harm to said citizens, payment for damages should come out of the union pension funds, not the taxpayers.


4 posted on 01/21/2013 8:28:58 AM PST by Zuben Elgenubi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

Being afraid of greedy attorneys and speaking your mind are all part of the problem.


5 posted on 01/21/2013 8:29:33 AM PST by Minutemen ("It's a Religion of Peace")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: chrisnj

Want to pull up Progressivism root and branch?

end the Federal Reserve. Establishing the Fed was the first and most important pillar of Progressive Gov’t. Not a single Progressive program or “big Gov’” would be possible if the Federal Reserve did not exist.

Very few conservatives, if any, are prepared to support this though.


6 posted on 01/21/2013 8:31:58 AM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

discrimination based on political ideology is not a problem

if it were, hollywood and the media would have a problem... it’s also why they never put it in the long list

gov’t itself would also have a problem. do you think 0bama’s WH would hire an outspoke conservative?

there is NOTHING wrong with the suggestion and i would recommend doing it best you can. i’ve gone a but further and have stopped associating with liberals in my personal life (which wasn’t very many)


7 posted on 01/21/2013 8:33:35 AM PST by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: chrisnj

Besides controlling the pursestrings we should also TAKE from them as well using their own tools. EBT cards and SNAP cards can buy a LOT of PREPPER FOOD such as cans of beans etc...


8 posted on 01/21/2013 8:33:43 AM PST by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chrisnj

So you want doctors and employers to ask people if they are liberals or democrats and then react accordingly? Good luck with that!


9 posted on 01/21/2013 8:36:47 AM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke; chrisnj
RE :”Strongly advise you to check with an attorney before you put any of this into practice since discrimination on the basis of gender or race is prohibited.”

My initial thought too.

You can decide what stores to shop at or what businesses to hire though,

Notice you can descriminate on sex and race when picking a personal doctor, wimmin would be up in arms if they couldnt

10 posted on 01/21/2013 8:36:51 AM PST by sickoflibs (Losing to O is NO principle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: griswold3

I assumed nothing but the distribution of voters by race and gender is well known.

May I suggest a thought experiment. How long would it take for a business to get sued that posted a sign that stated that all Obama voters would be charged a 10% surcharge? Even if that business won, the cost of the lawsuit would be prohibitive.

As I said, ask an attorney.


11 posted on 01/21/2013 8:37:48 AM PST by DugwayDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: chrisnj

So let me get this right . . . you are advocating firing millions of people so that they starve to death, and then when they get really desperate and start to commit crimes to survive, you’re going to shoot them? Just checking to make sure I have your drift.


12 posted on 01/21/2013 8:39:38 AM PST by PoeToaster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoeToaster

If you are upset about the absolute WASTE of SPENDING in Washington everyone can do 1 simple thing: Change your W2 and increase your dependents! Less they take from you out of your paycheck is less of your money going to things you don’t have control over!


13 posted on 01/21/2013 8:47:59 AM PST by princess leah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: GraceG
EBT cards and SNAP cards can buy a LOT of PREPPER FOOD such as cans of beans etc...

They're progressive heroin. You don't want to mess with them.
The object is to deny the left any and all funding as possible, so they don't have the funds to fulfill their communist vote buying programs

Anything with a tax feeds the beast. Legally avoid any type of taxed goods as possible, and remember to deduct, deduct, deduct.
Do not over pay your taxes. If you get a refund, you're paying too much. They get to use your money while they have it, and they get to collect interest on it while they have it as well.

99% of the time, when both husband and wife works, they actually lose more money than if only one worked. Besides all the expenses associated with going to work every day and paying for child care, lowering the household income also allows the family to use a different tax bracket. If one were to leave the workforce, their total usable income would go UP. Their taxes would go DOWN. This is the dirty little secret the progressive "womans liberation" liberals don't want you to know.
They got mom out of her house. Now, the family not only is burdened with massive taxation, their kids have become the property of the teachers unions.

14 posted on 01/21/2013 8:52:09 AM PST by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: chrisnj

The Federal government’s weakest link is the IRS. Any disruption of revenue will destabilize funding programs and the currency. The Treasury’s ability to borrow and print is predicated on a certain base of revenue. If the ratio of borrowing + monetary expansion to tax revenue becomes too great, credit ratings will plumment, and creditors will demand higher interest or simply pull out of the US soverign debt market. More money printing will only add fuel to the fire.
This could happen if the economy stalls and goes into a severe recession, or there is some sort of civil disobedience/strife, black markets/evasion etc.
Once civil strife hits, the disobedience will likely increase, but IRS enforcement will intensify. States could pass laws to protect citizens from SWAT raids by the IRS, but I doubt it. The situation may deteriorate to the point of martial law (especially in blue states and cities). Then, at that time, we may see targeting of IRS agents, auditors, their families etc. Capturing a high ranking IRS IT guy could lead to hacking of IRS computers and widespread malfunctioning of the collection system.


15 posted on 01/21/2013 8:56:17 AM PST by grumpygresh (Democrats delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

Nah he’s just exercising his First Amendment right while he still has it. He has a good point. Starve ‘em out. Find ways to reduce your tax burden (for a lot of us we don’t have to try; his policies and regulations have already drastically reduced our income). The only way he can implement these left winf Satanic fantasies is with money; lots of it (especially those tracking implants with behavior modification / inhibitor options)..../s


16 posted on 01/21/2013 8:59:46 AM PST by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

Nah he’s just exercising his First Amendment right while he still has it. He has a good point. Starve ‘em out. Find ways to reduce your tax burden (for a lot of us we don’t have to try; his policies and regulations have already drastically reduced our income). The only way he can implement these left winf Satanic fantasies is with money; lots of it (especially those tracking implants with behavior modification / inhibitor options)...

As long as the people enacting these policies don’t state them or their intentions there’s no way it can be proven to discrimination as long as you have a valid sounding response....sort of an Alinskyesh type tactic. They sure not mind using them.


17 posted on 01/21/2013 9:02:40 AM PST by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

Nah he’s just exercising his First Amendment right while he still has it. He has a good point. Starve ‘em out. Find ways to reduce your tax burden (for a lot of us we don’t have to try; his policies and regulations have already drastically reduced our income). The only way he can implement these left winf Satanic fantasies is with money; lots of it (especially those tracking implants with behavior modification / inhibitor options)...

As long as the people enacting these policies don’t state them or their intentions there’s no way it can be proven to discrimination as long as you have a valid sounding response....sort of an Alinskyesh type tactic. Liberals sure don’t mind using them.


18 posted on 01/21/2013 9:03:00 AM PST by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

“Strongly advise you to check with an attorney before you put any of this into practice since discrimination on the basis of gender or race is prohibited.”

There is no mention of race or gender in this article. Your post has no meaning here.


19 posted on 01/21/2013 9:38:02 AM PST by Marcella (Prepping can save your life today. Going Galt is freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: chrisnj

Agree with this post and have been implementing some of tbese suggestions already. I took my income covert in ‘01, went on tax strike in ‘08, and I do make liberals pay more than conservative clients, and yes I am often in a position to know their politics.

Let the leftists take care of their own. And if there is a conservative hacker group out there, I would contribute to a fund to ensure EBT payouts are continually on the fritz.

I can’t believe there are people on this site boo-hooing because the people destroying this country, jacking our elections, sh*tt*ng on our constitution in exchange for entitlements, might miss a meal. Let them eat pigeons. When I was young, broke, and short of food, I did that a couple times. I also took ducks out of a pond once, bought a bag if rice and made it stretch til payday. I sure as hell didn’t go on food stamps.

I walk to the store while people on assistance drive cars with rims, and have encountered 300#+ EBT mamas fighting over the last “disabled” scooter.

Let me know when they’re eating rats, and I’ll have some sympathy.


20 posted on 01/21/2013 9:44:17 AM PST by fattigermaster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoeToaster

“you are advocating firing millions of people so that they starve to death, and then when they get really desperate and start to commit crimes to survive, you’re going to shoot them?”

Yes, i advocate firing anyone who voted for Obama. They are destroying the economy, so screw em. They can’t have it both ways. And i will never hire anyone to work on my car, my house, anything,,if i know they support Obama.

And if they are poor, nobody says they have to turn to crime. If they turn to crime against me, ill happily shoot them. But they should act like the poor in the great depression. Wear their clothes till they fall off, ask the government they love for assistance, go move in with relatives, brother can you spare a dime, live in a cardboard hut, work hard hard physical day labor,,etc. Being poor doesn’t give one an excuse to be a criminal.
And then, there is redemption. They can apologize, go to church, start being active in the TEA party. ANd then stand back and watch as their life becomes good again.

But basically, fire them all, all you can. Let them enjoy their socialist paradise. They are tryng to ruin you financially, so what could be more fair than doing it to them. They should then see the light and repent. If however they go feral and start crossing into crime, they should expect to be shot.


21 posted on 01/21/2013 9:55:23 AM PST by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: PoeToaster

What happens when the SNAP debit cards stop working?

I take it you will invite them into your home to feed them?


22 posted on 01/21/2013 9:55:30 AM PST by listenhillary (Courts, law enforcement, roads and national defense should be the extent of government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: PoeToaster

If you are upset about the absolute WASTE of SPENDING in Washington everyone can do 1 simple thing: Change your W2 and increase your dependents! Less they take from you out of your paycheck is less of your money going to things you don’t have control over!


23 posted on 01/21/2013 9:56:54 AM PST by princess leah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: PoeToaster

And maybe you havent heard, but we are late to the dance. Any idea how most unions treat people who are openly anti-Obama? The Teachers unions? The film industry? Most of NYC?

Let people in those areas of the country know you are pro TEA and despise Obama, see how long you keep a job. WHy aren;t you worried we will turn to crime?

Thats a real laugher about causing them to turn to crime. All they would need to do is move to a socialist utopia like New York, Boston, California, etc. WHy wouldnt they find a job among their fellow traitors?


24 posted on 01/21/2013 10:01:54 AM PST by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: chrisnj

I believe you are on the right track. Please check out the Conservative Action Plan on my blog: http://backyardfence.wordpress.com/conservative-action-plan/


25 posted on 01/21/2013 10:06:42 AM PST by gspurlock (http://www.backyardfence.wordpress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoeToaster

Besides,, it’s also a positive virtue. Because of Obama, Obamacare, and his reckless uneducated economics, there will simply be fewer jobs.
Why would i fire someone who tried to stop Obama, and make them suffer, when i can fire an Obama cheerleader who helped create the mess?
A rough definition of justice is getting what you deserve.

Besides, one’s politics reveals their ethics. If someone supports Obama, they are not anyone you should often trust. Their world view is seriously skewed. They love socialism, gays, hate the constitution, etc.


26 posted on 01/21/2013 10:16:30 AM PST by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics

When your income level goes into the next tax bracket it only affects that portion of your income over that threshold, not your entire taxable income. That fact changes your entire calculation.


27 posted on 01/21/2013 10:19:30 AM PST by GnL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: chrisnj
I am doing my part, being self employed. I can control completely how much I make, how many taxes I pay. I am a landlord, I do not rent to Section 8 people anymore, I do not rent to anyone with the free scholarship money BO is handing out to deadbeats that think they can go to school, I don't rent to anyone on food stamps or welfare and very few single moms. I only rent to people that have full time jobs with no government assistance.

and I know about the rules for discrimination, I do not tell these people why I did not rent to them, I tell them you do not meet our qualifications for a tenant.

28 posted on 01/21/2013 10:55:34 AM PST by thirst4truth (www.Believer.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke
Really? Don't they have to prove it in a court of law? I currently have as tenants: children, women, men, disabled men and women, older folks on SS and some on SSDI.

I can legally deny a person based on their sources of income, I don't rent to people that have to borrow money from the government to pay rent, the scholarship people, I don't have to rent to someone on welfare as our criteria is a working tenant. No laws in Oregon restricting me from not renting to a person that does not have a job. Only thing restricting me is age and familial status.

29 posted on 01/21/2013 12:40:17 PM PST by thirst4truth (www.Believer.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: chrisnj
When the gov can't squeeze more money from us, but the welfare/unemployed rank keep rising, and the gov can't give them freebies any more, even the obots will turn against their messiah.

What make you think they'll turn their wrath on Obozo? You said it yourself, he's their messiah, a title he proudly accepts. He will be held innocent no matter what happens.

No, the rioters will come after us after they burn down their neighborhoods. Keep your powder dry, especially if you live near a train stop.

30 posted on 01/21/2013 12:51:25 PM PST by Cyber Liberty (Obama considers the Third World morally superior to the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

Who said anything about discriminating based on gender or race?

Employers and business owners have the right to hire and fire employees who do not meet their job requirement - e.g. common sense and good working ethics. They are free to let go those (obots) that have no common sense and have bad working ethics.

Certainly you do not advertise the reason they are laid off is because they are o-supporters.

Are you aware of any laws against firing people of different political persuasion?

We all associate with like-minded people. Same for hiring/firing.


31 posted on 01/21/2013 2:08:00 PM PST by chrisnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: thirst4truth

Prove it in a court of law? You’d be lucky to get into court. Years and years of discovery. One petition after another. Remember, the government has lots and lots of attorneys and they are tax payer funded. Your attorneys aren’t. And, yes, you would need at least one for every one the government put on the case.

The government is a master of this type of litigation. They may recognize they would lose in court but they know they can stall until you either go bankrupt or agree to settle.

For example. During the Clinton administration, a local government bought an old motel with the intent of converting it to a half-way house for those with mental and drug related issues. The local homeowners organized and filed a petition to stop the action. The feds kept them in litigation until they dropped their case and even required them to host a “welcome to the neighborhood party” for their new neighbors. When it was pointed out that the property owners were only exercising their constitutional rights to ‘peacefully assemble and petition their government’, the government responded that the rights of the ‘homeless’ trumped these rights.

Now, just how much would it cost you to defend yourself?

From the description of your rentals, it sounds like you probably have access to a lawyer. Why don’t you ask him
(hypothetically) his advice on posting a sign that you won’t rent to anyone who voted for Obama? Ask him if you could be sued on the basis of disproportionate discrimination? Oh, and, ask him about how much you’d spend on the litigation?

One last thing. Since you’ve discussed this with others (this thread), ask him if that could be the basis for a charge of conspiracy to deny civil rights too?

Notice, the question isn’t whether you’d win but whether you could find yourself in some very messy and expensive issues.


32 posted on 01/21/2013 2:08:24 PM PST by DugwayDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

I am all for abolishing the Fed Reserve. However we don’t have the power to do so, especially when obozo is still in power.
It is in our power to control the purse strings!


33 posted on 01/21/2013 2:12:01 PM PST by chrisnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

Doctors don’t have to ask. They just have to praise obozo or obozcare and watch for the patients’ response. Then tell the cashier how much to charge (much more for obots to discourage them from coming back) and whether to allow the patient to come back for service in the future.


34 posted on 01/21/2013 2:19:08 PM PST by chrisnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

Ohhhh we need to fight wisely - no need to openly advertise our policies.

Doctors just have to praise obozo or obozcare and watch the patients’ response, then decide on how much to charge and whether to allow that patient to come back for service (with some excuses of course.)

DugwayDuke, you appear to be very protective of the obots. I am surprised you don’t seem to be proficient in playing dirty tricks, or are you just trying to get to our secrets?


35 posted on 01/21/2013 2:28:04 PM PST by chrisnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: griswold3

43% equals most?


36 posted on 01/21/2013 2:31:41 PM PST by csmusaret (I will give Obama credit for one thing- he is living proof that familiarity breeds contempt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PoeToaster

You are conveniently exaggerating and twisting my words!

Are there millions of obots gainfully employed? Do the employers have millions of obots on their hands?

No one is saying to lay off all the (millions) obots. Just saying since obozo’s policies make it hard for employers to keep all their employees, they will have to lay off some of those obozo-supporters who cause this problem in the first place!

obozo won’t let them starve. He and his gang will keep on giving until there is no more to give. Sooner or later they will run out of other people’s money to give. AND WE WILL HELP TO DEPLETE THEIR PIGGY-BANKS SOONER!

If it gets to the point that ‘millions’ have to commit crimes to survive, then probably many employers would have lost their businesses too due to obozo’s destructive policies/regulations. The obots won’t even have ex-employers to blame!

Of course we won’t shoot the hungry.
But we will defend our families from any deliberate harm


37 posted on 01/21/2013 2:48:59 PM PST by chrisnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: grumpygresh

Well said!


38 posted on 01/21/2013 2:52:57 PM PST by chrisnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

Bravo for your keen insight into the state we are in now!


39 posted on 01/21/2013 3:02:18 PM PST by chrisnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: chrisnj
Protect the 'obots'? I'm protecting you. Another word of advice. “All warfare is based on deception.” ― Sun Tzu, The Art of War
40 posted on 01/21/2013 3:16:16 PM PST by DugwayDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: All

While starving the beast, we really should make good use of our money - these 2 are probably the most important -
1. kill/reduce voter fraud
2. start a TV station to broadcast conservative news and promote conservative principles - some how we must be able to find the talent and gather the resources to start one.


41 posted on 01/22/2013 3:03:23 PM PST by chrisnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson