Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Starve obama and his obots
self | 1/21/2013 | Chrisnj

Posted on 01/21/2013 8:12:12 AM PST by chrisnj

Ideas to starve obama and his obots -

obama/big gov sucks the blood out of us productive people to give to his obots to buy their votes. It is time we turn the table on them! We, the business owners, the employers, the gainfully employed, the consumers, hold the purse strings. We must control the purse strings to starve them and bring them to their knees -

Business owners - charge the obots more for goods and services - reasonable since they are the ones that support obama's policies/regulations to raise costs to do business.

Employers - when need to lay off employess, lay off the obots since they support obama's anti-business policies

Gainfully employed people/consumers - consume as little as possible to reduce revenues to 'gov', pay as little taxes as possible, boycott all libtard org/businesses, patronize the consevative org/businesses

Doctors - refuse to treat obots since they support obozocare that raises medical costs and reduces resources for everybody. For the wealthy libtards charge them an arm and a leg for care.

Don't worry, the majority of employers will not be able to retaliate by laying off the productive conservative empolyees because then they will have no dependable work force. They need us more than we need them.

Half of the population are right-leaning, anti-big gov. If they all unite to starve obama big gov and his obots, they will bring them to their knees.

When the gov can't squeeze more money from us, but the welfare/unemployed rank keep rising, and the gov can't give them freebies any more, even the obots will turn against their messiah.

We hold on to our guns and right to protect ourselves. They have no gun protection because they hate guns. We will see how they can threaten us.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: obama; obots; starve
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

1 posted on 01/21/2013 8:12:19 AM PST by chrisnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: chrisnj

Strongly advise you to check with an attorney before you put any of this into practice since discrimination on the basis of gender or race is prohibited.

Matter of fact, you might wish to check with the mods about keeping this post on this website since it could be construed to advocating discrimination.


2 posted on 01/21/2013 8:22:14 AM PST by DugwayDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

I think your assumption that the obots are of a certain gender and race is prejudice.
It’s like believing that most SNAP are not white, which in fact they are (43%).


3 posted on 01/21/2013 8:27:00 AM PST by griswold3 (Big Government does not tolerate rivals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: chrisnj

The Democrat Party has a political police force. When unionized public-service police personnel violate the rights of citizens and cause bodily harm to said citizens, payment for damages should come out of the union pension funds, not the taxpayers.


4 posted on 01/21/2013 8:28:58 AM PST by Zuben Elgenubi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

Being afraid of greedy attorneys and speaking your mind are all part of the problem.


5 posted on 01/21/2013 8:29:33 AM PST by Minutemen ("It's a Religion of Peace")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: chrisnj

Want to pull up Progressivism root and branch?

end the Federal Reserve. Establishing the Fed was the first and most important pillar of Progressive Gov’t. Not a single Progressive program or “big Gov’” would be possible if the Federal Reserve did not exist.

Very few conservatives, if any, are prepared to support this though.


6 posted on 01/21/2013 8:31:58 AM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

discrimination based on political ideology is not a problem

if it were, hollywood and the media would have a problem... it’s also why they never put it in the long list

gov’t itself would also have a problem. do you think 0bama’s WH would hire an outspoke conservative?

there is NOTHING wrong with the suggestion and i would recommend doing it best you can. i’ve gone a but further and have stopped associating with liberals in my personal life (which wasn’t very many)


7 posted on 01/21/2013 8:33:35 AM PST by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: chrisnj

Besides controlling the pursestrings we should also TAKE from them as well using their own tools. EBT cards and SNAP cards can buy a LOT of PREPPER FOOD such as cans of beans etc...


8 posted on 01/21/2013 8:33:43 AM PST by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chrisnj

So you want doctors and employers to ask people if they are liberals or democrats and then react accordingly? Good luck with that!


9 posted on 01/21/2013 8:36:47 AM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke; chrisnj
RE :”Strongly advise you to check with an attorney before you put any of this into practice since discrimination on the basis of gender or race is prohibited.”

My initial thought too.

You can decide what stores to shop at or what businesses to hire though,

Notice you can descriminate on sex and race when picking a personal doctor, wimmin would be up in arms if they couldnt

10 posted on 01/21/2013 8:36:51 AM PST by sickoflibs (Losing to O is NO principle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: griswold3

I assumed nothing but the distribution of voters by race and gender is well known.

May I suggest a thought experiment. How long would it take for a business to get sued that posted a sign that stated that all Obama voters would be charged a 10% surcharge? Even if that business won, the cost of the lawsuit would be prohibitive.

As I said, ask an attorney.


11 posted on 01/21/2013 8:37:48 AM PST by DugwayDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: chrisnj

So let me get this right . . . you are advocating firing millions of people so that they starve to death, and then when they get really desperate and start to commit crimes to survive, you’re going to shoot them? Just checking to make sure I have your drift.


12 posted on 01/21/2013 8:39:38 AM PST by PoeToaster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoeToaster

If you are upset about the absolute WASTE of SPENDING in Washington everyone can do 1 simple thing: Change your W2 and increase your dependents! Less they take from you out of your paycheck is less of your money going to things you don’t have control over!


13 posted on 01/21/2013 8:47:59 AM PST by princess leah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: GraceG
EBT cards and SNAP cards can buy a LOT of PREPPER FOOD such as cans of beans etc...

They're progressive heroin. You don't want to mess with them.
The object is to deny the left any and all funding as possible, so they don't have the funds to fulfill their communist vote buying programs

Anything with a tax feeds the beast. Legally avoid any type of taxed goods as possible, and remember to deduct, deduct, deduct.
Do not over pay your taxes. If you get a refund, you're paying too much. They get to use your money while they have it, and they get to collect interest on it while they have it as well.

99% of the time, when both husband and wife works, they actually lose more money than if only one worked. Besides all the expenses associated with going to work every day and paying for child care, lowering the household income also allows the family to use a different tax bracket. If one were to leave the workforce, their total usable income would go UP. Their taxes would go DOWN. This is the dirty little secret the progressive "womans liberation" liberals don't want you to know.
They got mom out of her house. Now, the family not only is burdened with massive taxation, their kids have become the property of the teachers unions.

14 posted on 01/21/2013 8:52:09 AM PST by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: chrisnj

The Federal government’s weakest link is the IRS. Any disruption of revenue will destabilize funding programs and the currency. The Treasury’s ability to borrow and print is predicated on a certain base of revenue. If the ratio of borrowing + monetary expansion to tax revenue becomes too great, credit ratings will plumment, and creditors will demand higher interest or simply pull out of the US soverign debt market. More money printing will only add fuel to the fire.
This could happen if the economy stalls and goes into a severe recession, or there is some sort of civil disobedience/strife, black markets/evasion etc.
Once civil strife hits, the disobedience will likely increase, but IRS enforcement will intensify. States could pass laws to protect citizens from SWAT raids by the IRS, but I doubt it. The situation may deteriorate to the point of martial law (especially in blue states and cities). Then, at that time, we may see targeting of IRS agents, auditors, their families etc. Capturing a high ranking IRS IT guy could lead to hacking of IRS computers and widespread malfunctioning of the collection system.


15 posted on 01/21/2013 8:56:17 AM PST by grumpygresh (Democrats delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

Nah he’s just exercising his First Amendment right while he still has it. He has a good point. Starve ‘em out. Find ways to reduce your tax burden (for a lot of us we don’t have to try; his policies and regulations have already drastically reduced our income). The only way he can implement these left winf Satanic fantasies is with money; lots of it (especially those tracking implants with behavior modification / inhibitor options)..../s


16 posted on 01/21/2013 8:59:46 AM PST by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

Nah he’s just exercising his First Amendment right while he still has it. He has a good point. Starve ‘em out. Find ways to reduce your tax burden (for a lot of us we don’t have to try; his policies and regulations have already drastically reduced our income). The only way he can implement these left winf Satanic fantasies is with money; lots of it (especially those tracking implants with behavior modification / inhibitor options)...

As long as the people enacting these policies don’t state them or their intentions there’s no way it can be proven to discrimination as long as you have a valid sounding response....sort of an Alinskyesh type tactic. They sure not mind using them.


17 posted on 01/21/2013 9:02:40 AM PST by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

Nah he’s just exercising his First Amendment right while he still has it. He has a good point. Starve ‘em out. Find ways to reduce your tax burden (for a lot of us we don’t have to try; his policies and regulations have already drastically reduced our income). The only way he can implement these left winf Satanic fantasies is with money; lots of it (especially those tracking implants with behavior modification / inhibitor options)...

As long as the people enacting these policies don’t state them or their intentions there’s no way it can be proven to discrimination as long as you have a valid sounding response....sort of an Alinskyesh type tactic. Liberals sure don’t mind using them.


18 posted on 01/21/2013 9:03:00 AM PST by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

“Strongly advise you to check with an attorney before you put any of this into practice since discrimination on the basis of gender or race is prohibited.”

There is no mention of race or gender in this article. Your post has no meaning here.


19 posted on 01/21/2013 9:38:02 AM PST by Marcella (Prepping can save your life today. Going Galt is freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: chrisnj

Agree with this post and have been implementing some of tbese suggestions already. I took my income covert in ‘01, went on tax strike in ‘08, and I do make liberals pay more than conservative clients, and yes I am often in a position to know their politics.

Let the leftists take care of their own. And if there is a conservative hacker group out there, I would contribute to a fund to ensure EBT payouts are continually on the fritz.

I can’t believe there are people on this site boo-hooing because the people destroying this country, jacking our elections, sh*tt*ng on our constitution in exchange for entitlements, might miss a meal. Let them eat pigeons. When I was young, broke, and short of food, I did that a couple times. I also took ducks out of a pond once, bought a bag if rice and made it stretch til payday. I sure as hell didn’t go on food stamps.

I walk to the store while people on assistance drive cars with rims, and have encountered 300#+ EBT mamas fighting over the last “disabled” scooter.

Let me know when they’re eating rats, and I’ll have some sympathy.


20 posted on 01/21/2013 9:44:17 AM PST by fattigermaster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson