Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What happened with the Rep from Texas that was going to push for impeachment? (Vanity)
1/17/13 | VMIVol00

Posted on 01/17/2013 4:11:23 AM PST by vmivol00

What happened with the Rep from Texas that was going to push for impeachment if Obama issued his 19 EOs?

Well he issued 23 I'm pretty sure. Did I miss something or was this just another GOP pretend to have guts moment?


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: chat; guncontrol; impeachment; secondamendment; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-54 next last

1 posted on 01/17/2013 4:11:28 AM PST by vmivol00
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: vmivol00

crickets


2 posted on 01/17/2013 4:13:40 AM PST by mark3681
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mark3681

Facade just like America.


3 posted on 01/17/2013 4:14:55 AM PST by bicyclerepair ( >-> Zombies eat brains. >-> 50% of FL is safe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: vmivol00

Good morning vmivo100, i hope you are well today. now is the time for patience.

Some rush in and expose themselves; some plot and look for the exact moment to overpower a mighty warrior. The Executive “Orders” were announced yesterday. They were not even orders, but directives, not having the effect and force of law.

Keep your powder dry, for now. As it has been said, “If you strike the King, you must slay the King!”

Gwjack


4 posted on 01/17/2013 4:20:20 AM PST by gwjack (May God give America His richest blessings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vmivol00

One thing to say for “conservatives” these days, it sure isn’t hard to get them to fight amongst themselves. Divide and conquer.


5 posted on 01/17/2013 4:22:10 AM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

He got notified he was being audited
He received photographs of himself taken from a surveillance van posted 24/7
His old mugshots were sent to him with a preemptive press release....: )


6 posted on 01/17/2013 4:26:25 AM PST by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: vmivol00

Actually, I think this was another clever ruse by the liberals to try and make us look like extremists. Plugs hinted that zero would do something drastic by executive order. While most people thought it, a few (two I believe) Congressmen spoke up that it would be an impeachable offense.

Now zero has issued a bunch of meaningless executive ‘suggestions’ I am certain that the media will be all over the ‘threats of impeachment’. I can’t say I blame people for threatening to impeach him, but we probably should have kept our powder dry till the idiot opened his mouth.


7 posted on 01/17/2013 4:28:16 AM PST by I cannot think of a name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vmivol00

You don’t even know his name.

I’ll give you drivebys a clue.

His name starts with an “S”.

See ya’ll at the ballgame.


8 posted on 01/17/2013 4:28:45 AM PST by wolficatZ (Hey blue states....Got Food?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001

“He got notified he was being audited
He received photographs of himself taken from a surveillance van posted 24/7
His old mugshots were sent to him with a preemptive press release....: )”

Is he going to lose a committee position as well?

Boehnor plays rough!


9 posted on 01/17/2013 4:28:45 AM PST by vmivol00 (I won't be reconstructed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: vmivol00

Pretend.


10 posted on 01/17/2013 4:30:16 AM PST by autumnraine (America how long will you be so deaf and dumb to the tumbril wheels carrying you to the guillotine?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I cannot think of a name

Yeah, even my most ardent 2nd amendment friends were like “Menh, I can live with that.”


11 posted on 01/17/2013 4:31:58 AM PST by autumnraine (America how long will you be so deaf and dumb to the tumbril wheels carrying you to the guillotine?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine

For now that is.


12 posted on 01/17/2013 4:42:23 AM PST by Biggirl ("Jesus talked to us as individuals"-Jim Vicevich/Thanks JimV!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: vmivol00

The hell with impeachment. We conservatives here in the great blue northeast are looking toward states like Texas or OK to secede. I am ready to move back to the REAL America.


13 posted on 01/17/2013 4:42:23 AM PST by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

I prefer a purge...... that is all the yankee blue of Neo Europe should be purged from the American union.

Such an action will precipitate another great migration as people move back and forth to establish some political near equilibrium.


14 posted on 01/17/2013 4:48:01 AM PST by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 .....The fairest Deduction to be reduced is the Standard Deduction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: vmivol00
What happened with the Rep from Texas that was going to push for impeachment if Obama issued his 19 EOs?

He never said he would push for impeachment if Obama issued executive orders, he said he would push for impeachment if Obama issued executive orders that infringed on the 2nd Amendment.

Obama's dog & pony show didn't 'affect' anything....it was just a feel good chest-thumping program staged for his adoring masses.

-----

Did I miss something

Apparently.

15 posted on 01/17/2013 4:49:51 AM PST by MamaTexan (To follow Original Constitutional Intent, one MUST acknowledge the Right of secession)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

I agree, time to starve out the liberal gun grabbing followers of the new world order of Islam.

No fruits or veggies, cattle will be scarce but they will live on soy, but even the soy has to be grown somewhere.


16 posted on 01/17/2013 4:50:28 AM PST by Eye of Unk (AR2 2013 is the American Revolution part 2 of 2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

Good morning Vaquero, I hope you have an outstanding day.

You (and all others) are always welcome to come “home” to Texas and Oklahoma. Will Rogers once said that he had never met a man that he didn’t like. I have found that same spirit alive today. In fact, the unconditional acceptance is a quality that pervades this area. But don’t cross us - much like what is written in your tag line.

My best,

Gwjackson

P.S. if you get down this way, even for a short time, I have a few clients that would invite you to target shoot with wild, feral hogs. There is no season, so anytime is fine. The pigs are a pest to his crops and cattle.


17 posted on 01/17/2013 4:54:06 AM PST by gwjack (May God give America His richest blessings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: vmivol00

Obama either blinked of head-faked.

The congressman’s implication was that if Obama did something unconstitutional, the constitutional remedy would be impeachment. Instead of real executive orders, Obama’s actions were all as meaningless as ordering himself to finally nominate an ATF director and otherwise do his job in accordance with existing law - political posturing, a campaign commercial in which he manipulated and abused innocent children for personal gain, an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing. Despite all the empty threats, Obama’s actual “orders” were a breathtakingly trivial distraction (meanwhile NY passed a flood of unconstitutional laws in a matter of hours as we all looked the wrong way, and it will take years in the courts to reverse that criminal action).


18 posted on 01/17/2013 4:57:18 AM PST by Pollster1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vmivol00

both parties want to keep the status quo.
They both b making lots of money. Why change things?
Gots to get rid of those damn troublesone tea partiers though cause they b rocking the gravey boat.
This guys been paid off.


19 posted on 01/17/2013 5:00:22 AM PST by Joe Boucher ((FUBO))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero
"The hell with impeachment. We conservatives here in the great blue northeast are looking toward states like Texas or OK to secede. I am ready to move back to the REAL America."

BINGO! Can you imagine the panic of libtards if several states seceded and all the productive folks started moving there? "OMG, how can they do that. They're SELFISH!"

I'm not in a position to move right now, but in ten years or so, HELL YES I would.

20 posted on 01/17/2013 5:01:32 AM PST by Mich Patriot (PITCH BLACK is the new "transparent")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: gwjack
Will Rogers once said that he had never met a man that he didn’t like.

Will Rogers never met Barack Obama. I have, and my first thought was that same quote. Barack is the kind of guy that half the room swoons over - and the other half checks their wallets, or their wives/girlfriends/daughters (and with Barack their young sons too) to make sure they are safe from him.

21 posted on 01/17/2013 5:02:15 AM PST by Pollster1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: vmivol00

You beat me to it!


22 posted on 01/17/2013 5:03:52 AM PST by COBOL2Java (kak-is-toc-ra-cy: Government by the least qualified or most unprincipled citizens. See: GOP-e)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: vmivol00
I checked some of your older posts - you're good at trashing Republicans - which has it's place... but you were kind of light on trashing democrats. Just to set the record straight can you tell me five things you absolutely can't stand about democrats?
23 posted on 01/17/2013 5:05:55 AM PST by GOPJ ( Gang members breaking down YOUR door-daughter&wife screaming -Dems took YOUR gun. Shots fired.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vmivol00

I haven’t heard of an impeachment proposal.
Maybe you are referring to this ...
http://radio.woai.com/cc-common/mainheadlines3.html?feed=119078&article=10700507
A Texas lawmaker says he plans to file the Firearms Protection Act, which would make any federal laws that may be passed by Congress or imposed by Presidential order which would ban or restrict ownership of semi-automatic firearms or limit the size of gun magazines illegal in the state, 1200 WOAI news reports.

Republican Rep. Steve Toth says his measure also calls for felony criminal charges to be filed against any federal official who tries to enforce the rule in the state.


24 posted on 01/17/2013 5:12:59 AM PST by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liberty Valance

25 posted on 01/17/2013 5:15:57 AM PST by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: vmivol00

Maybe a few hours isn’t quite enough time to organize something like that?


26 posted on 01/17/2013 5:16:59 AM PST by expat1000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vmivol00

If I recall, he’s a freshman which means he isn’t going to do anything that Nancy Boehner doesn’t approve.


27 posted on 01/17/2013 5:18:07 AM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vmivol00
Yesterday I emailed my rep and told him if articles of impeachment are drawn I expect to see his name on them. Got the standard response 'Thank you for contacting Rep. Cory Gardner...'

Maybe today I'll email him again and say why don't you draw those articles of impeachment yourself.

He's good, better than Betsy Markey, but he also voted to keep Boehner. A 'Go along to get along' type.

28 posted on 01/17/2013 5:18:27 AM PST by real saxophonist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero
We need another revolutionary war where we get our entire country back. The succession of a few states would lead to their utter destruction and the death to liberty for all of America. That is what “Divide and Conquer” is all about.
29 posted on 01/17/2013 5:20:30 AM PST by Durus (You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: vmivol00
What happened with the Rep from Texas that was going to push for impeachment

If he is a republican that is your explanation.

30 posted on 01/17/2013 5:26:43 AM PST by TYVets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1; gwjack
Will Rogers once said that he had never met a man that he didn’t like.

curmudgeon and comic genius, WC Fields was quoted once as saying...”...never met a man I didn't like, till I met Will Rogers...”

31 posted on 01/17/2013 5:38:26 AM PST by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: vmivol00; All
That would be Representative Louis Gohmert from Texas. Not being a Texan I couldn't tell you which district for sure, but his district is in the part of the state known as the "hill country", down near Austin.

From what I know of the guy I have a high opinion of him, even if he does cheer for a different school than I do.

I read his comments when they came out, and I think he was saying, actually pretty explicitly, that if 0 were to issue an executive order reclassifying any firearm(s) to class III, or maybe doing the same with any magazines because of their capacity, that he would consider that "outside the authority of the executive branch" and that it would be an impeachable offense.

Again, I'm not a Texan and I don't pay a whole lot of attention to the Texas congressional delegation - but in my opinion Gohmert isn't given to bluster. It just turns out that as some around here were saying yesterday, this situation has proven that the gunowners of this country are not one and the same with Republicans, and we aren't pussified like the Republicans are. We stood up and 0 blinked. Not my words, just read some of the threads after yesterday's press conference.

Gohmert's one of the good guys in John Boehner's House.

Someone, in the interest of clarity, advised me yesterday to keep my powder dry, and I think it's good advice all around.

0 ain't through trying and we all know that, how about let's don't alienate our friends around here?

Nothing personal on anyone, just sayin'...

32 posted on 01/17/2013 5:41:50 AM PST by OKSooner ("The grace of the Lord Jesus be with God's people. Amen." - Revelation 22:21)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vmivol00

Rep. Gohmert: Obama’s ‘Staggering’ Abuse of Law Grounds for Impeachment
Wednesday, 16 Jan 2013 09:30 AM
By Todd Beamon and Kathleen Walter
Should President Barack Obama move towards enacting gun-control legislation by executive order it would be grounds for impeachment, Texas Rep. Louie Gohmert tells Newsmax TV in an exclusive interview.

Obama has “already abused the law enough times that it’s just been staggering,” Gohmert said.

“It’s not a president who steps up and says: ‘You know what? Previous Congresses have passed the law — and it’s been signed into law, and I disagree with it, so I’m just going to create new law — and as I speak, so shall it be,’” Gohmert, a member of the House Judiciary Committee, tells Newsmax. “That’s not a president.”

“The American Revolution was all about fighting such a monarchy — and that is not what the Constitution anticipates. It’s not something a Constitutional president would do.”

“That is something to consider if the president is going to attempt to destroy the Constitution strictly with a pronouncement of his mouth or the stroke of his pen,” he said.

The president plans to announce his program to combat gun violence on Wednesday at the White House. He is expected to present 19 proposed actions — ranging from universal background checks for gun buyers to bans of high-capacity ammunition magazines to initiatives to strengthen mental-health checks — many of which he said can be implimented through executive order.

Obama also plans to seek a tougher ban on assault weapons, which are expected to draw strong resistance from House Republicans and from the National Rifle Association and other gun-rights groups.

Congress should cut funding to Obama proposals that impose on constitutional freedoms, Gohmert said.

“That’s what the Founders anticipated when in the Constitution they gave Congress the power of the purse. The problem is we have tried to defund things that appear to be illegal outside the scope of the current law — and we’ve passed those measures in the House, but there is a Senate, and you have a Senate that’s controlled by Democrats that are complicit with the violation and prevent the cut of funding to the White House or to the measures that overstep the president’s boundaries.

“Anytime the president overstepped his authority and usurped authority from Congress in the past, then there was a bipartisan effort on both sides of the aisle,” Gohmert added. “Both sides of the Capitol would come together and say: ‘Mr. President, privately we’re telling you, you have stepped beyond your authority. You have abused the power of the Congress, and we’re going to defund whatever you’re doing. We’ll defund the White House unless you stop this, knock it off.”

“But, now, unfortunately the Senate Democrats have been complicit with the president — and have refused to come together in a bipartisan, bicameral effort to let the president know that it’s illegal and that it is just compounding the intent of the Founders who set up these checks and balances.

“No one branch has overstepped its boundaries like this president has — and I’m hoping that, at some point, Senate Democrats will realize that protecting and saving the Constitution is more important than just petty, partisan bickering,” Gohmert said.

An assault-weapons ban will not survive in the U.S. House of Representatives, either.

“I don’t see how it would pass in the House, because we have had a so-called assault weapons ban,” Gohmert said. “Let’s face it, a knife can be an assault weapon, a machete – in Rwanda, they slaughtered 800,000 people with machetes.

“An assault-weapons ban has been tried for 10 years. It did nothing to stop gun violence. It doesn’t work. It is just an assault on the Second Amendment. It is not an assault on assault weapons.”

As for the upcoming negotiations on raising the nation’s $16.4 trillion debt ceiling, any agreement must have deep spending cuts, Gohmert said. “I would vote against any measure that doesn’t make massive spending cuts.

“The president, unfortunately, has been done such a disservice by people working for him,” he added, referring to historical references Obama has made about the role of spending cuts in previous debt-ceiling extensions. “Whoever is putting in the words in the president’s teleprompter is lying. He just said that nobody had ever used the debt ceiling for bringing down spending — and yet it just shows the absolute ignorance of the White House to reality.

“Every time in the last 30 years, if there has been a substantial measure to stop overspending, it’s been related to a debt-ceiling bill,” he said, referencing, for instance, the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings legislation from 1985. The bill, which President Ronald Reagan signed into law, was the first that sought to cut the federal deficit via automatic spending cuts.

“You can go on and on, and it’s all very clear — 1990, 1993, 1997 — every time the debt limit was increased, it was tied to spending restrictions,” Gohmert said. “This president has surrounded himself with people who are just giving him absolutely false information — and it’s an embarrassment to this president that he’s being lied to by the people on his staff.”

The United States will not default on its financial obligations, he said, because provisions have been made to pay our debtors, the military, and recipients of Social Security.

“For the president to be out there scaring senior citizens and telling them, in essence, although I’m not going to cut down on my multimillion-dollar vacations, you may have your check cut by order of the president if Congress doesn’t do what I say — that’s basically a temper tantrum,” Gohmert said. “He cannot control his own spending, so he’s being a fear-monger to senior citizens. It’s outrageous.

“It’s been done before with the military, and that’s why there is absolutely no reason for the United States government to default on spending,” he added. “It would be unconscionable — and if the U.S. government did, there would be only one reason, and that’s because the Secretary of the Treasury and the president have acted unconstitutionally, irresponsibly, and have ordered the government not to pay its debts, because we do have the money to pay our debts.”


33 posted on 01/17/2013 5:53:29 AM PST by native texan (I love Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vmivol00

Seems a few states have law makers etc discussing or filing bills or methods to opposed the feds. I didn’t see any Ohio officials listed, have you heard of any?

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/OTUS/state-lawmakers-president-obamas-gun-control-proposal/story?id=18233268

Mississippi
Mississippi Gov. Phil Bryant joined House Speaker Phil Gunn

Texas
State Rep. Steve Toth

Missouri
State Sen. Brian Munzlinger
Rep. Casey Guernsey

Tennessee
State Rep. Jeremy Faison and Sen. Frank Nicely

Wyoming
State Rep. Kendell Kroeker and several other state legislators

Oregon & Kentucky
Sherrifs indicated they wouldn’t enforce Fed. law.


34 posted on 01/17/2013 5:58:45 AM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vmivol00
Obama's use of these EO's were just reaffirming present law and telling his Executive Branch to "sharpen their swords" so to speak. The Dr. stuff was in the Pat. Aff. Health Care Act so nothing new.

Obama did not attempt to create new laws a.k.a. bans and or confiscation schemes, which would of triggered this Congresscritter's call for impeachment. EO's are nothing new, heck, Republicans Presidents are just as bad at trying the "stroke of the pen, law of the land" bit.
35 posted on 01/17/2013 6:00:09 AM PST by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

WCF was a genius.


36 posted on 01/17/2013 6:01:36 AM PST by Pollster1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

Both Rogers and Fields were brilliant. Although I doubt the authenticity of the Fields quote (he said that he never met a kid that he liked), it demonstrates the difference of Yankees, and those from fly-over country; even in the first half of the 20th Century.

Both Rogers and Fields carefully restrained offering any humor by naming a person. They both fastidiously kept their glib comments on a non-personal level.

My best,

Gwjack


37 posted on 01/17/2013 6:04:10 AM PST by gwjack (May God give America His richest blessings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: I cannot think of a name

‘probably should have kept our powder dry till the idiot opened his mouth.’
I beg to differ -
obozo has to replace his original ‘speech’ with this one because of all the pressures from us, and, NRA vows war against them, and, Reid has said that it is a no go...

If we wait till he opens his mouth, it will be too late.

OK, the lamestream will make everything he says/does look good.

We won now, but he won’t give up!

It appears that since Benghazi masacre, obozo has not been on the foreign scene. Assad is actualy in control (running for re-election!) after obozo’s terrorists pounding him for a year.

Perhaps there is a problem in the Barack Obama playground, as someone has ordered him to go back to America and assault Americans on gun control and illegals or they are going to wise up and put Benghazigate together and start a revolution and bring B. Hussein to Justice.


38 posted on 01/17/2013 6:09:09 AM PST by chrisnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: vmivol00

Frankly I think Barry blinked. He would have loved to issue an outright ban on every firearm and every bullet but his Dem. buddies saw the writing on the wall and told him he had better not.
So for now, the 2nd amendment is safe, and Obama did nothing impeachable. As Mark Levin said, those ‘orders’ were actions he should have been taking all along.


39 posted on 01/17/2013 6:19:38 AM PST by Wiser now (Socialism does not eliminate poverty, it guarantees it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OKSooner

I believe te first to say it was Steve Stockman.


40 posted on 01/17/2013 6:30:41 AM PST by Bainbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: vmivol00

Where is the outrage from Ohio pols or people about the open and blantant voter fraud in Ohio last November?


41 posted on 01/17/2013 6:31:03 AM PST by X-spurt (Republic of Texas, Come and Take It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I cannot think of a name

You have been reading the dem/lib playbook.


42 posted on 01/17/2013 6:33:15 AM PST by X-spurt (Republic of Texas, Come and Take It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: vmivol00
RE :”Did I miss something or was this just another GOP pretend to have guts moment?”

They are the pretend party. I guess their primary voters love that.

Besides. Did any of the EOs actually do anything?

43 posted on 01/17/2013 6:39:25 AM PST by sickoflibs (Losing to O is NO principle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bainbridge

Yes, thanks, that sounds right but I don’t think he’s from Texas. Not sure but I don’t think so.


44 posted on 01/17/2013 6:42:41 AM PST by OKSooner ("The grace of the Lord Jesus be with God's people. Amen." - Revelation 22:21)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: vmivol00

Stockman - He is one of the few with a backbone.

I think we can all agree that Obama walked back from the edge when he issued his press release/ signed his orders.

The worst parts were vague (background check upgrades), and what Obama did not do was the real story. (No import bans, no administrative changes to NFA, making semi-autos equal to full autos, which was floated)

I’d say Stockman deserves a ‘thank you.’


45 posted on 01/17/2013 6:42:41 AM PST by Triple (Socialism denies people the right to the fruits of their labor, and is as abhorrent as slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OKSooner

So much for Okie smarts.
Louie represents East Texas, not the “hill country”. You are dead-on otherwise. Louie quit school on account of recess, he just don’t play.

Don’t remember hearing anything saying he was going to file for impeachment, although he damn well might.

The 2nd Amendment overpowered the WhiteyHut yesterday. Just the thought of 100 million armed patriots was enough to get the indo-kenyan queer and his joker plugs to blinking like they were in a sand storm.


46 posted on 01/17/2013 6:45:52 AM PST by X-spurt (Republic of Texas, Come and Take It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: MamaTexan
Obama's dog & pony show didn't 'affect' anything...

Not blatantly altering gun ownership, but he's setting the stage to have political opponents' mental health questioned.

BTW, don't you think O is a better gun salesman that practically anybody? He sure has boosted that sector of America's economy.
47 posted on 01/17/2013 6:46:40 AM PST by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: chrisnj

We didn’t “win” yesterday - both sides are regrouping for counterattacks. The only way to “win” to get each and every gun control law repealed in the entire US, from the city/county level on up.

Don’t let down your guard, as these sneaky bastards will hit us all when we least expect it. And there’s no such thing as a ‘fair fight’.


48 posted on 01/17/2013 6:46:59 AM PST by Biff55 (If you run too far from the Alliance you end up in Reaver territory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: vmivol00
None of the EOs actually do anything.

Ubamugabe blinked.

49 posted on 01/17/2013 6:49:46 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (TYRANNY: When the people fear the politicians. LIBERTY: When the politicians fear the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MamaTexan

Exactly.

There has to be an executive order that causes an impeachable event/law/action.


50 posted on 01/17/2013 6:52:39 AM PST by old curmudgeon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson