I curse you. May your faggot ass end up in a dark alley when a group of Obama's people want to have their way with you and the police are only minutes away.
If two to four is enough, then I’m sure that all of the police in NY would gladly get rid of their high cap sidearm and get derringers.
So doe he extend the same standard to the Secret Service, FBI, and all sundry LEO’s? Or does he intend to only limit law abiding homeowners? Because we all know that the criminals will use the liberal idiot standard of the Second Amendment and will only arm themselves with single shot muskets and pistols. I want to hear him direct all armed security personnel around him to load only three or four rounds into their weapons.
Nadler neither knows nor cares about citizen defense needs. He is another Democrap pol whose agenda overwhelmed his brain.
Nadler conveniently forgets the issue of black Urban Feral crowds attacking whites. A high capacity pistol magazine might well keep the closer Ferals distant enough to allow reloading with one still in the barrel. Maybe.
One lady, in a news story, shot her peep 5times, all of them being good body mass hits. He was still in position to carry out his intents.
What a f'n idiot statement this is.
What about a home invasion robbery involving 3 or 4 armed individuals?
Then he brings up armored car drivers?
Huh?
And wtf do people hunting have to do with any of this? Why is he playing stupid?
He you little middle class tax paying peons, all you need a 2 or 3 shot gun....If that isn't enough for you and your families safety, too damn bad!
You're just going to have to die...Stupid tax payers....
How about we ban arrogant cowflop eating bloated slobs?
What an f’ing idiot!
What an ignore-rammus.
And his protection? How many bullets are they allowed?
i guess that's all the cops need then too... right???Conservatives and supporters of the 2nd amendment the Obama regime is using the 2nd amendment argument to blame gun owners for its inability to deal with the hundreds of gangland murders and shootings commited in areas under their solid control using illegally obtained firearms. Their solution to those inner city problems is to remove those rights provided by the constitution to have and bear arms from all US citizens.
None of those 19 so called “reforms” and unconstitutional efforts being edicted by who some call an emporer do not deal with the following issues briefly outlined below . They won’t because instead of creating a uniformly democratic society where every citizen has an equal voice no matter what their race or ethnicity.
Their policies have grouped races and ethnic groups by gerrymandering congressional districts where much of this criminal activity occurs. GOPES {goverment of the people (republican party) elites} see this issue as a 3rd rail because most of it is black on black or illegal vs illegal (Mexican) activity . GOPES are also afraid to say that policy may have also increased racial tension but again GOPES accept this because of the influence of mainline socialist media which would be accusing them of “racism” if they dare to question it.
The following are links to New York publications the first is the New York Times
January 12, 2013 4:34:43 PM · 49 of 73
mosesdapoet to 2ndDivisionVet
Revolutionary Language by C.M.Blow of the New York Times
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2977484/posts with link to article
As the ghouls swoop in on Blow’s inflamatory rhetoric promoted by The New York Times with directionless rebuttal or meaningless responses laughed at by its staffers. I’m.not even sure if a C.M.Blow is even listed on the NYT staff
I submit the purpose of this NYT article is to keep the right and conservatives focused on what the Demo-Coms describe as issues through their propaganda arm known as the MSM (mainline socialist media) not on the problems created by the “Libs” on their road of good intentions or the socialist/fascists/communists successors to comtrol over todays Democrat party :
Not one word in Blow’s NYT inflamatory contribution will address or offer a solution about the hundreds of gangland murders and shootings using illegaly obtained mostly handguns and revolvers .Not “assault weapons” which are really single shot per trigger pull rifles, used for small game hunting or target practice. That are made to look like their military counterpart. which by the way are small caliber and designed to wound not necessarilly kill which is why they are automatic and fire many rounds while the trigger is in the pulled position. .
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2977901/posts NY Post pix of shooter using handgun
Blow certainly can’t critique a system created by his ilk .Ignored by his publication is that when once caught, perps get set free with lenient sentencing from “liberal” judges or sob sister plea bargain prosecution promoted by The New York Times. There’s certainly no criticism of “no snitch” mentality partcularly in areas where these shootings are rampant.
What do you expect an honest look at the problem from The New York Times ? They’re incapable that’s why they’re going broke...Printing tripe from people like C.M.Blow
While attempting to deal with the latest diversion by the Demo-Coms who would if they had their druthers eliminate the constitution period not just the 2nd ammendment. Conservatives and defenders of the 2nd amendment should cite these issues mentioned here. Holding their fire and aim this when they see the whites of their eyes.
Police: And just why did you shoot the perp 8 times?
Miss: I ran out of ammo before I could shoot him 16 times.
Two to the center of mass, one to the head - all in self defense. Not enough capacity, Jerry. None of your beeswax.
Liberals never allow facts to interfere with their theories.
It would take an elephant gun to make a dent in nadler. A normal rifle would be like a mosquito bite. That might, or might not, be a bit of an exaggeration, but I think wierd thoughts sometimes.
First and foremost, it ABSOLUTELY DOES NOT MATTER WHAT I NEED OR DON'T NEED. Nowhere in the Bill of Rights does it say these rights are predicated on a demonstrated need. No-one asks if you need a Facebook account with more than 10 friends to exercise your right to free speech. The BoR specifies the rights necessary for an individual to remain free and have liberty. Without them we have tyranny. Not tyranny at some point in the future when (not if) the government does something and we have no defense against it. No, when we surrender any of the rights in the BoR then we have tyranny right here, right now. I will not dishonor the memory of tens of thousands of true Americans that have gone before me whose sacrifices ensured we continue to have these freedoms.
Second of all, we absolutely do need the very best technology to defend ourselves and our loved ones. Yes, that includes "military style" and the so-call "assault weapons." Are we not equipping our soldiers with the best technology to defend themselves? Why should we not similarly have the best technology? Who are you - or anyone for that matter - to say what is "good enough" for me to protect myself and my family? You want to come over and take the airbag and seatbelt away from the passenger side of my car? Hey, one seatbelt and airbag is enough, right? Wrong. Want a more specific example? How about the mother who recently defended herself and her twins from an attacker - shooting six times for 5 hits with a .38 - and the perp still got up and drove away! Getting 5/6 hits under stress is pretty darn good shooting. Even at that it wasn't enough to completely ensure her family's safety. Note that the average home invasion is now being done by a crew of 3. If I've got to put a few rounds into each one, and I'll probably miss a few times... Yeah, I absolutely need that 15 round mag in my Glock and that 30 round mag in my AR.
So yeah, Nadler, actually we do need these kinds of weapons and features. More to the point though, we absolutely, positively, must have the freedom to own them if we choose. "...shall not be infringed." is pretty clear on that.
Molon labe!
One bullet to be carried in the pocket is all you get