Yep, 2 defense shots for the public. But the cops will then fire 156 rounds at a single unarmed suspect who reaches for a cell phone. But that’s OK. They are cops.
Or maybe 41 shots at an unarmed guy in a dark doorway. That’s OK too. They are cops. Lots of shots.
But Joe Public, we get 2 shots in self defense.
I don’t recognize my nation anymore.
“Hunters don’t use large ammunition clips”
ARGH. Another idiot who doesn’t know the difference between a clip and a magazine. ARGH.
“If you’re defending yourself against a robber…if you have a pistol permit...two or three or four shots should be enough—period.”
Spoken like someone who has never handled or fired a handgun in his life. It ain’t like the movies, Jerry baby. The good guys don’t always hit with the first shot, and the bad guys don’t always go down right away. Especially if they don’t get hit in center of mass the first time or two.
The New YOrk City record for a perp survivng with hits from service pistols is:
21 rounds. The guy survived.
It would probably take an elephant gun to take that fat ass down.
If each thug, g-man or dog killer would carry a gun with only 2 or 4 shots, I’ll be happy with one that holds 20 or 40 shots. I might be a little nervous so I want at least a 10 point advantage. Then add another 10 for each additional thug.
And if he was specifically asked if citizens can use firearms for self defense he would equivocate, knowing full well his sociopathic base full of weirdos, kooks and not least of all anti-white racists loath the notion of people being able to defend themselves.
Dear Rep. Nadler:
With all due respect to the position that you hold, I, not YOU, will decide how, what and with what I will defend myself, my family and my property, sir. You’re entitled to your opinion, but we are not your subjects. We are citizens and have a God-given and Constitutional right to defend ourselves as we see fit. With that said, why don’t you go find another pastrami sandwich somewhere and leave such important issues to real men.
This is not about crime. Everyone should stop at once responding to this kind of crap (spouted by fascist morons) as if it were. The ONLY response is "the 2nd amendment guarantees us the right to protect ourselves from the government". He can take his crime argument and shove it.....deep.
Four shots would be far to few to take down Jerry. Maybe an elephant gun could do it in two shots.
Nadler’s primary concern is that citizens can’t kill more than one or two of his constituents at a time, otherwise they’d have to work harder to steal elections.