Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Marriage is safest place for pregnant women: study
Life Site News ^ | 12/20/2012 | Thaddeus Baklinski

Posted on 12/21/2012 5:12:20 AM PST by IbJensen

TORONTO, December 20, 2012, (LifeSiteNews.com) - A new study of Canadian women finds that pregnant women who are married suffer less partner abuse, substance abuse, and post-partum depression than women who are cohabitating or single.

Dr. Marcelo Urquia, an epidemiologist at St. Michael’s Hospital in Toronto, found that about one in 10 married women (10.6 per cent) suffered partner abuse, substance abuse, or post-partum depression. However, 20 per cent of women who were cohabitating but not married suffered from at least one of those three conditions.

The figure rose to 35 per cent for single women who had never married—and to 67 per cent for those who separated or divorced in the year before birth.

“We did not see that pattern among married women, who experienced less psychosocial problems, regardless of the length of time they lived together with their spouses,” Dr. Urquia said.

Dr. Urquia said understanding the differences in abuse and depression between married and cohabitating partners was important as the number of children born outside marriages rises.

The study was based on data from the 2006-7 Canadian Maternity Experiences Survey, a national survey of 6,421 childbearing women compiled by the Public Health Agency of Canada.

Dr. Urquia found that the longer a cohabitating but not married woman lived with the same partner, the lower her risk of partner/substance abuse or depression.

“What is new in this study is that for the first time we looked at the duration of unmarried cohabitation and found the shorter the cohabitation, the more likely women were to suffer intimate-partner violence, substance abuse, or post-partum depression around the time of conception, pregnancy, and delivery,” he said.

He cited current data which shows that 30 per cent of children in Canada are born to unmarried couples, up from nine per cent in 1971. He also noted that in several European countries, births out of wedlock outnumber those to married couples.

According to the UK’s Office for National Statistics, 47.2 per cent of the babies born in England and Wales in 2011 were born to parents who were not married or in a civil partnership.

Dr. Urquia concluded that research on maternal and child health would benefit from distinguishing between married and unmarried cohabiting women, and their duration of cohabitation.

His study, titled “Marital Status, Duration of Cohabitation, and Psychosocial Well-Being Among Childbearing Women: A Canadian Nationwide Survey,” was published in the December issue of the American Journal of Public Health.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: abortion; abortuaries; killingbabies; murder
Pregnant young girls don't need a father for their baby or a husband. The kind arms of the abortuary worker reach out for her and deliver her baby to the dumpster and her to a life of misery and bitter reflection.

Satan and Planned Parenthood: made for each other.

1 posted on 12/21/2012 5:12:34 AM PST by IbJensen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
Marriage is the safest place...??

Who knew....??
*eye-roll*

/SARC

2 posted on 12/21/2012 5:22:05 AM PST by Wings-n-Wind (The main things are the plain things!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

later


3 posted on 12/21/2012 5:52:25 AM PST by quintr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

How safe is it for the poor husband?


4 posted on 12/21/2012 6:20:12 AM PST by mikey_hates_everything
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

Amazing people pay for information that right in front of their noses


5 posted on 12/21/2012 6:31:06 AM PST by Popman (Gun control will not really control guns, but it will give the illusion of controlling people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Popman

Well, the cost of the study might have been worth it — at best it will convince some few of the sort of folks who venerate science that marriage is worth defending, at worst, we can cite it, then when it is sneered at by “progressives” accuse them of being anti-science.

(If it weren’t so tragic for our society because it is believed in so many quarters with baleful consequences at the ballot-box, the accusations of the left that we on the right are “anti-science” would be risible — the left is absolutely impervious to empirical evidence that actually bears on political and social matters, yet purports to be “pro-science”.)


6 posted on 12/21/2012 7:52:29 AM PST by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson