Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Democrats will never nominate a white person again for POTUS
11.07.2012 | barryobi

Posted on 11/07/2012 4:49:51 PM PST by barryobi

We need to come to grips with what the democrats are doing. They have cracked the code and the implications for our country are too terrible to contemplate. The democrats are about power, first and foremost. They could care less who sits in the White House. As long as they can get their liberal, socialist agenda enacted, they are fine with whomever occupied the White House.

The democrats have cracked the code. They know they will get 90% plus of the black vote, 70% plus of the hispanice vote, and 40% or so of the white vote. With the changing demographics in our country, if the democrats continue to nominate black candidates, they can be assured of winning because they know that the so called 'swing states' like Wi. NC, Va., Fl., and Oh are easily won if the black turnout is juiced up by nominating a black candidate.

If we look at Wisconsin for example, even though Republicans WON an increasing majority in both the state assembly, state senate, AND re-elected the FIVE Republican Congress members whioh is more than the Three Democrat members who we have, they still trounced Romney in the POTUS election and elected the MOST liberal member of Congress to the US Senate.

How did they accomplish this? Only five months ago, Scott Walker won his recall 53-47. Obama won the state easily by getting the inner city black and hispanics to turn out and vote big for him.

Just like I predicted on FR before the election, if the votes were under 2.75 million Romney would probably win. The votes were over 3 million and Romney lost by 200k votes. The entire difference was made up by increased minority and youth voters.

We need to recognize the reality of the demographics and adjust accordingly. By that I mean we have three choices.

1. Go after the single female vote by somehow moderating the stance on contraception.

2. Go after the hispanic vote by moderating the stance on immigration.

3. Go after the black vote. How we do this without offering reparations I am not sure. All I know is that even if we nominate a black candidate for POTUS or VP it would probably not make a bit of difference because the black community is hooked on the entitlements the Democrats have showered on them. From SNAP to Obama phones, to section 8 housing, the blacks are like crack addicts, they have given up and become wards of the state.

I wish I had another solution, but the reality of what the democrats are doing to keep power hit me like a ton of bricks this morning. Unless we figure out a way to counter the demographic trends, we can kiss the White House goodbye.

One last point, I can predict right now that the next nominee for POTUS the democrats will put up is probably Deval Patrick, Obama's old buddy from Chicago who is Gov. of Mass.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: obama; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: jobim

“Good analysis. Good and sobering. I agree. Even an exceedingly incompetent but
somewhat charismatic Black will work. No short supply of those.”

Jesse Jackson jr?


21 posted on 11/07/2012 5:22:10 PM PST by ari-freedom (Election Day should be after Thanksgiving, not right after Halloween)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dalebert
"... our politicians imported enough minorities to finish us off. it s over."

Our white Democrat and leftist Republican politicians. Think Ted Kennedy and RINO's.

22 posted on 11/07/2012 5:24:09 PM PST by StormEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
23 posted on 11/07/2012 5:24:11 PM PST by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: barryobi

I had the same exact thought today. You are exactly correct. It will never be a white male again. They will start with blacks but then any permutation of minority and woman will be tried.


24 posted on 11/07/2012 5:24:17 PM PST by frogjerk (Obama Claus is coming to town!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: barryobi

LOL! They have been planning this for a long time. That is the purpose of open borders (illegals in the millions) and multiculturalism (cementing foreign group tribalism with no clue about freedom with hatred, resentment and envy against rraaacis whitey.) Americans have been invaded and conquered; not by the invaders, but by the socialist elite of both parties).

The Rinos in the GOP want to join the dems but the targeted native whites who vote for them (conservatives) won’t go along with their own enslavement.


25 posted on 11/07/2012 5:24:57 PM PST by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Winning for winning’s sake alone seems to me to miss the point entirely.


26 posted on 11/07/2012 5:25:23 PM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: barryobi

I’m going to agree that #2 is the likeliest best opportunity. Blacks and Hispanics are not generally united in their views save for electoral politics. Blacks are invested in the libdems plantation. Highlighting a rift between blacks and hispanics might help to send a good portion to our side.


27 posted on 11/07/2012 5:25:23 PM PST by Sgt_Schultze (A half-truth is a complete lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: barryobi

This morning my dad surmised that the 2016 Dem nominee will be a half black, half Hispanic lesbian, and that we will lose that race, too.

Demographics. We are done.


28 posted on 11/07/2012 5:25:54 PM PST by LittleSpotBlog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: barryobi

The Republicans aren’t likely to have an all white ticket again either.

Demographically, this country has become far friendlier to Democrats. To remain a viable party, the Republicans will adjust. Conservatives aren’t going to like that adjustment, but it is what it is.


29 posted on 11/07/2012 5:27:12 PM PST by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears
These things have a way of working themselves out eventually. Naziism no longer has much cachet in Germany, although it took a world war and a destroyed continent to achieve that result. The cheerleaders and scribes who enabled it went down with the ship.

Google "Julius Streicher" if you want more details.

If you want still more details on the current end game, then read the Book of Revelation.

30 posted on 11/07/2012 5:29:08 PM PST by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: barryobi

Democrats? It’s not only Democrats who will never nominate another white. Republicans won’t, either. Mark my words, George W. Bush was our last white male President. From now on, every presidential ticket will look like a team on the evening news. When was the last time you saw two white males as a news team? Huntley and Brinkley?

Face it. It’s over for whites. If this is what it’s like when we’re still the majority, imagine when we’re a minority, (which will be real soon.)

For the first time in my life, I’m glad I have no kids or grandkids.


31 posted on 11/07/2012 5:30:17 PM PST by Nea Wood (When life gets too hard to stand, kneel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: willywill
"From SNAP to Obama phones, to section 8 housing, the blacks are like crack addicts, they have given up and become wards of the state."

And I expect there will soon be Obama Cadillacs -- straight from Obama's Government Motors.

32 posted on 11/07/2012 5:31:22 PM PST by StormEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws
Let ALL the Bush cuts expire. Let sequestration hit. Obama owns it.

Do you really believe that? The Dims will place blame squarely on the "do nothing Republican obstructionists in the House" (their term). I've already heard that meme being used when the topic of sequestration comes up. I'm sure its been focus-group tested and found effective.

33 posted on 11/07/2012 5:33:01 PM PST by Bernard Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: barryobi

So if the ‘pubs become EVEN more like the marxist party, they will win? Nope. They will lose by more and become irrelevant, if they already haven’t this time.


34 posted on 11/07/2012 5:34:28 PM PST by dynachrome ("Our forefathers didn't bury their guns. They buried those that tried to take them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter; cripplecreek
Winning for winning’s sake alone seems to me to miss the point entirely.

Agreed; CS Lewis said it this way:

    The woman who makes a dog the centre of her life loses, in the end, not only her human usefulness and dignity but even the proper pleasure of dog-keeping.
    The man who makes alcohol his chief good loses not only his job but his palate and all power of enjoying the earlier (and only pleasurable) levels of intoxication.
    It is a glorious thing to feel for a moment or two that the whole meaning of the universe is summed up in one woman—glorious so long as other duties and pleasures keep tearing you away from her. But clear the decks and so arrange your life (it is sometimes feasible) that you will have nothing to do but contemplate her, and what happens?
    Of course this law has been discovered before, but it will stand re-discovery. It may be stated as follows: every preference of a small good to a great, or partial good to a total good, involves the loss of the small or partial good for which the sacrifice is made.

    …You can’t get second things by putting them first. You get second things only by putting first things first.

35 posted on 11/07/2012 5:35:54 PM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: barryobi

They likely will not nominate a white male for a good while. They will need to pick an hispanic, a woman etc in some order before they go with a white male again.

This well could hamper them in the future.


36 posted on 11/07/2012 5:36:16 PM PST by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: barryobi

This will only work for a while. The country will be completely unable to repay its debts in less than ten years. In that time the dollar will be replaced, and the Yuan will be the new international currency. Neither Obama nor any other democrat will do anything to fix this, and it will cause a massive depression. When things really get serious, and they will, all bets are off as to whether either party can survive.


37 posted on 11/07/2012 5:36:37 PM PST by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: barryobi

No republican has ever gotten liberals to vote for them, and win because he tried to be more liberal like his opponent. We aren’t the real deal, the libtards want to vote for liberals. MSM, no matter how moderate, turns the pubbie evil, and democrat, good.

It’s a known losing strategy and we proved it in 1996, 2008 and 2012.


38 posted on 11/07/2012 5:41:56 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: barryobi

You are probably right. Here in Virginia the black rural precincts and smaller black cities were jam packed with voters.


39 posted on 11/07/2012 5:42:01 PM PST by palmer (Jim, please bill me 50 cents for this completely useless post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: barryobi

The best thing we can do is to get out of democrat run areas, and when they implode, they will take many of themselves out way before they become target practice for decent people. Their own ineptness will decimate their own numbers.

The next thing to fight against is regionalism, which is the libs way of tryingto get money from people who don’t live under their control.


40 posted on 11/07/2012 5:44:38 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson