Posted on 10/13/2012 11:42:46 AM PDT by IbJensen
Federal officials on Friday approved a plan that sets aside 445 square miles of public land for thedevelopment of large-scale solar power plants, cementing a new government approach to renewable energy development in the West after years of delays and false starts.
At a news conference in Las Vegas, Interior Secretary Ken Salazarcalled the new plan a "roadmap ... that will lead to faster, smarter utility-scale solar development on public lands."
The plan replaces the department's previous first-come, first-served system of approving solar projects, which let developers choose where they wanted to build utility-scale solar sites and allowed for land speculation.
The department no longer will decide projects within the zones on a case-by-case basis as it had since 2005, when solar developers began filing applications. Instead, the department will direct development to land it has identified as having fewer wildlife and natural-resource obstacles.
The government is establishing 17 new "solar energy zones" on 285,000 acres in six states: California, Nevada, Arizona, Utah, Colorado and New Mexico. More than half of the land — 153,627 acres — is in Southern California.
Interior also established 19 million acres — nearly 30,000 square miles — of so-called "variance zones" that will allow developers to propose solar projects in those areas. Environmental and other review of projects proposed in variance zones would be handled on a case-by-case basis.
The Obama administration has authorized 10,000 megawatts of solar, wind and geothermal projects that, when built, would provide enough energy to power more than 3.5 million homes, Salazar said.
Secretary of Energy Steven Chu said the effort will help the U.S. stay competitive.
"There is a global race to develop renewable energy technologies — and this effort will help us win this race by expanding solar energy production while reducing permitting costs," Chu said in a statement.
The new solar energy zones were chosen because they are near existing power lines, allowing for quick delivery to energy-hungry cities. Also, the chosen sites have fewer of the environmental concerns — such as endangered desert tortoise habitat — that have plagued other projects.
Environmental groups like the Nature Conservancy that had been critical of the federal government's previous approach to solar development in the desert applauded the new plan.
"We can develop the clean, renewable energy that is essential to our future while protecting our iconic desert landscapes by directing development to areas that are more degraded," said Michael Powelson, the conservancy's North American director of energy programs.
Some solar developers that already are building projects were complimentary of the new approach, saying it will help diversify the country's energy portfolio more quickly.
Still, some cautioned that the new plan could still get mired in the same pattern of delay and inefficiency that hampered previous efforts, and they urged the government to continue pushing solar projects forward.
"The Bureau of Land Management must ensure pending projects do not get bogged down in more bureaucratic processes," said Rhone Resch, president of the Solar Energy Industries Association.
Salazar said the country four years ago was importing 60 percent of its oil, and that number has dropped to 45 percent today.
"We can see the energy independence of the United States within our grasp," he said.
I would say that none of it is due to solar power. Solar power replaces coal and natural gas. It does not replace oil.
Wind power KILLS EAGLES! Where are the environazis on this? Why aren't they screaming?
Coming from Salazar it’s mostly bull crap. Any increase in domestic oil production is due solely to the State of South Dakota and the amazing oil boom that’s hit there.
Coming from Salazar it’s mostly bull crap. Any increase in domestic oil production is due solely to the State of North Dakota and the amazing oil boom that’s hit there.
The federal givernment OWNING ANY land in ANY State is obscene.. and pure socialism..
Incorrectly identified the state as South Dakota. I thought I caught it in time but, somewhow, both posts hit the thread at the same time
Incorrectly identified the state as South Dakota. I thought I caught it in time but, somewhow, both posts hit the thread at the same time.
Sorry for the hiccups. I don’t understand what happened.
Salazar is the guy who led the fight to shut off oil shale development. Oil shale will never happen as long as he is in office.
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=0f8_1235673139
Don't know if its true...but it would make sense from China's viewpoint
This is one of those rare situations where the bunny-huggers will come to the rescue. The land they’re talking about is prime Desert Tortoise habitat.
I thought public lands were set aside to prevent development, to maintain a natural environment. Not to be paved over in solar cells.
They don’t care as, long as it is their great god Obunghole who is doing it. The American people keep getting locked out of more and more of their public lands while Obungholes cronies get rich.
CAN YOU SAY AGENDA 21 ?
I think that so-called "public lands" in most states actually belong to the wretched federal gvernment. Texas is the only state that I am aware of that retained the right to control its public lands when it became a state.
How many millions acres did he declare off limits for any kind of development or mining and such?
__________________________________
Most of Utah IIRC. And Utah has put the federal government on notice that it is reclaiming those lands.
There needs to be grid backup to aupport these solar panels
and wind turbines. These energy sources are extremely ineffient to begin with, what happens when the panels wear
out and have to be replaced? What happens when the turbines
fail and need repair?
Its even less practical because they can not store wind energy.
Also, they cannot store solar energy either: it has to be fed into the grid.(sorry, I sholod have done a spell check on my last post)
Let's just hope THESE companies don't go bankrupt.
Why not consider returning all this land to the states? I doubt that the Feds got it with each legislature's permission for its state's land, as stipulated in the Constitution.
Scientists link magnetic reversal, climate change and super volcano to same time period
Global Warming on Free Republic
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.