Posted on 09/25/2012 2:04:40 PM PDT by NYer
Ping!
my tax dollars at waste.
Poor Mitt. The inventor of the $50 Romneycare abortion is being beaten up by Planned Parenthood.
Sucks to flip-flop, eh, Mitt?
These child murderers will convince few
Government unions and groups like Planned Parenthood, which received Federal funding should be banned from any type of political advertising.
As a matter of fact...that sounds like a nice bill that President Romney can sign in his first year.
“Sucks to flip-flop, eh, Mitt?”
Funny, I used to get that thrown at me about Reagan all the time. Deja Vu. Some things never change.
his lfielong love affair with abortion bites him back
Who use to throw that at you about Reagan? They could not have been well informed. ORomney, on the other hand, is famous for it.
If PP cares so much about women, then why aren’t they using this money to help women?
Oh, right, they don’t. They care about money. Gotta spend money to make money.
where do they get the money to do this?
Oh dear
and after he was a big name donator too...
“Babies died to produce this ad. And we at planned parenthood approve that message. “
Only when a woman has the “right” to kill nascent human life in her womb is she truly liberated. /s
Yes Regan admitted he used to be a democrat but once he switched parties his convictions did not change. I supported him for Gov. and he had the same positions when he ran for Pres. Romneys position on all most issues changed from the time he was Gov. In fact they have already changed from the time he was nominated.
At least now we know why they wanted taxpayer dollars.
This way they don’t have to donate any of their own money to a losing cause.
How about a law that institutions receiving taxpayer money can’t donate to candidates for office or take out ads during elections?
No you didn't.
“No you didn’t.”
Hahahaha. OK. I guess you would know best what I hear, Swami.
“Yes Regan admitted he used to be a democrat but once he switched parties his convictions did not change.”
That will; take a while to digest. You mean once he changed, he didn’t change, because he wasn’t the kind of guy who changed? Well, I guess if he wasn’t the kind of guy who could change, why believe anyone else will? Or did you just decide to be a contrarian to the bitter end? Is that a chnage for you?
Everyone here knows that you are lying when you try to compare the anti-Reagan Mitt to Reagan, the conservative hero.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.