Posted on 09/12/2012 5:02:21 AM PDT by Triple
The *Verification of Birth* is missing a “.” at the end of item 2.
It’s an improper statement.
Technically and legally the document is invalid.
You’re saying a court would reject that document out of hand because one of the clauses is missing a period?
I downloaded the White House document and viewed it in Foxit Reader, as suggested in the article. I noticed that the 1 in the serial number seemed to pop into the image slightly late (I was using Remote Desktop into a Windows box, exaggerating any display delays). I see similar effects when I examine PDFs of documents I myself scanned. It's no big deal — it's just how the software works.
But the real point is, we don't have to rely on document analysis to refute or confirm the document. We now have Dr. Onaka's official authentication. It might not be good enough for the birthers, but it will stand up just fine in court.
Tell it to the judge.
Old lawyer saying: De minimis non curat lex.
His response was that he had no time for doing it. Yet he had time to troll Dr. Con's web site.
In addition to two layers mentioned above, Obama’s birth certificate pdf file contains another anomaly: one layer contains only security background and nothing else.
Can you provide steps to replicate creation of a document having these three characteristics?
I win.
Yes.
I downloaded Obama’s birth certificate also.
It’s a forgery.
You would need to have manure for brains not to realize it.
Oh... and this John Woodman? ... LOL
The Faux Claims of John Woodman Regarding the “Natural Born Citizen” Clause
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2867724/posts
Computer whiz...
Constitutional legal expert..
And master over the simple-minded. rotflmao
Then you’d be mistaken.
Thank f**k for Google (old I.T. saying).
Your opinion and two bucks will buy me a cup of coffee.
Well with such a high value set of opinions you’ll have no problem posting a link showing our court system declaring legal documents to be invalid if they lack a period, right?
“But the real point is, we don’t have to rely on document analysis to refute or confirm the document. “ - CW
What are you going to believe your lying eyes (and the evidence) or a legalese statement from the HI bureaucrats?
Sounds like you put your trust in the word of government over the scientific process.
- not very rational of you
“Well with such a high value set of opinions you’ll have no problem posting a link showing our court system declaring legal documents to be invalid if they lack a period, right?”
Aren’t your the one that said.. Thank f**k for Google (old I.T. saying).
So.... is you’re google broken or are you just lazy?
your for you’re...
These people are paid to go into conservative blogs to make Obama’s Birth Certificate problem go away.
But it hasn’t gone away. Which means they have failed miserably.
It’s still fun to play with them and make them look like idiots.
I know why you're reluctant to provide any backup for that post. We all do. After all, why spend time trying to find that which doesn't exist. There's still time to man up and admit the truth. No one will think that badly about you.
It can be fun...
There are many papers showing how bad the forgery is. I perfer the Monckton paper the best...
I think Monckton did the best job exposing the fatal flaws in the WHLFCOLB.pdf.
(perfer...where did *that* come from?)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.