Posted on 09/12/2012 5:02:21 AM PDT by Triple
Long-Form Birth Certificate of Obama is a Forged Document
A note of explanation
Since this is a site of Science and technology, there is a need to explain why this site dedicates a page to expose forgery about a document related to Mr. Barack Hussein Obama. Mr. Obama is the President of the USA that is currently the leader of the Free World, and the most powerful country in the Western hemisphere. In his position as the President, the policies pursued by Mr. Obama affects the whole world and not just the USA.
Because of the persisting controversy about his eligibility, On April 27, 2011 the Office of the President at the White House released a document that is called "Long-Form Birth Certificate". The release of this simple document, after two years of controversy, raised in our minds the possibility that there could be something suspicious about the information available on this document. To check this, we downloaded the document that was posted at the White House site at http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf.
The analyses presented below reveal without a doubt that the Long-Form Birth Certificate of Mr. Obama is a fabricated, fake and forged document.
The publication of such a blatantly fake document about something so basic as the birthplace of Mr. Obama, should raise great concern about the suitability of the person who is holding the reigns on the most powerful country of the World.
Moreover, the lack of action on the part of the members of the United States House of Representatives and Senate, as well as the courts of the United States, despite many previous appeals to these three branches of American government, also raise a concern about how the governmental institutions of the reputedly best, and certainly the most important democracy in the Free World have avoided this issue.
Below, we present two different means by which the PDF document of Long-Form Birth Certificate of Mr. Obama can be examined.
Analysis of the document using Foxit Reader
A PDF document can be read by many different type of programs freely available. Here we used Foxit Reader version 4.3.1 that can be downloaded from the Foxit web site.
Instructions to check the document:
Download the document from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf Open the PDF document using Foxit Reader.
Zoom into the document 800%. Scroll down until you see the serial number of the document "61 1064" in the top right-hand side of the document. In full page view the number appears as "61 10641". But, after magnification, the last digit "1" disappears! This last digit is also in a font that is different from the other digits. This is only one example. Many more examples can be discovered by examining magnified document with full page view of the document. In brief, this simple analysis using just a viewing software reveals that the PDF document has been doctored by a graphics software.
Analysis of the document using Inkscape, a vector graphics software.
Reservations could be raised about the results of imaging by Foxit Reader noted above. As an independent test of the composition of the "Long-Form Birth Certificate" of Obama, the PDF file was also examined by an open source freely available Inkscape (version 0.48.1) graphics software.
Instructions to check the document:
Download the document from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf Import the PDF document using Inkscape. Unmark the two options in order not to modify the document.
In vector graphics software, an image is composed of elements. If the "Long-Form Birth Certificate" of Obama was a photocopied document then it should not be composed of separate parts. To reveal if the document has parts, click on the image opened. The status line at the bottom of the software reports that the image is composed of "2 objects" that have been grouped. To "ungroup" image components click Ctrl-Shift-G or select Object>Ungroup. For a second time, again click on the image and to "ungroup" image components click Ctrl-Shift-G or select Object>Ungroup. The status line at the bottom of the program reports that the image includes 9 objects.
Again click on the image and for a third time to "ungroup" image components click Ctrl-Shift-G or select Object>Ungroup. This time you see the outlines of nine rectangles marking the boundaries of the 9 objects.
The most important object among the 9 objects that are revealed is shown below.
(image at source - not sure how to get it to appear here)
Comparing the object above with the original document, it is seen that in the top right-hand corner of the document the last digit "1", of the serial number of the form "61 10641" is missing. This repeats the same observation as seen in the simple magnified view of the document in the PDF Foxit Reader (see above).
These are just a few of the problems with this document. There are many other problems with this document that you can read about in various documents and web sites such as:
An expert analysis of the typography and layout of elements in the Long Form Birth certificate by Mara Zebest.
An expert analysis of the typography and layout of elements in the Long Form Birth certificate. Full report by Mara Zebest.
News Conference of Sheriff Joe Arpaio's "Cold Case Posse" revealing that the birth certificate is fake
Why Obama's Birth Certificate Matters, Especially Now
From A to Z: What's wrong with Obama's birth certificate?
'Irrefutable' proof of Obama forgery
Criminal complaint charges Obama birth record 'forged'
Experts: Registrar stamps confirm Obama forgery
A tale of two birth certificates
Obama Blinked! Released His Long Form BC! Or DID HE? - Many Questions Still!
That birth certificate is phony
Hidden messages in Obama's birth certificate
Layered colors 'simple proof' of Obama document forgery
Comparison of the typography of Obama BC reveals that it is forged
The *Verification of Birth* is missing a “.” at the end of item 2.
It’s an improper statement.
Technically and legally the document is invalid.
You’re saying a court would reject that document out of hand because one of the clauses is missing a period?
I downloaded the White House document and viewed it in Foxit Reader, as suggested in the article. I noticed that the 1 in the serial number seemed to pop into the image slightly late (I was using Remote Desktop into a Windows box, exaggerating any display delays). I see similar effects when I examine PDFs of documents I myself scanned. It's no big deal — it's just how the software works.
But the real point is, we don't have to rely on document analysis to refute or confirm the document. We now have Dr. Onaka's official authentication. It might not be good enough for the birthers, but it will stand up just fine in court.
Tell it to the judge.
Old lawyer saying: De minimis non curat lex.
His response was that he had no time for doing it. Yet he had time to troll Dr. Con's web site.
In addition to two layers mentioned above, Obama’s birth certificate pdf file contains another anomaly: one layer contains only security background and nothing else.
Can you provide steps to replicate creation of a document having these three characteristics?
I win.
Yes.
I downloaded Obama’s birth certificate also.
It’s a forgery.
You would need to have manure for brains not to realize it.
Oh... and this John Woodman? ... LOL
The Faux Claims of John Woodman Regarding the “Natural Born Citizen” Clause
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2867724/posts
Computer whiz...
Constitutional legal expert..
And master over the simple-minded. rotflmao
Then you’d be mistaken.
Thank f**k for Google (old I.T. saying).
Your opinion and two bucks will buy me a cup of coffee.
Well with such a high value set of opinions you’ll have no problem posting a link showing our court system declaring legal documents to be invalid if they lack a period, right?
“But the real point is, we don’t have to rely on document analysis to refute or confirm the document. “ - CW
What are you going to believe your lying eyes (and the evidence) or a legalese statement from the HI bureaucrats?
Sounds like you put your trust in the word of government over the scientific process.
- not very rational of you
“Well with such a high value set of opinions you’ll have no problem posting a link showing our court system declaring legal documents to be invalid if they lack a period, right?”
Aren’t your the one that said.. Thank f**k for Google (old I.T. saying).
So.... is you’re google broken or are you just lazy?
your for you’re...
These people are paid to go into conservative blogs to make Obama’s Birth Certificate problem go away.
But it hasn’t gone away. Which means they have failed miserably.
It’s still fun to play with them and make them look like idiots.
I know why you're reluctant to provide any backup for that post. We all do. After all, why spend time trying to find that which doesn't exist. There's still time to man up and admit the truth. No one will think that badly about you.
It can be fun...
There are many papers showing how bad the forgery is. I perfer the Monckton paper the best...
I think Monckton did the best job exposing the fatal flaws in the WHLFCOLB.pdf.
(perfer...where did *that* come from?)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.