Long-Form Birth Certificate of Obama is a Forged Document

Since this is a site of Science and technology, there is a need to explain why this site dedicates a page to expose forgery about a document related to Mr. Barack Hussein Obama. Mr. Obama is the President of the USA that is currently the leader of the Free World, and the most powerful country in the Western hemisphere. In his position as the President, the policies pursued by Mr. Obama affects the whole world and not just the USA.

Because of the persisting controversy about his eligibility, On April 27, 2011 the Office of the President at the White House released a document that is called "Long-Form Birth Certificate". The release of this simple document, after two years of controversy, raised in our minds the possibility that there could be something suspicious about the information available on this document. To check this, we downloaded the document that was posted at the White House site at http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf.

The analyses presented below reveal without a doubt that the Long-Form Birth Certificate of Mr. Obama is a fabricated, fake and forged document.

The publication of such a blatantly fake document about something so basic as the birthplace of Mr. Obama, should raise great concern about the suitability of the person who is holding the reigns on the most powerful country of the World.

Moreover, the lack of action on the part of the members of the United States House of Representatives and Senate, as well as the courts of the United States, despite many previous appeals to these three branches of American government, also raise a concern about how the governmental institutions of the reputedly best, and certainly the most important democracy in the Free World have avoided this issue.

Below, we present two different means by which the PDF document of Long-Form Birth Certificate of Mr. Obama can be examined.

A PDF document can be read by many different type of programs freely available. Here we used Foxit Reader version 4.3.1 that can be downloaded from the Foxit web site.

Download the document from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf Open the PDF document using Foxit Reader.

Zoom into the document 800%. Scroll down until you see the serial number of the document "61 1064" in the top right-hand side of the document. In full page view the number appears as "61 10641". But, after magnification, the last digit "1" disappears! This last digit is also in a font that is different from the other digits. This is only one example. Many more examples can be discovered by examining magnified document with full page view of the document. In brief, this simple analysis using just a viewing software reveals that the PDF document has been doctored by a graphics software.

Reservations could be raised about the results of imaging by Foxit Reader noted above. As an independent test of the composition of the "Long-Form Birth Certificate" of Obama, the PDF file was also examined by an open source freely available Inkscape (version 0.48.1) graphics software.

Download the document from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf Import the PDF document using Inkscape. Unmark the two options in order not to modify the document.

In vector graphics software, an image is composed of elements. If the "Long-Form Birth Certificate" of Obama was a photocopied document then it should not be composed of separate parts. To reveal if the document has parts, click on the image opened. The status line at the bottom of the software reports that the image is composed of "2 objects" that have been grouped. To "ungroup" image components click Ctrl-Shift-G or select Object>Ungroup. For a second time, again click on the image and to "ungroup" image components click Ctrl-Shift-G or select Object>Ungroup. The status line at the bottom of the program reports that the image includes 9 objects.

Again click on the image and for a third time to "ungroup" image components click Ctrl-Shift-G or select Object>Ungroup. This time you see the outlines of nine rectangles marking the boundaries of the 9 objects.

Comparing the object above with the original document, it is seen that in the top right-hand corner of the document the last digit "1", of the serial number of the form "61 10641" is missing. This repeats the same observation as seen in the simple magnified view of the document in the PDF Foxit Reader (see above).

These are just a few of the problems with this document. There are many other problems with this document that you can read about in various documents and web sites such as:

An expert analysis of the typography and layout of elements in the Long Form Birth certificate by Mara Zebest.

An expert analysis of the typography and layout of elements in the Long Form Birth certificate. Full report by Mara Zebest.

News Conference of Sheriff Joe Arpaio's "Cold Case Posse" revealing that the birth certificate is fake

Are you relying on half truths and shallow arguments because they represent the full extent of your capacity to comprehend? Or, is it because you care more about persuading people that you’re right than you do about getting to the truth by carefully delving into the strongest arguments of those who oppose your view.

If I were a person who cared primarily about rhetoric and sophistry, I too would say something like, “It’s been proven time and time again that scanned documents often have layers.” And then when someone started to pin me down about the details of this particular layer pattern, I would say, “Now, honestly the digital file doesn’t really matter at all because Hawaii has come right out and said that what is on the White House is the real thing.”

If you were a person deeply concerned about getting to the truth on this issue, wouldn’t you want to be wrestling through the best evidence on either side. Wouldn’t you want to concede (if for no other reason than to attest to your own intellectual honesty) that in truth no one has yet gone on record with a good explanation of how a document with the particular kind of layering (such as the presence of more than one single-bit layer) can be produced simply through normal scanning and conversion processes? Come on, I’ve confronted you about this once; sharpen your argument. “Scans produce layers,” just isn’t good enough anymore, and I’m going to be expecting better out of you!

Then onto your “Besides, those silly layers don’t matter anyway, given what the HDOH has said.” Yes, I too would take that approach here if all I cared about was persuading a bunch of the least discerning people that sometimes read these boards. But surely you have loftier goals than that?

So in light of that, I just know that you’re going to get that hand back down and bury that head of yours in your research, and you’re going to spend some real quality time deciding how it is that we can expect anything but evasive legalese and weasel words from government officials in Hawaii, given their track record thus far.

Again, just so we can have some peace of mind as we spend our valuable time rebutting and attempting to reason with you, help us to know that logic and reason are actually worth something to you. Please take some time to explain why we should not be concerned in the least by Governor Abercrombie’s definitive statement that “It’s actually written down in the archives” and Loretta Fuddy’s 8-weeks of verbiage negotiations and delays with Ken Bennett before finally, reluctantly releasing a “verifcation” that has substantially different wording than the next version of the verification to eventually arise from the HDOH’s shadowy situation room.

After you fill us in on how to add all that up as innocent and normal, take a moment clear up what Nagamine meant when she told Mike Zullo, “Yes, but you still have a valid driver’s license!” Don’t know what I’m talking about? Better get back to your studying. After all, it’s the truth you care about isn’t it? Oh and by the way, why has Hawaii decided that it would just be all too bad for them to release the birth certificate of long deceased Virginia Sunahara to her brother. Wasn’t it on the basis that it’s just to brittle to photocopy? So concerned were they about that brittleness that they paid real money to fight Duncan Sunahara in court! Now why was that all perfectly within reason again?

You see, if you’re going to get me to come around to the truths you’ve carefully distilled out of all this, you’ll have to get me past my childish notions that just maybe the Hawaii government has behaved as something less than a paragon of honesty, transparency, impartiality and forthrightness.

I think the last time I tried to help you along, I mentioned that I don’t have a lot of time for web forum conversations. Let me now add that if the best you can manage is to keep trying to lead us to the truth with fluff like this, I may just give up on you completely.

Now hit those books, and give me something to think about. I’ll do my best to humbly receive your instruction as soon as you start guiding me through the meatier challenges of this debate.

“Lot’s of scans make layers, and besides the boyscouts in the Hawaii government came right out and told us everything is okay.”

No more of that here, please. No thank you.

Of course not. I just wanted to bring sharp focus on the fact that cynwoody is not trying to get to the bottom of this. For one reason or other, she is merely trying to keep others from considering that Obama may be hiding behind a forgery and suborning perjury.

For reference, here is my post that exposed (as I'm sure numerous others have done better than me) cynwoody on the layers issue. And for those who are curious, her brilliant response follows somewhere farther down the thread. You can see that she has no excuse to again spew this drivel of hers.

I really am able to appreciate and be challenged by the arguments of someone who completely disagrees with me on this issue--when I have a smidgen of evidence that he is both intelligent and genuinely interested in getting to the truth. I confront myself all the time with what I consider to be my opponents' best arguments, and find myself wondering if I'm enslaved my own bias or if I've missed something important. I've been wrong before, and I will be again. On certifigate, the conclusion I've reached thus far still just seems inevitable to me. Sometimes I go looking for a conscientious friend whom I can beckon to beat some sense into me on this, but alas I just can't seem to be "brought to my senses" by their valiant, but tragically deficient attempts.

But then, perhaps to my discredit, a deceptive propagandist like cynwoody can also sometimes provoke me to come out of my shell and say a "few" words.

In any case, thanks for that advice. I'll keep breathing, while cynwoody slips away to some other thread where she will keep trying to confuse people, hoping no one will be quick to call her out.

Are you guys following the logic here?

CYNWOODY: Scans often make layers, besides Hawaii says the white House pdf is accurate to the original in their files.

ECINKC: Never those kinds of layers, and Hawaii has a distinct pattern of deceptive word games and double talk when it comes to Obama’s documents.

CYNWOODY: Okay, mister smartypants why don’t you just tell us all then how Hawaii has managed to pull-off this conspiratorial hoax for 51 years?

—

One of the things that helped me get really interested in the eligibility controversy in the first place was the number of people who started popping up at FreeRepublic under the pretense of being conservatives making posts purporting to offer sober discretion and urging people with questions that seemed legitimate to just stop doubting Obama’s birth narrative. I might have believed they were innocently misguided or ill-informed until I saw that they simply weren’t engaging in principled arguments.

People who employ logic like cynwoody’s and who refuse to learn when reasonably corrected only serve to strengthen my resolve that Obama and his followers are genuinely worried that eventually the truth will be uncovered.

I propose that the reason liberals don’t hesitate to employ deceptive rhetoric is because they subscribe to a world view in which nothing is truly right or wrong and thus, for them, the end justifies the means. If their “little white lies” will help to move socialists into positions of power, then by all means they must lie, lie, lie! It’s the only way they can save us from ourselves, since we are not able to grasp their high-minded insights on our own.

Since you’ve decided you’re not even going to try, cynwoody, please just stop right now. Trickery and empty deceit are unbecoming for anyone; so, begin looking for pursuits in life that are noble and honorable, instead.

Who knows? It may not yet be too late for you to change your ways.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.