Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Winning the AGW Science Debate: Here's How
American Thinker ^ | August 30, 2012 | S. Fred Singer

Posted on 08/31/2012 9:14:36 AM PDT by neverdem

The upcoming election battles may be unique in offering for the first time a debate about global warming. Neither Bush-Gore nor McCain-Obama chose to discuss the issue -- maybe because they were not really that far apart. By contrast, Barack Obama has already announced that, if re-elected, he will make climate change an important priority -- while Paul Ryan is an assertive skeptic on AGW (anthropogenic global warming).

The science of climate change is not just of academic interest, but has been leading to policies for large-scale changes in energy use and supply -- with important economic consequences. The burden of proof for AGW therefore falls on those who call for such policies. They must demonstrate with reasonable certainty that human activities are causing global warming, that a future warming will produce significant economic and ecological damage, and that it would be more cost-effective to mitigate now rather than to adapt later. They must also be ready to respond to any critique of the underlying science.

A recent example of irresponsible AGW claims is a just-released statement by the American Meteorological Society -- the same crew that cannot predict the weather three days in advance. The concluding section begins:

There is unequivocal evidence that Earth's lower atmosphere, ocean, and land surface are warming; sea level is rising; and snow cover, mountain glaciers, and Arctic sea ice are shrinking. The dominant cause of the warming since the 1950s is human activities. This scientific finding is based on a large and persuasive body of research. The observed warming will be irreversible for many years into the future, and even larger temperature increases will occur as greenhouse gases continue to accumulate in the atmosphere. Avoiding this future warming will require a large and rapid reduction in global greenhouse gas emissions...

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: agw; climate; climatechange; cooling; denier; globalwarming; globalwarminghoax; warming

1 posted on 08/31/2012 9:14:44 AM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Any story that contains the phrase

scientists predict that in 20 years......

is pure propaganda. All honest competent scientists will admit that

a. we don’t understand all the parameters affecting the atmosphere.

b. Even assuming a was false, There isn’t enough computing power in the universe to run a climate simulation that would give meaningful result.


2 posted on 08/31/2012 9:20:51 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

CLIMATE CHANGE FRAUD: Global temperatures have been declining for 2000 years when you don't use the fraudulent data used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

The Tree Ring Data Scandal

New tree ring study shows 2000 years of cooling

Extreme weather is an integral part of the Earth’s climate

3 posted on 08/31/2012 9:24:40 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Government is the religion of the sociopath.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
An excellent summary.
4 posted on 08/31/2012 9:28:50 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (The Slave Party Switcheroo: Economic crisis! Zero's eligibility Trumped!! Hillary 2012!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DManA

If anyone can tell me:

How many hurricanes will make landfall during the remainder of this season and their strength when they do,

or

What the total snowfall will be for Lexington, KY this winter,

or

When the Long Rains will start and end and total rainfall in Western Kenya next Spring,

or

Explain why all the “NEW ICE AGE-WE’RE DOOMED” predictions of the 1970’s failed,

or

The increase/decrease in grain production in the Central Plains next year,

then I will respectfully listen when they try to tell me about climate 20 years or 50 years from now.


5 posted on 08/31/2012 9:31:56 AM PDT by BwanaNdege (Man has often lost his way, but modern man has lost his address - Gilbert K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; Ernest_at_the_Beach

Dr. Singer kills “settled science” here without even touching upon the many scientific frauds perpetrated by warmers, from bogus tree ring studies (all emanating from the Yamal region), Mann’s famously stabile “hockey stick” program, or the continued reliance upon a surface temperature measurement data-set that is obviously flawed and biased, despite the existence of a validated data-set said sources do not mention.


6 posted on 08/31/2012 9:33:42 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (The Slave Party Switcheroo: Economic crisis! Zero's eligibility Trumped!! Hillary 2012!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

If the left’s assertion that AGW is causing increased warming. Why did they have to DOCTOR THE BOOKS. They got caught and it’s all became obvious it was nothing but POLITICAL SCIENCE these frauds were shoveling. Just another SOCIALIST DEMOCRAT charade to fool the people into milking more tax money out of us into their pockets.


7 posted on 08/31/2012 9:50:19 AM PDT by spawn44 (MOO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Photobucket
8 posted on 08/31/2012 10:19:03 AM PDT by preacher (Communism has only killed 100 million people: Let's give it another chance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

WattsUpWithThat.com posted a stunning article on 30 August 2012.

It’s based on a new paper published in the journal “Global and Planetary Change”....

(1) Changes in atmospheric CO2 occur after - not before - an increase in temperature.

(2) This agrees with earlier findings from ice core samples.

(3) The ESSENTIAL theoretical sequence of heating in “Man Made Global Warming” is atmosphere to land to ocean.

(4) This paper states the sequence of heating we now have is actually ocean to land to atmosphere.

(5) If this paper can be verified by other researchers, it means our current global warming is being caused by the SUN heating earth’s oceans, and NOT by CO2 trapping heat in the atmosphere.


9 posted on 08/31/2012 10:54:42 AM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen
Important paper strongly suggests man-made CO2 is not the driver of global warming

Thanks for the WattsUpWithThat.com reminder. I got a new computer.

10 posted on 08/31/2012 2:58:58 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy; Joe Brower; Cannoneer No. 4; Criminal Number 18F; Dan from Michigan; Eaker; Jeff Head; ...
"Fast and Furious" Failure Fosters Favoritism for Finagling Fed

Election 2012: America Will Never Be the Same - if Obama wins and is free to pursue his inner Che

The Last Compromise (Walter Russell Mead)

THE UNSEEN CLASS WAR THAT COULD DECIDE THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION

Some noteworthy articles about politics, foreign or military affairs, IMHO, FReepmail me if you want on or off my list.

11 posted on 08/31/2012 4:37:21 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; Rurudyne; steelyourfaith; Tolerance Sucks Rocks; xcamel; AdmSmith; ...

Thanks neverdem.


12 posted on 08/31/2012 5:10:22 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Thanks for the ping!


13 posted on 08/31/2012 9:09:06 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
No matter the evidence irrational people (those who believe in AGW) cannot be swayed. Most dems are completely irrational and deranged.

The solution is not something that can be discussed.

14 posted on 09/01/2012 4:34:54 AM PDT by raybbr (People who still support Obama are either a Marxist or a moron.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

—bflr—


15 posted on 09/01/2012 6:26:08 AM PDT by rellimpank (--don't believe anything the media or government says about firearms or explosives--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson