Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: chessplayer

How many rounds did they squeeze into bystanders after the guy was dead? 10 feet seems close enough that that the first couple shots should have already done the job.


5 posted on 08/24/2012 8:29:48 PM PDT by Slump Tester (What if I'm pregnant Teddy? Errr-ahh -Calm down Mary Jo, we'll cross that bridge when we come to it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Slump Tester

CNN has the shooting video. Cops had to do it.


8 posted on 08/24/2012 8:34:33 PM PDT by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Slump Tester

The police panicked. They were not well trained, or perhaps they were simply psychologically unfit for the job.

I do love the NYT’s sympathetic treatment of the police’s decison to shoot in a crowded street.

Now, if instead of 2 of NY’s finest it had been a “civilian” with concealed carry license who did this shoot, can anyone believe that the tone of the article would have been remotely similar?

Maybe this is evidence that the police should be disarmed - they are too great a threat to those they are supposed to protect.


11 posted on 08/24/2012 8:37:19 PM PDT by achilles2000 ("I'll agree to save the whales as long as we can deport the liberals")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Slump Tester

Teach them to shoot .45ACP; that will stop a man dead in his tracks. Why use a 9mm when .45ACP is available? Just increases the odds the bad guys lives too long. Of course it pre-supposes the police can shoot to begin with.


12 posted on 08/24/2012 8:38:55 PM PDT by rustyboots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Slump Tester

And you have been in how many gunfights? No amount of training can prepare any police officers for this sort of thing.


18 posted on 08/24/2012 8:45:23 PM PDT by doc1019 (Given my choices, I will not be voting this time around.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Slump Tester
It appears the LEOs who following the shooter did not have their weapons drawn until the shooter turned and pointed his gun at them.

Just saw a better video and it appears to substantiate that.

Begs the question, if your following someone on foot who you were told just murdered someone, would you not have your weapon already in your hand?

It would seem if they had their weapons already in hand their shots would have likely been much better placed, as opposed to quickly drawing and firing.

This is what the video seems to depict.

38 posted on 08/24/2012 9:04:24 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Slump Tester

“How many rounds did they squeeze into bystanders after the guy was dead? 10 feet seems close enough that that the first couple shots should have already done the job.”

Exactly, We had a similar situation here in Danville, CA where the cops thought a guy in a car in a service station late at night “was going for a gun in his glove compartment,” so they opened fire to the tune of 24 rounds, twelve of which hit and killed the motorist. Luckily it was late at night so the only damage ( other than that inflicted on the motorist ( who died at the scene) were holes in the station itself. Never did get the real story about the supposed existence of a firearm. Cops are trigger happy when then get the chance.


76 posted on 08/24/2012 10:57:36 PM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson