Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nice Try: Obama Released Restrictive New Energy Plan Under Cover of SCOTUS, Holder Contempt
Townhall.com ^ | July 2, 2012 | Kate Hicks

Posted on 07/02/2012 5:17:45 PM PDT by Kaslin

File this one under While You Were Out: the Obama Administration unveiled its new five-year energy plan on Thursday, when the rest of us were conveniently preoccupied with SCOTUS and the Holder contempt vote. Real smooth.

Of course, it's pretty clear why they wanted this to fly under the radar: as Hot Air's Erika Johnsen noted on Saturday, the plan is just not good. She points out that it opens up a miniscule percentage of our offshore resources, but not nearly enough to make a dent in our energy use, and what's more, by constraining the number of jobs that this could produce, it does nothing to help the economy. Some details:

U.S. oil companies will be allowed to drill in more areas of the Gulf of Mexico but won only limited access to the Arctic under the final version of the Obama Administration's five year drilling plan that was slammed by industry and some environmentalists.

The 2012-2017 plan calls for three potential lease sales in areas offshore Alaska but the auctions would not be held until the final years of the plan because of environmental concerns about operating in the Arctic.

"Today, the Obama Administration has announced a bleak future for American energy production by keeping 85 percent of America's offshore areas under lock and key and refusing to open any new areas to drilling," said Doc Hastings, Republican chairman of the House Natural Resources Committee.

The plan calls for 15 potential lease sales in six offshore areas, including in the Western and Central Gulf of Mexico, and the portion of the Eastern Gulf not currently under Congressional moratorium.

Indeed, the plan is so bad that it's been panned by everyone, from the GOP to hard-left environmentalists (who, ironically, think it's too permissive) -- but interestingly, it's produced a fair amount of unity in the Virginian Congressional delegation. Sen. Jim Webb, a Democrat, has joined with his Commonwealth brethren to oppose the president's restrictive plan:

Republicans pounced on President Obama on Thursday afternoon for his administration’s failure to include Virginia in the final five-year plan for offshore oil and gas drilling.

But it wasn’t just Republicans complaining. Sen. Jim Webb (D) joined the bipartisan dissent.

“I regret that the administration failed to include Virginia in its proposed final five-year lease plan,” Webb said. “Energy exploration . . . would boost domestic energy production, while benefiting the commonwealth’s economy.”

The plan announced Thursday postpones drilling off Virginia’s coast until at least 2017.

Obama had announced that Virginia would become one of the first East Coast states to drill offshore. But the administration postponed lease sales after the spill and never included Virginia in subsequent plans.

The last study of the Atlantic Ocean by the federal government, conducted two decades ago, estimates that at least 130 million barrels of oil and at least 1.14 trillion cubic feet of natural gas could be off Virginia’s coast. That’s equal to the amount of oil used in six days and the amount of gas used in less than a month in the United States.

Errr, so is this what an "all of the above" energy plan looks like?

Here's a fun fact, though: the government has restricted Virginia's right to drill offshore because they don't know for certain that there's oil to be found...and they don't know that there's oil to be found because there are federal restrictions on doing the necessary research. From the same story:

Many experts think tests in similar geographic areas in other parts of the world and limited seismic work off Virginia’s coast indicate that there is far more oil and natural gas offshore, although no one has been able to show accurately what is there because of federal restrictions.

Efficiency!

Indeed, the fact that the Obama administration released the plan on one of the busiest news days in recent history is all the more reason to take a look at it now. It's yet another reminder of the damage four more years could do, both to energy policy and job growth.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: barackobama; energyplan; noenergy; obamaenergyplan; offshoredrilling

1 posted on 07/02/2012 5:17:53 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Don’t think I have ever seen a government looter so very good at destroying the folks who make his posh lifestyle possible. Perhaps he could return to Kenya after he’s done here and finish that hell hole off.


2 posted on 07/02/2012 5:20:36 PM PDT by formosa (Formosa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The plan calls for 15 potential lease sales in six offshore areas, including in the Western and Central Gulf of Mexico, and the portion of the Eastern Gulf not currently under Congressional moratorium.

Having paid for the leases, is there any guarantee they'd actually be given permission to drill?

Having seen the way O gives with the right hand and takes it back with the left, I'd say these leases are only of value if he leaves office.

3 posted on 07/02/2012 5:22:58 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Encourage your congressman to get on board with the Defending America’s Affordable Energy & Jobs Act.

Tim Walberg legislation to take global warming regulations away from EPA is gaining supporters

http://blog.mlive.com/citpat/news_impact/print.html?entry=/2012/06/tim_walberg_legislation_to_tak.html


4 posted on 07/02/2012 5:24:47 PM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Until all natural resource extraction is/are placed under a national security umbrella, the greens and libs will always find a way to limit them.

Make it an NS issue by EO (assuming we ever get a President with sense and guts) and be done with all of it. Nothing trumps national security. Not the Supremes, the greens or the libs. Good luck to the fool trying to say it does.


5 posted on 07/02/2012 5:36:46 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

Edit /clarification./ Good luck to the fool who thinks green BS does trump NS. Let them try selling that to anyone.


6 posted on 07/02/2012 5:39:42 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek; Kaslin; All

Cripplecreek, I didn’t see a bill number at the link. It is H.R. 750.

Bill text is here for those who are interested

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:H.R.750:

Thank you for the heads up!


7 posted on 07/02/2012 5:50:02 PM PDT by KGeorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: marron

This is one of the big problems isn’t it? We can’t plan on a thing. We lurch from one extreme to another with increasing amplitude from one day to the next and one administration to another.

We never can count on anything. The rule of law and the good of the nation as a whole has been destroyed as concepts.

We have become Brazil was. Nobody there could plan for anything. They were constantly off balance. Just like we are now.

The United States has turned to shit as a place for investors, capitalists and dreams. It has become one of the worst business climates from the stand point of regulation and taxation in the World.

The British were able to rule India with so few troops because of the uniform application of the rule-of-law with equally uniform application of stern penalties. It mostly applied to everyone equally for crimes. Sure, there were the exceptions of rank and privilege but for the most part the subjects felt things were equitable. One thing the bureaucrats of the India Company had right was consistency. It worked for a long time.


8 posted on 07/02/2012 5:50:47 PM PDT by Sequoyah101 (You've been screwed by your government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, Ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/


9 posted on 07/02/2012 5:52:28 PM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KGeorge

The sad thing is that he entered the bill in February of 2011 and it still hasn’t made it to committee in a REPUBLICAN CONTROLLED HOUSE!


10 posted on 07/02/2012 6:05:34 PM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: KGeorge; All
Here is a better link

H.R. 750: Defending America’s Affordable Energy and Jobs Act

11 posted on 07/02/2012 6:06:59 PM PDT by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

According to the link I posted the bill had only 2% chance of being enacted


12 posted on 07/02/2012 6:13:53 PM PDT by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I guess all the Commies have “5 Year Plans”. Does it matter just what nobama’s plans are? Hopefully, he will be in Leavenworth in shackles soon.


13 posted on 07/02/2012 6:38:21 PM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I guess all the Commies have “5 Year Plans”. Does it matter just what nobama’s plans are? Hopefully, he will be in Leavenworth in shackles soon.


14 posted on 07/02/2012 6:38:42 PM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I guess all the Commies have “5 Year Plans”. Does it matter just what nobama’s plans are? Hopefully, he will be in Leavenworth in shackles soon.


15 posted on 07/02/2012 6:38:42 PM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Thank you, Kaslin! Searches aren’t usually my forte. (But I heartily agree that this is a good time to poke our lawmakers)

@Cripplecreek- with the jobs billS & no telling what else.
The RNC needs to get the facts out there.


16 posted on 07/02/2012 8:12:09 PM PDT by KGeorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks Kaslin.
17 posted on 07/03/2012 4:25:38 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: KGeorge
(H.R. 750)
18 posted on 07/03/2012 6:30:46 AM PDT by yoe (Proud to be part of the Tea Party movement.....!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson