Posted on 06/04/2012 9:54:14 AM PDT by massmike
Document everything. There is a story from a few years back of a little old lady in Suffolk county MA that had the police chief stop by to ask if he could put up a campaign sign. She told him no. Less than an hour later a marked police car pulled in the driveway, Three uniformed police got out and put up the sign. They told her to leave it up "If you know what's good for you."
Unfortunately, there was no evidence of this and no witnesses dared to come forward.
And this is a JUDGE who’s running. So much for the American justice system.
This pseudo-judge saying ANYTHING like what she said about removal of signs put without permission on someone’s property makes her by definition unqualified.
If Eomney stooges tried to put oner of Romneys signs in my yard that way, and threatened me like they did that old lady, the sign would have been tossed out on the street before they could exit my driveway...
This is not MASS...
I don’t think they were ON his property.
“to find several of Cruz campaign signs in front of his property. “
The beating was wrong, no matter what.
He’s Anglo, they’re Hispanic. Nothing new for northern NM where Anglos are very much in the minority.
Good Point!
“Officials with the Taos Police Department say they are still working to get to the bottom “
Translation: Ignoring it and hoping it goes away.
NM list PING!
I may not PING for all New Mexico articles. To see New Mexico articles by topic click here: New Mexico Topics
To see NM articles by keyword, click here:New Mexico Keywords
To see the NM Message Page, click here: New Mexico Messages
(The NM list is available on my FR homepage for anyone to use. Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from the list.)
Forward!
The story is a bit unclear. But it does seem the signs were either “on” his property or “in front of” his property.
In either case he had the right to remove them since the signs were illegally placed.
The usual rule is that campaign signs have to be “on” a persons property and cannot be on the “right of way” in front of a person’s property.
Liars, thieves and thugs are all that is left in the Democrat Party. Let one of those Democrat punks TRY putting one of their stupid signs anywhere near my yard and I will give them a well earned lesson in common courtesy and consideration for others. It will be a lesson they will not soon forget.
What begins?
I would like to see a 2nd confirmation that the signs were put near his property and not on his property. If they were in his property, I hope he sues for millions. If they weren’t then I hope they at least arrest the mob thugs who put the signs there and castrate them for the completely unnecessary assault on the homeowner.
You’re the first to make the salient point....where the signs on the guy’s property? If not he may have been wrong in removing them.
If it’s a public right of way, the abutting land owner does not have the right to remove the signs during the election season. There may even be a fine for doing so.
I don't know about the state in the article, but in Mi a property owner owns, and is taxed, to the center of the road. The public has a right to walk or drive on the ‘right of way’ but beyond that it is trespassing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.