[Secret Agent Man]

You better watch posting this stuff - graphic description of gay acts to make a larger point, will get you banned by some mods here.

[JDW11235]

“Homosexuals indulge in incredible, unbelievable, vile, vulgar, even violent activities detrimental to themselves and society such as fisting (don’t ask); rimming (don’t ask again); illegal drug use; eating or rubbing their bodies with a lover’s feces; autoerotic asphyxiation (about 1,000 die each year); sadomasochism, urine drinking; golden showers (water sports); insertion of bottles, flashlights and other objects up a “lovers” rear; and other repulsive activities. I would love to hear a defense of those activities. “

I don’t justify a single one of those practices, but there are an increasingly large number of straight people that do all of those things too. I have many friends in the medical field, and I’ve heard a number of stories, and they all involved males and females together, or “straight people” by themselves.

Sexual sin has a snowballing effect. Anything besides a man and woman, married, leads to a desensitizing of sexual purity. The sky’s the limit, or rather, the pit is bottomless. Sexual morality as a whole is declining, and while the homosexual agenda itself is terrible, if all homosexuality disappeared overnight, the majority (”whole”) of the world (or At least U.S.) would probably lie in sin. I am amazed and appalled by even sitcoms these days. We truly live in dark, dark times.

[Kinder Gentler Machinegun Hand]

Really?

Really????

[lefty-lie-spy]

There are a lot of kinky and nasty heterosexuals out there too, so this is a pretty baseless article, though I agree with your key point. I can tolerate “normal” homosexuals, but effeminate, pansy and public gays really creep me out.

[SootyFoot2]

Agree! Absolutely!! And they recruit new victims to this sick way of life.

[sagar]

Homosexual sex is revolting. Why would any normal heterosexual want to visualize that like the article is doing? Hell, even imagining heterosexual sex is revolting... after all, considering the statistics, an average person is probably overweight bordering on obese.

The only sex that is not revolting to me is my own.

[Free Vulcan]

I find it completely that the liberals hate the economic 1% but absolutely support the sexual 1% and expect the rest of us to do so too.

[TheRhinelander]

Dante’s 8th circle is not a fun place.

[upchuck]

Excellent email from Dr. Boys. Thanks for posting.

He claims, "Homosexuals make up less than 2% of the American population..." I don't know. I have heard 10% (don't have a link). At any rate, it's amazing that such a small minority of our population can have such a large affect.

Here's why:

The first order of business is desensitization of the American public concerning gays and gay rights. To desensitize the public is to help it view homosexuality with indifference instead of with keen emotion. Ideally, we would have straights register differences in sexual preference the way they register different tastes for ice cream or sports games: she likes strawberry and I like vanilla; he follows baseball and I follow football. No big deal.

At least in the beginning, we are seeking public desensitization and nothing more. We do not need and cannot expect a full "appreciation" or "understanding" of homosexuality from the average American. You can forget about trying to persuade the masses that homosexuality is a good thing. But if only you can get them to think that it is just another thing, with a shrug of their shoulders, then your battle for legal and social rights is virtually won. And to get to shoulder-shrug stage, gays as a class must cease to appear mysterious, alien, loathsome and contrary. A large-scale media campaign will be required in order to change the image of gays in America.

That's from 1987. Long time ago. Source.

[RushIsMyTeddyBear]

“and other objects”
____________________________________________________

Those would also include small rodents. No, I’m NOT kidding.

[lbryce]

No,because the homosexual lifestyle is one that is defined by
practices that by its inherent nature is insane.

[45semi]

You forgot 'bug-chasing'

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bugchasing

[867V309]

Will Any Sane Person Defend Homosexual Practices?

You mean like shopping for smart-Alec Baldwin's underwear or Ellen Degenerate's furniture?
I think you could be sane and agree those are acceptable homosexual "practices".

What about the things homosexuals do behind closed doors? I don't defend them, whatever they are. Frankly, I don't care provided they are consenting adults. Just don't tell me about them or ask me to say they're OK, and don't give the racist A. G. Holder a reason to snoop on me.

If you're referring to the Homosexual Agenda, meant to destroy family, marriage and religion, no sane person would defend that practice.

[pallis]

There is no need to get into gay sports to experience the wonderful world of e-coli and other urinary track infections that break down the immune system and create antibiotic resistant bacteria. Some things weren’t intended to be.

[Private_Sector_Does_It_Better]

“Will Any Sane Person Defend Homosexual Practices?”

They hold practices?!?!?!

[devolve]

[Reddy]

“Will Any Sane Person Defend Homosexual Practices? “

Biologically, homosexuality is indefensible. Bottom line, it’s a disorder.

[SWAMPSNIPER]

The drive to "normalize" deviancy is part of an effort to break down our culture, a step down the road to Marxism.

As usual there are plenty of ignorant, well meaning useful idiots pushing things along.

[newfreep]

Kudos to you for posting The Truth about this satanic lifestyle choice.

God Bless!

[starlifter]

You seem to be obsessed with this.

In an unhealthy way.