Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Report: Democrat-controlled Senate laziest in 20 years
Washington Examiner ^ | April 16, 2012 | Paul Bedard

Posted on 04/16/2012 12:47:17 PM PDT by Kaslin

For those who need proof that the Senate was a do-nothing chamber in 2011 beyond the constant partisan bickering and failure to pass a federal budget, there is now hard evidence that it was among the laziest in 20 years.

In her latest report, Secretary of the Senate Nancy Erickson revealed a slew of data that put the first session of the 112th Senate at the bottom of Senates since 1992 in legislative productivity, an especially damning finding considering that it wasn’t an election year when congressional action is usually lower.

For example, while the Democratically-controlled Senate was in session for 170 days, it spent an average of just 6.5 hours in session on those days, the second lowest since 1992. Only 2008 logged a lower average of 5.4 hours a day, and that’s when action was put off because several senators were running for president, among them Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and John McCain.

On the passage of public laws, arguably its most important job, the Senate notched just 90, the second lowest in 20 years, and it passed a total of 402 measures, also the second lowest. And as the president has been complaining about, the chamber confirmed a 20-year low of 19,815 judicial and other nominations.

The Secretary of the Senate’s office didn’t comment on the statistics, but it did provide a comparison to action in 2009, the first term of the 111th Senate, when many of President Obama’s initiatives were considered by the Democratically-controlled House and Senate. By comparison the number of Senate bills offered last year was down 30 percent, the number of amendments offered sank 55 percent, and the number of roll call votes dropped 40 percent.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012; congress; corruption; democrats

1 posted on 04/16/2012 12:47:25 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Congress doing less is not necessarily a bad thing.


2 posted on 04/16/2012 12:52:28 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I wish they were so lazy they didn’t do ANYTHING, but alas...


3 posted on 04/16/2012 12:53:11 PM PDT by Third Person
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I don’t see this as necessarily a bad thing.


4 posted on 04/16/2012 12:53:43 PM PDT by kosciusko51 (Enough of "Who is John Galt?" Who is Patrick Henry?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
For example, while the Democratically-controlled Senate was in session for 170 days, it spent an average of just 6.5 hours in session on those days, the second lowest since 1992.

I'm surprised it's this much, with the benefits, perks, and pay they receive. The conditions are ripe for them to abuse the hell out of their jobs.
5 posted on 04/16/2012 12:53:52 PM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

Hear, hear!! They’ver done far too much in my book.


6 posted on 04/16/2012 1:01:46 PM PDT by 556x45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

Ditto.
I think that, ideally, Congress should be doing nothing at all, unless they’re going start repealing stuff.


7 posted on 04/16/2012 1:05:00 PM PDT by Little Ray (FOR the best Conservative in the Primary; AGAINST Obama in the General.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Lazy senate, lazy pResident.

Seems the only ones who are working are the czars and all we know is that they are up to nothing good.


8 posted on 04/16/2012 1:05:26 PM PDT by 43north (BHO: 50% black, 50% white, 100% RED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

WOW! Y’all beat me to it! Unless they’re repealing a lot of BS laws & regs, I say Hooray for lazy and likewise for gridlock.


9 posted on 04/16/2012 1:10:50 PM PDT by PA BOOKENDS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

Agreed but if only working 170 days, let just pay them for the 170 days. Lets move to a part time congress.


10 posted on 04/16/2012 1:14:52 PM PDT by edcoil (It is not over until I win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

About 80% of them need a looooong vacation...


11 posted on 04/16/2012 1:17:15 PM PDT by Leep (Enemy of the Statist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Rats don’t need to do anything since Barry passes most things by Executive Order or such.

They can just fundraise, fly around , and worship The One.


12 posted on 04/16/2012 1:54:03 PM PDT by TurboZamboni (Looting the future to bribe the present)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy; Third Person

They could be REPEALING laws, deconstructing slob-fat agencies (EPA anyone? Education dept?)....they are just letting the terminal train travel on down the tracks to America’s destruction. For that our forebears would be on the Capitol steps with tar and feathers....or worse


13 posted on 04/16/2012 1:54:19 PM PDT by goodnesswins (2012..."We mutually pledge our Lives, our Fortunes, and our Sacred Honor")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

And McConnell....RIP....is gonna save us all!!!!

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.........


14 posted on 04/16/2012 1:55:04 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

You can also look at it as they haven’t passed as much damaging legislation as they could have the last 10 years. Obamacare was so bad they had enough reserves of bad to last them a few more years, even if they pass nothing else.


15 posted on 04/16/2012 2:03:33 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leep

but Without pay


16 posted on 04/16/2012 2:16:32 PM PDT by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
Congress doing less is not necessarily a bad thing.

100% agreement!

Regards,
GtG

17 posted on 04/16/2012 2:47:20 PM PDT by Gandalf_The_Gray (I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

Yes; McConnell is going to save us. I’m on his mailing list, and he said so. His email was titled: This Cannot Stand. Here’s the take-away quote.:

“I pledge to you that the my[sic] Senate GOP colleagues and I will do everything in our power to stop Obama’s gross abuses of power. Can I count on you to stand with me?”

So I wrote back:

You old blowhard. When have you ever lifted a single finger to protect us from Obama’s abuses? He’s run roughshod over us while you got rich on insider trading. We’re in a world of hurt and you’re sitting pretty. So NOW you’re going to stop Obama?

Just stop with the BS, okay? Nobody believes you any more—and most of us want you defeated in the next election.

Signed, Average Voter


18 posted on 04/16/2012 2:52:35 PM PDT by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter

Almost verbatim what I sent him. I did preface it with” sorry to interrupt your executive nap”

Good job!!


19 posted on 04/16/2012 2:54:47 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

Lol. I envy the line about McConnell’s nap. Plus, maybe we should have ragged him about Viagra. Isn’t there some sort of historical/political connection between the line: ‘this will not stand’, and Viagra?

Or am I confusing G. H. W. Bush w Dole?


20 posted on 04/16/2012 3:08:49 PM PDT by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter

” Isn’t there some sort of historical/political connection between the line: ‘this will not stand’, and Viagra?”

LOL!


21 posted on 04/16/2012 5:24:11 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: PA BOOKENDS
Unless they’re repealing a lot of BS laws & regs, I say Hooray for lazy and likewise for gridlock.

Hmmm ... how about this?

Public law: The Senate must spend the first year of each Congress doing nothing but writing repealers of extant, aged-out, overgrown, or just plain silly legislation from earlier Congresses.

How's that sound?

22 posted on 04/17/2012 2:26:14 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
Especially this particular Senate.

A better descriptor for them would be "most worthless Congress in history."

23 posted on 04/17/2012 2:29:23 AM PDT by Cincinatus (Omnia relinquit servare Rempublicam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker; Fantasywriter
Good job!

Concurring bump.

A former congressional aide once told a group of listeners (including me) always write in your own hand, longhand (manuscript or holographic document) on heavy bond. Staffers sometimes weigh incoming mail on a hot issue as a proxy for counting letters pro and con.

See why e-mail counts for ever so much less?

Oh, and never use company letterhead -- it signals that you had an underling write the letter, which detracts from its significance.

The only address you need is "Senator X of [State], THE CONGRESS, Washington, DC." The Post Office has never lost the Congress in over 200 years; your letter will get through, and jiffy-quick.

24 posted on 04/17/2012 2:36:26 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“Democrat-controlled Senate laziest in 20 years”

Why is that bad?


25 posted on 04/17/2012 2:39:48 AM PDT by monocle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monocle

Well because we have to pay them


26 posted on 04/17/2012 3:25:38 AM PDT by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I t is cheaper to pay them than to pay for the follies they foist on us. Consider their salaries as protection money.


27 posted on 04/17/2012 4:15:04 AM PDT by monocle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“On the passage of public laws, arguably its most important job, the Senate notched just 90”

That’s 90 too many.


28 posted on 04/17/2012 6:54:02 AM PDT by green iguana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson