posted on 04/16/2012 12:47:25 PM PDT
Congress doing less is not necessarily a bad thing.
posted on 04/16/2012 12:52:28 PM PDT
I wish they were so lazy they didn’t do ANYTHING, but alas...
I don’t see this as necessarily a bad thing.
posted on 04/16/2012 12:53:43 PM PDT
(Enough of "Who is John Galt?" Who is Patrick Henry?)
For example, while the Democratically-controlled Senate was in session for 170 days, it spent an average of just 6.5 hours in session on those days, the second lowest since 1992.
I'm surprised it's this much, with the benefits, perks, and pay they receive. The conditions are ripe for them to abuse the hell out of their jobs.
posted on 04/16/2012 12:53:52 PM PDT
Lazy senate, lazy pResident.
Seems the only ones who are working are the czars and all we know is that they are up to nothing good.
posted on 04/16/2012 1:05:26 PM PDT
(BHO: 50% black, 50% white, 100% RED)
About 80% of them need a looooong vacation...
posted on 04/16/2012 1:17:15 PM PDT
(Enemy of the Statist)
Rats don’t need to do anything since Barry passes most things by Executive Order or such.
They can just fundraise, fly around , and worship The One.
posted on 04/16/2012 1:54:03 PM PDT
(Looting the future to bribe the present)
And McConnell....RIP....is gonna save us all!!!!
posted on 04/16/2012 1:55:04 PM PDT
(God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
You can also look at it as they haven’t passed as much damaging legislation as they could have the last 10 years. Obamacare was so bad they had enough reserves of bad to last them a few more years, even if they pass nothing else.
posted on 04/16/2012 2:03:33 PM PDT
by Secret Agent Man
(I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
“Democrat-controlled Senate laziest in 20 years”
Why is that bad?
posted on 04/17/2012 2:39:48 AM PDT
“On the passage of public laws, arguably its most important job, the Senate notched just 90”
That’s 90 too many.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson