To: Kaslin
Congress doing less is not necessarily a bad thing.
2 posted on
04/16/2012 12:52:28 PM PDT by
TomGuy
To: TomGuy
Hear, hear!! They’ver done far too much in my book.
6 posted on
04/16/2012 1:01:46 PM PDT by
556x45
To: TomGuy
Ditto.
I think that, ideally, Congress should be doing nothing at all, unless they’re going start repealing stuff.
7 posted on
04/16/2012 1:05:00 PM PDT by
Little Ray
(FOR the best Conservative in the Primary; AGAINST Obama in the General.)
To: TomGuy
WOW! Y’all beat me to it! Unless they’re repealing a lot of BS laws & regs, I say Hooray for lazy and likewise for gridlock.
To: TomGuy
Agreed but if only working 170 days, let just pay them for the 170 days. Lets move to a part time congress.
10 posted on
04/16/2012 1:14:52 PM PDT by
edcoil
(It is not over until I win.)
To: TomGuy; Third Person
They could be REPEALING laws, deconstructing slob-fat agencies (EPA anyone? Education dept?)....they are just letting the terminal train travel on down the tracks to America’s destruction. For that our forebears would be on the Capitol steps with tar and feathers....or worse
13 posted on
04/16/2012 1:54:19 PM PDT by
goodnesswins
(2012..."We mutually pledge our Lives, our Fortunes, and our Sacred Honor")
To: TomGuy
Congress doing less is not necessarily a bad thing. 100% agreement!
Regards,
GtG
17 posted on
04/16/2012 2:47:20 PM PDT by
Gandalf_The_Gray
(I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
To: TomGuy
Especially this particular Senate.
A better descriptor for them would be "most worthless Congress in history."
23 posted on
04/17/2012 2:29:23 AM PDT by
Cincinatus
(Omnia relinquit servare Rempublicam)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson