[Jim Noble]

It’s true.

Lowry, Ponnoru and Goldberg all published the required denunciations within hours.

[Nervous Tick]

>> It’s true.

Wow.

There’s nothing in the Derbyshire piece that is not factual and backed by proof or evidence.

Shame on Lowry et al. I would say “I’ll never go to NRO”, but the truth is, I’ve been going there less and less anyway due to their Romney-pimping.

Phony conservatives, Manhattan style. A pox on them.

[WashingtonSource]

You mean the “girly men” of National Review? I’m not surprised at anything the do.

[PapaBear3625]

Lowry, Ponnoru and Goldberg all published the required denunciations within hours.

I don't see anything official yet. They may wait until Monday. There's a heavy drumbeat of demand that NR do so, for example this Forbes artice: Why National Review Must Fire John Derbyshire.

The supposedly "right wing" publications still demand that people fall on their swords when they violate any of the real taboos of the Left. The main-stream "conservative" press just makes a pretense of being an alternate point of view.

[9YearLurker]

I saw Lowry’s in the Corner. Do you have links to the others?

[9YearLurker]

Ah, thanks to Twitchy I’ve got a pretty good summary of it:

http://twitchy.com/2012/04/06/john-derbyshires-parental-talk-about-race-sets-off-twitter-firestorm/

[Drew68]

Lowry, Ponnoru and Goldberg all published the required denunciations within hours.

Did any of these denouncers refute Derbyshire's points?

[GeronL]

National Review should be considered a liberal rag from now on.

[kiryandil]

Lowry, Ponnoru and Goldberg all published the required denunciations within hours.

"Lowry, Ponnoru and Goldberg, all good little Progressive Narrative lickspittles, published the required denunciations within hours."

Fixed it for ya.