Posted on 03/17/2012 7:04:37 PM PDT by Steelfish
Instead of responding to Romney's critical view of Santorum, based on reality, one might add, you instead make irrelevant comments about Newt Gingrich's space proposal. That tells me a whole lot about what even Santorum's supporters seek to run and hide from.
“Newt has more visibility in California.”
That just might be his problem. His phenomenal gender gap will be most accentuated in CA, the home of Boxer and Feinstein.
One more time, we agree. What is wrong with this party?
He’s smoking something.
I agree with you as regards California and New York. It’s odd, but if he is nominated it will be largely on the strength of delegations whose states (MA,CA,NY,VT, etc.) he has no chance of carrying in the general election. I’m not sure that is a good indicator.
God we hope not. Illinois voters don’t fail us now.
not going to win...like the guy...it is reality...we have to accept it over here, and adjust
3 or 4 reasons, or a few more
Iowa, North Dakota, Alabama, Mississippi, Colorado, Minnesota, Oklahoma, Missouri (part 1), Tennessee, Kansas
Funny you should say that, because a lot of knowledgeable, powerful experts are doing just that... and have been for awhile. and much of their interest, and many of their concerns stem from national security issues.
since you almost always post stuff about Newt without knowing what the heck you are talking about - I have a clue for you: Newt has said he would like to create an opportunity for the private sector to be let loose in 'space exploration' with little, if any, of the funding coming from the government - mostly prizes, incentives, regulation easing.
Read about what is going on in the real world:
Russia is talking with the US and Europe on plans to create a manned research base on the moon, the head of the Russian space agency Roscosmos said Thursday.
Roscosmos is discussing the possibilities for a permanent moon base with officials from NASA and the European Space Agency, the agency's chief, Vladimir Popovkin said. "We don't want man to just step on the moon," Popovkin told Vesti FM radio station, according to the Ria Novosti news agency. "Today, we know enough about it, we know that there is water in its polar areas ... we are now discussing how to begin [the moon's] exploration with NASA and the European Space Agency." He said the plan was either to set up a base on the moon or launch a station to orbit around it. Russia also is planning to send two unmanned mission to the moon by 2020, Popovkin said. The comments come after a string of high profile space failures by the Russians. On Sunday, the doomed Mars probe Phobos-Grunt plummeted..
http://www.myfoxdc.com/dpps/news/russia-us-moon-base-nasa-dpgonc-20110119-to-_17194074
Chinese moon base 2002:
http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2002/5/22/181737.shtml
I think Rick Santorum would be a great nominee. Honest, smart, and a real fighter.
Supporting RINO ROMNEY openly on FR openly and publicly should earn the poster immediate suspension or banishment from Free Republic. Coming out either now, or after Gingrich suspends his campaign, either way. Anti-thetical to the essence of Free Republic.
Sort of like what is going on here at Free Republic.
LOL! True be that!
And add to that the fact that Santo is now getting hammered non stop with this ad in almost every channel:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=U1KRP6-f7OY
This race is truly bizarre...
“Newt has more visibility in California.”
When Newt came to speak here in 3 different L.A. locations, it was never reported in the local media. Obviously the LA SLIMES will never cover the GOp either which is understandable. Most conservatives who are politically-charged that I know of here in the L.A. area did not even know Newt was in town until we all looked at FR and it was too late..
Rick you ignorant slug. Sumptimes you just sount stoopit.
Do we now need an English class here as well?
Just for the kids.
He’s probably right... “if”... This is intelligent strategy on his part, actually, from a motivational standpoint insofar as his supporters are more apt to be fired up positively by such a bold declaration than Mitt’s would be contrarily. It’s a tall order, and in purely statistical terms unlikely, but stranger things have happened already this cycle.
What’s your problem? Soaring rhetoric? /s LOL
Wonder what you’d call him if he promised “permanent lunar-based colonies within eight years.”?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.