Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Eric Cantor endorses Mitt Romney (Another GOP-e sellout...)
NY Post ^ | 3/4/12 | Newscore

Posted on 03/04/2012 6:37:44 AM PST by jimbo123

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 next last
To: napscoordinator; PSYCHO-FREEP

“You must have been the only one to see it. Nobody else has mentioned such things and the media said that he did good, but Romney did better.”

Straight up ridiculous. There has been much commentary about Rick’s “took one for the team” moment, and his inside Washington explanations of voting for this or that. The vast majority of people that commented agree that Newt easily won, and that is was the beginning of the Santorum slide that continues to this day. You’re not even serious if you think that debate was good for Rick.


81 posted on 03/04/2012 9:46:52 AM PST by trappedincanuckistan (livefreeordietryin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: trappedincanuckistan

You know what? You are delusional if you think Santorum is on the slide and Newt is not. Michigan! Romney home state and Santorum almost took it from him. Newt took the votes from Santorum. Washington....Santorum came in a strong second....Newt was LAST again.....Newt took votes from Santorum AGAIN. Tennessee...Santorum is in first place...Gingrich is in third. Georgia....Newt is in first but it is his state of 20 years and is expected just like Michigan was for Romney. Ohio...Santorum is winning and Newt is in LAST again. So don’t give me your Santorum is falling while Newt is rising. That is not true. You can’t say the last place candidate is winning. It is irrational.


82 posted on 03/04/2012 9:53:39 AM PST by napscoordinator (A moral principled Christian with character is the frontrunner! Congrats Santorum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Where to begin? Rick had a big lead in Michigan then couldn’t even pull it out with liberal Democrats supporting him. Rick did not come in second in Washington. To my knowledge Ron Paul did. Rick is fading fast in Ohio, and doesn’t even have a full slate of delegates. Newt is rapidly closing in the South while Rick is slipping everywhere. Rick has only won caucuses where very few people voted. His campaign continues to sputter because he can’t keep on message, or keep his foot out of his mouth.

It is you who is delusional. Good luck Tuesday!


83 posted on 03/04/2012 10:05:44 AM PST by trappedincanuckistan (livefreeordietryin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: trappedincanuckistan

Good luck Tuesday!

You too.


84 posted on 03/04/2012 10:07:38 AM PST by napscoordinator (A moral principled Christian with character is the frontrunner! Congrats Santorum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist

I have no idea why you’re ragging on me. I have no real problems with Santorum, just prefer Gingrich because I think he’s a more experienced, more accomplished conservative and I especially like what he accomplished as Speaker and his more aggressive plans to Newter our out of control federal government. You can rag on me until hell freezes over, but I’m not changing. And I couldn’t careless about who supports him.


85 posted on 03/04/2012 10:30:52 AM PST by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is not just brewing, rebellion is here!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist

Do you happen to know what it would take to start a NEW party for
2016 election. Is it possible to get this done in a 4 year period of time???? What would be the cost and if WE on this site possibly Sarah,
and some Tea Party groups, is this at all possible???? Do you believe
that the PEOPLE can SAVE our country???


86 posted on 03/04/2012 10:36:00 AM PST by Kit cat (OBummer must go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969; Magic Fingers; Lazamataz
People of good intention and good faith can disagree. I completely understand the heartfelt sentiment to send Zer0 packing back to Chicago. I share it. Believe me, I share it to the depth of my bones.

But I have to consider the net effect on the country. And a liberal RINO who talks a good game but is at his heart a progressive can be MORE destructive than a leftie Dimocrap.

Let me give you an example (courtesy of FRiend Lazamataz ): In New York State, year after year the Democraps would try to pass a state-level assault rifle ban. Year after year, the New York Senate -- held by Republicans -- would shut the attempt down.

Enter George Pataki as NY Governor. An extraordinarily liberal Republican, the very first year the assault weapons ban was resurrected by the Democraps, he immediately began pressuring the Republicans in the Senate to vote for it.

They did. It passed. Pataki signed it.

Pataki accomplished what 6 years of Democrat governors couldn't.

This is why I have this posted on my profile. I understand if you don't agree, but think hard before you make a decision to pull a lever for Myth.

Why I am NEVER voting for Romney, even if he is the GOP nominee (shudder)

Many people, online and in-person, have started to shrug and say, "Oh well. Looks like Romney's gonna get the Republican nomination. I'll have to hold my nose and vote for him, like I voted for McCain.and all the other RINOs the GOP have shoved at us. After all, if he's only 80-90% like Obama then he's at least a little better than him, right?"

WRONG. and here’s why.

If Myth does 90% of what Zer0 does, he will do it WITH AN R NEXT TO HIS NAME.

What does this do? Well, Republicans in Congress who would otherwise balk at lib legislation if it were proposed by Zer0 WILL SIGN ON TO THE LEGISLATION BECAUSE IT IS PROPOSED BY THE LEADER OF THE GOP.

Imagine: amnesty, “tax fairness”, gutting the military and so much more ALL SAILING THROUGH CONGRESS because a “Republican” is at the helm of America. Contrast this with a second Obozo presidency where the GOP will dig in their heels and at least try to fight.

Yeah, I said it. An Obummer presidency is better for America than a Myth presidency (in the way that a cowpie sandwich is better than a meal of broken glass).

This is why we have to have a NOT-ROMNEY at the top of the ticket if we are to have any hope of digging America out of this hole we’re in. And if we don't, God help us... but I still WON'T vote for him. I'll vote for whichever acceptable, conservative 3rd party candidate is running (so my protest vote will have the most impact), or I'll write one in.

As JimRob says. Romneycare = Obamacare = Commiecare. NO ROMNEY, NO WAY!!
87 posted on 03/04/2012 10:45:00 AM PST by VictoryGal (Never give up, never surrender! REMEMBER NEDA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: trappedincanuckistan; napscoordinator

Election 2012: GOP Super Tuesday.... Real Clear Politics

Ohio is a toss up [within the MOE] according to the polls listed in the above link of Super Tuesday primaries. Santorum looks strong in OK and has stumbled a little in TN. Gringrich appears on track to win GA. Romney appears to win MA, VT, VA. There are three caucuses not listed, AK, ID, ND.

Who knows how all this will shake out but by Tuesday night we may have a better understanding of where it may be headed.

88 posted on 03/04/2012 10:58:14 AM PST by deport (..............God Bless Texas............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist

look at the delegates.

Wash state and Michigan were really ties


89 posted on 03/04/2012 11:05:04 AM PST by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: deport

Shake out, the facts are newt has no way to win, rick still does, so it is now willard or rick, time to decide.


90 posted on 03/04/2012 11:07:46 AM PST by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist
I have it at personal information as an answer to my prayers that you are full of shiite.

Who to believe, who to believe.

If the Lord takes it as a personal insult that Mr. Santorum might lose, this whole country, or at least those who consistently vote liberal, would have been smited long ago.

That the Lord and Creator of all that was, is or ever will be has a stake in the political winners and losers of this nation makes as much sense as praying that a particular side wins a football game.

Either that, or He does have a sense of humor, in allowing the likes of Schumer, Boxer, Murrey and the like having a say so.

91 posted on 03/04/2012 11:25:24 AM PST by going hot (Happiness is a momma deuce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat; All
Shake out, the facts are newt has no way to win, rick still does, so it is now willard or rick, time to decide.

B I N G O !!!

92 posted on 03/04/2012 12:05:53 PM PST by CainConservative (Santorum/Huck 2012 w/ Newt, Cain, Palin, Bach, Parker, Watts, Duncan, & Petraeus in the Cabinet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson; All
I have no real problems with Santorum

T H A N K Y O U , JIM : )

93 posted on 03/04/2012 12:09:07 PM PST by CainConservative (Santorum/Huck 2012 w/ Newt, Cain, Palin, Bach, Parker, Watts, Duncan, & Petraeus in the Cabinet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

If I lived in Cantor’s district, I would base all of my future votes against him on his endorsement of the Massachusetts nightmare. I would not vote for Romney if he gave me half his income.


94 posted on 03/04/2012 12:32:43 PM PST by BlackElk ( Dean of Discipline ,Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Society. Burn 'em Bright!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969

Personally, I don’t care if Ronald Reagan rises from the grave to endorse Romney, I still will NOT vote for Romney. If Rubio accepted being the candidate for VP under Romney, then I won’t ever vote for him either much less on such a ticket. I look forward to Cantor being driven from public life and now Coburn as well. If Sarah Palin endorses Mittens, likewise. Romney is nothing but a useful litmus test. This is not strategic. This is civil war.


95 posted on 03/04/2012 12:56:34 PM PST by BlackElk ( Dean of Discipline ,Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Society. Burn 'em Bright!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: mnehring; All

When I was watching Cantor, before Cantor actually announced, I told my husband it would be Romney. Cantor is not the worst, but he is not really that conservative. Just ask Mark Levin.


96 posted on 03/04/2012 2:40:21 PM PST by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Mr. 10 favorability Cantor endorses Willard the Liberal.
The RINO comes out of the closet.


97 posted on 03/04/2012 3:01:00 PM PST by NKP_Vet (creep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

All the Beltway boys support who they think the nominee will be. Now if Newt or Santorum come back to win the nomination, Cantor and the other RINOs that mascarade as conservatives will jump on their bandwagon.


98 posted on 03/04/2012 3:04:19 PM PST by NKP_Vet (creep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS

This was disgusting news. I’m ready to throw ‘em ALL out and start over!


99 posted on 03/04/2012 5:35:08 PM PST by luvie (This space reserved for heroes............my AF son....our troops....the vets from all wars...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter

I’ve asked this before and I’ll ask it again... Where is the evidence that Obama is some incredibly gifted debater? I couldn’t have been more underwhelmed with his debate performances against John McCain.


100 posted on 03/04/2012 5:37:54 PM PST by DestroyLiberalism
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson