Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CROUSE: Normalizing Penn State pedophilia
The Washington Times ^ | November 17, 2011 | Janice Shaw Crouse

Posted on 11/20/2011 7:13:19 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
To: sten

Penn State openly embraces homosexuals which means they are moral relativists. If you believe and practice moral relativism, there is no right and wrong—no Objective Truth—and everyone decides for themselves what is right and wrong.

Kick God’s Standard out—that homosexual acts are evil—and then you kick out the Standards which gave the US our Natural Rights (God) and you base “logic” and “reason” on urges and “feelings” and not Natural Law Theory (Right Reason according to Nature).

Kick out Natural Law theory (basis of our legal system) and nothing is wrong.....even baby rape. Pederasty always went hand in hand with homosexuality because it is learned by abusing young boys either emotionally or/and physically. It has always been connected—in Ancient Greece—within the Samurai—in Afghanistan....where ever there is an inability to connect with the opposite sex, you have a homosexual culture and boys are used for recreation and “fun” and “lust”.

So APA sets the “Rules” that we follow and determines the “laws” on the book. The APA has been trying to shape “attitudes” about Right and Wrong for 50 years and they are trying for 10 years to removed pederasty as “evil”. Then you will end up having pederasty being a sexual orientation equivalent to “homosexual rights”. It is what NAMBLA and the Founder of the Homosexual movement want—free access to boys and sodomy elevated to a “right”.

It is totally a bogus “right” and sodomy needs to be strongly condemned and outlawed in our country again because of all the damage it does.


21 posted on 11/20/2011 8:17:36 PM PST by savagesusie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sten

Yeah, the second cousin was a 12 year old boy. Who has been in a mental hospital for quite a while.


22 posted on 11/20/2011 8:30:58 PM PST by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Eska

By far, not all people sexually abused as children grow up to be abusers of children.


23 posted on 11/20/2011 8:48:18 PM PST by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
At the same time, a small, radical organization, B4U-ACT, is lobbying under the radar to convince the American Psychiatric Association (APA) - publisher of the bible for identifying abnormal behaviors, the Diagnostic&StatisticalManualofMental Disorders (DSM) -to declare that pedophilia should not be included in the list of abnormal behaviors.

This is precisely how it started with just plain old homosexuality. In the DSM of the mid-70's (i don't recall the exact years) homosex was abnormal. In the next edition four years later "ego-distonic" homosexuality was a disorder - it was only wrong if it bothered you. Four years later, it wasn't in the DSM at all - homosex had become normal.

I really despise the world these assclowns are creating...

24 posted on 11/20/2011 8:49:16 PM PST by ProfoundMan (Time to finish the Reagan Revolution! - RightyPics.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks; MrEdd; 185JHP; 230FMJ; AFA-Michigan; AKA Elena; Abathar; ...
Homosexual Agenda and Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda or moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

This is really an amazing article. There have been a few articles pinged out recently about the push to normalize pedophilia, but this Washington Times article really details it in a way that can only inspire horror and nausea in any sane person. I urge everyone to read the entire article. And what we see in other news shows the truth of what is happening - little girls sexualized wearing grown women's lingerie, the entire situation at Pedo State, the dead silence about the rampant pedearsty among homosexuals, etc. One quote from the article, but please click the link and read the whole thing:

But now, radical fringe groups with a bully pulpit are arguing that people with “atypical, culturally forbidden or religiously proscribed sexual interests” should not be labeled ill, and they are putting tremendous pressure on the APA to comply.

25 posted on 11/20/2011 8:50:01 PM PST by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: savagesusie

It is true that the Bible warns man aways from homosexuality. In physical, mental and social terms, the negative consequences are clear.


26 posted on 11/20/2011 8:51:13 PM PST by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

“They should lock these over-educated mental midget mensa’s up.”

Being a researcher from Harvard University, Johns Hopkins University and the universities of Louisville and Illinois does not make one a ‘mensa’ midget or giant. In this case it simply establishes them as EVIL sexual preditors.

They should be locked up...give them an ‘opportunity’ to be the ‘girl friend’ of the bad boys in any State Prison system...see how fast they change their mind...especially if they get aids from their ‘fun and games’.


27 posted on 11/20/2011 8:55:18 PM PST by GGpaX4DumpedTea (I am a tea party descendant - steeped in the Constitutional legacy handed down by the Founders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sten

“what does the APA push have to do with Penn state again?”

Read the article...


28 posted on 11/20/2011 8:56:50 PM PST by GGpaX4DumpedTea (I am a tea party descendant - steeped in the Constitutional legacy handed down by the Founders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Eska

The reality of the new morality.


29 posted on 11/20/2011 8:56:59 PM PST by RobbyS (Viva Christus Rex.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SaraJohnson
Maybe not, but there were 4-5 older men in that village that sure did and they were doing their best to see it continue into future generations.

I have a hunting buddy that was abused by a priest as a youngster, you don't make that sorta thing up. He told me he would never do anything against the church over it. He also said he put it behind him and didn't let it affect him, guy is 71 this year.

It sure is prevalent throughout many Indian Villages up here in Alaska, and in others nonexistent. It's almost as if the village leadership decides to take a stand even if it means their relatives going off to jail and then in other villages, nobody talks about it.

30 posted on 11/20/2011 8:57:10 PM PST by Eska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: savagesusie
It is totally a bogus “right” and sodomy needs to be strongly condemned and outlawed in our country again because of all the damage it does.

WELL SAID!

31 posted on 11/20/2011 8:58:53 PM PST by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ProfoundMan

Wait a sec.. let me play devil’s advocate here...

Don’t most conservatives consider homosexuality to be a “lifestyle choice” anyway? So how can a “lifestyle choice” be a mental disease? Unless you are now claiming they are born with it? You can’t have it both ways.

People don’t choose to be bipolar. People don’t choose to be depressed or have a panic disorder or have schizophrenia. Those are mental diseases. If you are claiming that homosexuality is a mental disease, then you are also blow the claim that they are choosing to be gay.


32 posted on 11/20/2011 9:12:07 PM PST by floridarunner01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

The child clothing industry seems to be run by pedophiles these days.


33 posted on 11/20/2011 9:16:16 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Occupy DC General Assembly: We are Marxist tools. WE ARE MARXIST TOOLS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Have you seen any of those articles on FR (I’ve pinged a couple out) showing little girls with sultry makeup, pouty lips, revealing lingerie, and lounging in seductive poses? Blood curdling. Someone on one thread who seemed to know about such things stated that many of the people involved in the childrens’ pageants and fashion businesses are pedophiles.


34 posted on 11/20/2011 9:24:38 PM PST by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

No it’s funded by parents who buy those clothes and let their kids wear them.

You think 13 year old girls are working and paying for that stuff with their own money? Nope. Mommy is buying it.


35 posted on 11/20/2011 9:25:51 PM PST by floridarunner01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: floridarunner01

Most conservatives who know anything about homosexuality know that most homosexuals do not consciously choose to be attracted to the same sex. Altough there is a subset of homosexuals who do indeed make the claim that they have indeed chosen to be homosexuals.

They do, however, choose to act on their sick and immoral destires, and they can choose to restrain themselves, and to seek help. Many have changed and are now “former homosexuals”.

Everyone has illicit or sick or immoral desires that they do not act on. That’s called being a sane and moral human being. People who use no self control over their desires are in that sense mentally ill and immoral. The two are not mutually exclusive.


36 posted on 11/20/2011 9:26:24 PM PST by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: floridarunner01

Takes two to tango. One, those who make and market slutwear for little girls, and two, the fools and worse who buy it for their children. They’re both responsible for it.


37 posted on 11/20/2011 9:28:14 PM PST by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd

One can err about this complex matter by being flippant, or by being pompously pontificatory. The high emotional feeling inspired by the topic makes calm reasoning difficult.


38 posted on 11/20/2011 9:31:08 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (bloodwashed not whitewashed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck; MrEdd

I disagree. I don’t think calm reasoning is difficult at all.


39 posted on 11/20/2011 9:40:23 PM PST by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: floridarunner01

“You think 13 year old girls are working and paying for that stuff with their own money? Nope. Mommy is buying it.”

I always suspected that it was alimony and/or child support money being spent on that stuff; there is no way some little girl dressed as a whore lives with her natural father in the house.


40 posted on 11/20/2011 10:14:55 PM PST by kearnyirish2 (r)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson