Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Live Thread: The Thanksgiving Family Forum non-debate
Hotair ^ | 11-19-11 | Jazz Shaw

Posted on 11/19/2011 1:31:28 PM PST by Mozilla

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-227 next last
To: Mozilla

Thank you! So far this is great, and I sure did not want to visit HotAir in light of their treatment of Herman.

May God guide our course.
Tatt


41 posted on 11/19/2011 2:37:56 PM PST by thesearethetimes... ("Courage, is fear that has said its prayers." DorothyBernard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno

Yes its great...

What a person bedlieves determines who they are...

another reason Romney and Huntsmasn may not be there...

Bachmann

Mormons dont think women should teach about God...theyre not “{worthy” too..

Men and women are segregated in the Mormon equivalant of “Sunday School”

GO Michele !!!


42 posted on 11/19/2011 2:38:03 PM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Brandonmark

When Johnson was the Gov of TX

or she meant the 60s when he was POTUS


43 posted on 11/19/2011 2:40:00 PM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

Excellent so far


44 posted on 11/19/2011 2:42:05 PM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brandonmark
Never mind...I found it:

"In 1954, the U.S. Congress amended (without debate or analysis) Internal Revenue Code §501(c)(3) to restrict the speech of non-profit tax exempt entities, including churches. Before the amendment was passed, there were no restrictions on what churches could or couldn’t do with regard to speech about government and voting, excepting only a 1934 law preventing non-profits from using a substantial part of their resources to lobby for legislation.

The 1954 amendment, offered by then-Senator Lyndon Johnson, stated that non-profit tax-exempt entities could not “participate in, or intervene in (including the publishing or distributing of statements), any political campaign on behalf of or in opposition to any candidate for public office.” Since the amendment passed, the IRS has steadfastly maintained that any speech by churches about candidates for government office, including sermons from the pulpit, can result in loss of tax exemption."

---source: Alliance Defense Fund

45 posted on 11/19/2011 2:42:14 PM PST by Brandonmark (2012: Our Hope IS Change!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

See my post 44


46 posted on 11/19/2011 2:43:38 PM PST by Brandonmark (2012: Our Hope IS Change!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Brandonmark

oops #45


47 posted on 11/19/2011 2:45:07 PM PST by Brandonmark (2012: Our Hope IS Change!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

I agree, it’s been excellent. We will see into the souls of these people tonight. What a shame it’s not televised.


48 posted on 11/19/2011 2:46:26 PM PST by CynicalBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla; All

Thanks again :) I just sent the link to my email list! This needs to be seen and heard!

May God guide our course.
Tatt


49 posted on 11/19/2011 2:47:08 PM PST by thesearethetimes... ("Courage, is fear that has said its prayers." DorothyBernard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear

That was a whopper of a question for Cain, even if he didn’t specifically mention the three-fifths compromise.


50 posted on 11/19/2011 2:48:17 PM PST by OnlyTurkeysHaveLeftWings
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Gator113

Maybe Kristol would be OK with both Romney & Gingrich, but I take this article to mean that he isn’t too enthusiastic about Romney, and likes Newt:

http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/evitable_609224.html


51 posted on 11/19/2011 2:49:04 PM PST by BCrago66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

Rick Perry really takes the gibes with good humor. Takes it like a man. Gotta admire that. Sounds comfortable and reasonable too. I like this forum. They should do one every week for about three hours.


52 posted on 11/19/2011 2:50:22 PM PST by jessduntno ("They say the world has become too complex for simple answers... they are wrong." - RR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno

Yeah, he did take it with good humor. That should work out well for him in Iowa.


53 posted on 11/19/2011 2:52:42 PM PST by writer33 (Mark Levin Is The Constitutional Engine Of Conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: writer33

Cain thinks that Congress should have “the inertia.” But I think Congress already has that.


54 posted on 11/19/2011 2:57:20 PM PST by BCrago66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: thesearethetimes...

This should have been on c-span. Shame on them.


55 posted on 11/19/2011 2:58:49 PM PST by Mozilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

It’s possible C-Span wasn’t asked, and those running the debate wanted the hits.


56 posted on 11/19/2011 3:01:47 PM PST by BCrago66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: BCrago66

And to follow that up, you need to have the right people in Congress that will do something with that inertia. And that means no Boehner.


57 posted on 11/19/2011 3:02:01 PM PST by writer33 (Mark Levin Is The Constitutional Engine Of Conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: BCrago66
It’s possible C-Span wasn’t asked, and those running the debate wanted the hits.

That's what I'm thinking - this group hosting this debate seems to want to keep everything focused on them and their website. Which is fine, I don't think some of the debates hosted by the major networks are on C-Span.
58 posted on 11/19/2011 3:03:27 PM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: BCrago66

>> It’s possible C-Span wasn’t asked, and those running the debate wanted the hits.CSPAN was going to air it until this past Thursday when they came up with the excuse they didn’t have adequate funds. LOL Can you imagine, not covering a Republican forum because of lack of funds! Surely not because it’s the Republicans want to de-fund public broadcasting could it?


59 posted on 11/19/2011 3:05:31 PM PST by CynicalBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: BCrago66

Thank you,66.


60 posted on 11/19/2011 3:06:32 PM PST by Paperdoll (On the cutting edge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-227 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson