Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mississippi amendment on 'personhood' divides Christians
CNN.com ^ | 11/2/2011 | Rich Phillips

Posted on 11/08/2011 9:26:42 AM PST by surroundedbyblue

In the Carpenter home, every meal begins with a prayer. Robin and his wife, Emily, are devout Christians. But they part ways with many other Christians over a measure that would expand the legal definition of human life.

Their son, Luke, now 4 years old, was born through in vitro fertilization.

The anti-abortion amendment being voted on this week in the state could restrict in vitro procedures, and the Carpenters are worried that if they wait too long to add to their family, they may end up breaking the law.

"I don't really want or need anybody else getting involved in trying to limit how that works for us, or stopping it," said Robin Carpenter. "We need to have the same rights to have a family as anybody else does."

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: Mississippi
KEYWORDS: cnn; conception; ivf; moralabsolutes; moralrelativism; naturalconception; naturalfamily; prolife
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
'Diane Derzis, who runs Mississippi's only abortion clinic, said most people don't understand how far-reaching the amendment could be. "By this very definition of this bill, a fertilized egg is a person, so that does away with the IUD and most forms of birth control," she said. "For a woman who has a miscarriage -- is she going to be investigated? I mean, this may sound like the Twilight Zone, but this is where we are with this stuff." '

Yeah, lady, you'd know about Twlight Zone. After all, you earn a living by killing babies.

Nice hit piece by CNN. They take the moral relativists & paint them as victims. They're only victims of their own skewed logic.

1 posted on 11/08/2011 9:26:43 AM PST by surroundedbyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

of interest.....


2 posted on 11/08/2011 9:28:15 AM PST by surroundedbyblue (Live the message of Fatima - pray & do penance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: surroundedbyblue

“In the Carpenter home, every meal begins with a prayer. Robin and his wife, Emily, are devout Christians. But they part ways with many other Christians over a measure that would expand the legal definition of human life.

Their son, Luke, now 4 years old, was born through in vitro fertilization.”

If they’re “devout” Christians, why did that go the IVF route? Perhaps this is the fault of their pastor.

“We need to have the same rights to have a family as anybody else does.”

Where in either the Bible or the Constitution is this “right to have a family”?


3 posted on 11/08/2011 9:31:44 AM PST by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: surroundedbyblue

Mississippi Initiative #26 - Personhood Amendment
Actual Wording:

Section 33. Person Defined. As used in this Article III of the state constitution, “The term ‘person’ or ‘persons’ shall include every human being from the moment of fertilization, cloning, or the functional equivalent thereof.”

This initiative shall not require any additional revenue for implementation.

I don’t see what the hubbub is.


4 posted on 11/08/2011 9:34:53 AM PST by Sybeck1 (Mitt Romney, a piss poor choice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

Well, you might try Genesis, where God told Adam and Eve to “be fruitful and multiply...”

Of course, that only applies to people who look like me and share my moral/religious philosophy.


5 posted on 11/08/2011 9:36:46 AM PST by ixtl ( You live and learn. Or you don't live long.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: surroundedbyblue
Time for the rosary beads again. ;-)
6 posted on 11/08/2011 9:39:57 AM PST by verity (The Obama Administration is a Criminal Enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: verity

Always :-)


7 posted on 11/08/2011 9:40:37 AM PST by surroundedbyblue (Live the message of Fatima - pray & do penance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ixtl

That was a command. Not a “right”. After all, the apostle Paul and Jesus himself did not marry and have children. Were their “rights” violated?

He also did not authorize the use of ivf but the natural method of reproduction to Adam and Eve.


8 posted on 11/08/2011 9:42:16 AM PST by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: surroundedbyblue
Yeah, lady, you'd know about Twlight Zone. After all, you earn a living by killing babies.

Just doing the jobs that Americans won't do!

9 posted on 11/08/2011 9:46:31 AM PST by Alex Murphy (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2703506/posts?page=518#518)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

Nor did He authorize automobiles, airplanes, computers, organ transplants, and a lot of other stuff we use. Does that mean we should just wear animal skins and be hunter gatherers??

I personally do not believe God gave us these awesome brains and then told us not to use them.

You have a right to your opinion, just don’t try to deny me mine.


10 posted on 11/08/2011 9:49:12 AM PST by ixtl ( You live and learn. Or you don't live long.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ixtl

I just got off the thread about the Duggars expecting their 20th child. I think they are living the words of the Bible.


11 posted on 11/08/2011 9:52:06 AM PST by murron (Proud Mom of a Marine Vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: surroundedbyblue

I know a lot of Pro-ife groups are now saying that life begins at fertilization instead of conception, which is totally wrong. For those of us who are Catholic, Mary was the Immaculate Conception, meaning she was conceived without original sin on her soul. It’s not called the Immaculate Fertilization. This means that our souls enter our bodies at conception.


12 posted on 11/08/2011 9:55:31 AM PST by murron (Proud Mom of a Marine Vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: surroundedbyblue
Mississippi amendment on 'personhood' divides Christians

Kind of a 'wheat from the chaff' thing.

13 posted on 11/08/2011 9:56:57 AM PST by tbpiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: surroundedbyblue

My — My all this speculation —what if? — Why not let the amendment -the terms used — speak for itself? Cut the speculation and fear mongering. and as to this lady who is pious— if the poor woman is so worried that maybe they had waited too long and might find this Amendment in their way to having children... I urge her to read what the bible says of
Abraham and Sarah. Oh I forgot they had a turkey baster baby— eh?Genesis chapters 16:-18: ought refresh her memory.


14 posted on 11/08/2011 10:02:00 AM PST by StonyBurk (ring)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: murron

What’s the difference? I was always under the impression that the two are synonymous.

Conception is the moment when an egg is fertilized.


15 posted on 11/08/2011 10:03:38 AM PST by surroundedbyblue (Live the message of Fatima - pray & do penance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

“If they’re “devout” Christians, why did that go the IVF route? Perhaps this is the fault of their pastor.”

Some people take the parts that they like from the Bible and disregard the rest. God have mercy on their souls. Their child was conceived in gross sin in my understanding. They can turn to Jesus and repent and be forgiven. Perhaps they will be blessed with a natural conception afterwards.

All said, they have a child now, I bet before they had that one they would have been grateful for only one. Greedy natures are sinful and do not produce good Spiritual fruit.

So they think the abortion mills should stay open so they can expand their little family. If they read this thread I pray it will open their eyes.

As a personal note, I have no children but God still blesses my life. They are not essential to salvation.


16 posted on 11/08/2011 10:03:51 AM PST by Tomato lover (Jesus is the way, the truth and the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ixtl

“You have a right to your opinion, just don’t try to deny me mine.”

I have no government power. Hence, I couldn’t deny you your right to an opinion even if I wanted to. So please don’t play the “victim”. That’s what leftists/OWS-types do and this is a conservative site. I also believe that ivf goes against God’s principles and adds to the dehumanizing view of people in our world. If a man and a woman can marry and reproduce naturally or adopt, I am all in favor of it. But I do not agree with ivf and that is my freedom to do so.


17 posted on 11/08/2011 10:08:53 AM PST by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DrewsMum; Tupelo; mstar; jdirt; Vietnam Vet From New Mexico; wardaddy; KLT; montesquiue; ...

Mississippi\Baptist Ping


18 posted on 11/08/2011 10:11:38 AM PST by WKB (Anything Obama: "What a revoltin' development this is")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: surroundedbyblue

This bill does bring up difficult questions. Among the most difficult has to do with IVF, during which process many eggs are typically fertilized. The question: What do we do with the “snowflake kids” that result from the process of IVF? Simply disregard them? Or produce only the number of fertilized eggs (i.e., “children”) that mothers want to see come to term? What about adoption of “snowflake kids”?

Whew.

It is good to consider life, and the ramifications for those of us who have emerged alive from the womb.


19 posted on 11/08/2011 10:16:30 AM PST by Theo (May Rome decrease and Christ increase.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: surroundedbyblue

Conception & fertilization used to be synonomous — and in casual usage, still are. However, I think the “legality” or medical term of conception refers to the implantation of the fertilized egg in the uterus.


20 posted on 11/08/2011 10:30:29 AM PST by workerbee (We're not scared, Maobama -- we're pissed off!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson