Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Baby star blasts jets of water into space
PhysOrg.com ^ | June 22, 2011 | By Joel N. Shurkin

Posted on 06/22/2011 11:26:59 AM PDT by Red Badger

Astronomers have found a nascent star 750 light years from earth that shoots colossal jets of water -- a cosmic fire hose -- out its poles in bullet-like pulses.

In a process that almost defies adjectives and analogies, each jet of water is the equivalent of a hundred million times the water flowing through the Amazon River every second and the speed of the jet is the equivalent of 80 times the muzzle velocity of an AK-47 assault rifle.

The blast creates huge shockwaves around the star and the process may be responsible for sprinkling the universe with water.

And it could go on for a thousand years in each star. Astronomers think all baby stars go through this process as they form, and that our sun did it too once.

The protostar was found in the Perseus constellation in an object called L1448-MM, seen from the earth to the right of the Pleiades, also called the Seven Sisters cluster of stars, in the constellation of Taurus. It is called a low-mass protostar, meaning it is just beginning to grow into a star.

While jets like that have been seen in other baby stars, astronomers, using the European Space Agency’'s Herschel infrared orbiting telescope were able to measure the flow of the jets using water molecules as the tracer.

Lars E. Kristensen, a postdoctoral student at the Leiden University in the Netherlands, an author of the paper, said that all stars are formed by the accretion of dust and other particles in interstellar space and are eventually surrounded by a disk of material that falls into the star as it builds.

The disks are something like the rings of Saturn but far less well-defined, he said, "more puffy."

Material that is not used by the forming star is blasted back out into space from the poles, perpendicular to the angle of the disks.

"We don’'t know the launching point or the exact launching mechanism," Kristensen said. "There is no self-consistent theory that can explain what we are seeing."

The stream of gasses is about 180,000 degrees Fahrenheit, so the water is not liquid, but rather atoms of hydrogen and oxygen atoms, the building block of water. When it gets into space and the molecules interact with the dust surrounding the star, however, and the atoms probably combine to form water ice.

Kristensen and the European astronomers described the jets of being made up of "bullets" of water but that is a bit misleading. The water actually pulses, like a fire hose with an unsteady water supply.

Kristensen says the pulses fly out at 50 kilometers a second, or about 120,000 mph. As a pulse starts to slow, it is rammed from behind by pulses moving faster behind it, producing something like a bow shock wave. Those collisions are what the telescope sees and what he described as bullets.

Each pulse could last a year, which for an astronomer is shorter than a blink. The bullets are going so fast they eventually fly beyond the accretion disk and the gas cloud around the protostar. The shock waves eventually dissipate.

Besides the hydrogen and oxygen atoms, the jet streams are known to include carbon dioxide and silicon oxide molecules. The Herschel is capable of spotting the light signatures of the atoms through the gas cloud that surrounds L1448-MM.

No one knows how long this process lasts. Eventually, the star reaches maturity and has acquired all the material it needs and the whole process of making a star shuts down, which could be anywhere from one to ten million years.

"We've known about these jets before," said astronomer Mark Krumholz of the University of California at Santa Cruz, who was not part of the research team, but the measurement "is far more precise." Krumholz agrees that all stars go through this birth process and said that the use of water as a tracer gives astronomers a handy tool to measure these jets.

Provided by Inside Science News Service


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; Technical
KEYWORDS: catastrophism; cosmos; seaofstars; space; star; universe; velikovsky
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: dila813

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oort_cloud


41 posted on 06/22/2011 12:32:23 PM PDT by Red Badger (Nothing is a 'right' if someone has to give it to you................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
...each jet of water is the equivalent of a hundred million times the water flowing through the Amazon River every second and the speed of the jet is the equivalent of 80 times the muzzle velocity of an AK-47 assault rifle.

I wonder how much energy it takes, expressed in jelly doughnuts, to push the water like that.

42 posted on 06/22/2011 12:33:33 PM PDT by Vroomfondel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scythian

[ they don’t have a clue about things 750 million light years away, not a clue. ]

Nice yarn tho...
These people love yarns... like marxism.. or even democracy..


43 posted on 06/22/2011 12:37:02 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

http://www.universetoday.com/23870/the-milky-ways-rotation/


44 posted on 06/22/2011 12:40:01 PM PDT by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Vroomfondel
I wonder how much energy it takes, expressed in jelly doughnuts, to push the water like that.

I'm not sure, but if you could release the energy bound up in the jelly donut's mass in it's entirety, I'd guess around 522.
45 posted on 06/22/2011 12:48:37 PM PDT by ZX12R
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
So it’s attracted to osmium?

Me thinks I don't know what osmium is.
46 posted on 06/22/2011 12:49:51 PM PDT by ZX12R
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: ZX12R

The densest known element.


47 posted on 06/22/2011 12:51:13 PM PDT by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/15/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
The densest known element.

Thanks for teaching me something today. I didn't know that.
48 posted on 06/22/2011 12:54:56 PM PDT by ZX12R
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
The densest known element.

I thought that was Keith-Olbermmanium.

49 posted on 06/22/2011 12:57:14 PM PDT by dragonblustar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Baby star blasts jets of water into space

Wow, this kid can do anything!

50 posted on 06/22/2011 12:57:39 PM PDT by Maceman (Obama: As American as nasei goreng)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scythian
they don’t have a clue about things 750 million light years away, not a clue.

Don't worry, you're only 6 orders of magnitude off the actual distance. Or is it 7? Not sure.
51 posted on 06/22/2011 12:58:43 PM PDT by TexasAg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: dragonblustar
Keith-Olbermmanium

He is the densest known enema not element.

52 posted on 06/22/2011 1:00:10 PM PDT by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/15/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: onedoug
The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork. --Psalm 19:1

Hayden did an outstanding job putting that verse to music in his "Creation" oratorio.

53 posted on 06/22/2011 1:35:35 PM PDT by Calusa (The pump don't work cause the vandals took the handles. Quoth Bob Dylan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ZX12R
Me thinks I don't know what osmium is.

You must not be old enough to remember Donny & Marie Osmium....and the Osmium Family..................

54 posted on 06/22/2011 1:49:00 PM PDT by Red Badger (Nothing is a 'right' if someone has to give it to you................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye; ZX12R
So it’s attracted to osmium?

I was attracted to Marie Osmium...........

55 posted on 06/22/2011 1:51:15 PM PDT by Red Badger (Nothing is a 'right' if someone has to give it to you................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
I was attracted to Marie Osmium...........

Even today, she is seriously HOT! I stare at her commercials with promiscuous thought. Was she country or rock and roll? I forget in my old age.
56 posted on 06/22/2011 2:29:24 PM PDT by ZX12R
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Bockscar; 75thOVI; agrace; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aragorn; aristotleman; ...

Thanks Bockscar, definitely, very interesting!


57 posted on 06/22/2011 4:45:12 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Thanks Cincinna for this link -- http://www.friendsofitamar.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Where’s the AK-47 tag? Gratuitous quote here.


58 posted on 06/22/2011 4:50:23 PM PDT by BenKenobi (Honkeys for Herman!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
In a process that almost defies adjectives and analogies, each jet of water is the equivalent of a hundred million times the water flowing through the Amazon River every second and the speed of the jet is the equivalent of 80 times the muzzle velocity of an AK-47 assault rifle.

The blast creates huge shockwaves around the star and the process may be responsible for sprinkling the universe with water.

And it could go on for a thousand years in each star.

Let's run the math on this one.

Flow of water through the Amazon = 219,000 m3 / second.

Source.

219,000 m3/sec * (100 cm / 1 m)3 =

219,000,000,000 cubic centimeters/sec

=219,000,000,000 ml /second * 1g/ml = 219,000,000,000 g /second

For 1000 years is

1000 year *(365 days /year) * (24 hr / day) * (3600 s /hr)

=31,536,000,000 seconds.

Multiply the two together 2.19 x 1011 * (3.15 x 1010) =~ 6.9 x 1021 grams.

Convert to tons: 1 gram * (1 lb/454 g) * (1 ton / 2000 lb). 6.9 x 1020 / 9.08 x 105 --> 7.6 x 1015 tons of water.

7,600,000,000,000,000 = 7.6 quadrillion tons.

By comparison Lake Superior is 12,100 km3

1 km3 * (1000 m /1 km)3 * (100 cm / 1 m)3* (1 ml / 1 cm3) * (1g /ml) * (1 lb/454 g) * (1 ton / 2000 lb) =

13,325,991,189,427

So I guess 500 x the water in Lake Superior?

Bueller?

Done while planning the grocery list in another window, blame the coupon site for any distraction-caused errors.

Cheers!

59 posted on 06/22/2011 6:00:40 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimRed
"Probably. That means that it's only a theory."

Everything is "only a theory".

60 posted on 06/22/2011 6:06:02 PM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson