Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Monica Crowley on Fox Business Follow the Money: Mention of "Natural Born"
Follow the Money on Fox Business | 4/27/2011 | Monica Crowley

Posted on 04/27/2011 8:37:35 PM PDT by PieterCasparzen

I can't find a link to the video yet, but I just saw Monica Crowley on Eric Bollings "Follow the Money" show on Fox Business, as part of a panel. Aired between 10pm and 11pm on East Coast.

She actually brought up the "natural born" issue !!!!! I was flabbergasted ! It has actually been mentioned on TV.

Hats off to Monica Crowley !


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: certifigate; crowley; foxbusiness; monicacrowley; naturalborncitizen; obama
Sorry I couldn't find the clip...

Can anyone find it ?

1 posted on 04/27/2011 8:37:38 PM PDT by PieterCasparzen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen

What did she say about it specifically?


2 posted on 04/27/2011 8:39:44 PM PDT by ConjunctionJunction
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen

I adore Monuca Crowley. I watch her every week on the McLaughlin Group on PBS.


3 posted on 04/27/2011 8:52:28 PM PDT by MissMack99 (BO Stinks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConjunctionJunction

She said (in only a minute or two) that the Constitution states that the President must be “natural born”, that the specific issue has never been litigated and that there is debate as to what “natural born” means, some saying that born within the U.S. is enough, others saying that both parents must be citizens. (I’m paraphrasing probably quite inaccurately, but that was the general gist).


4 posted on 04/27/2011 9:19:09 PM PDT by PieterCasparzen (Huguenot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen

Remember the good old days when it was mandatory to post pictures of the more attractive females... and within the first 10 posts?


5 posted on 04/27/2011 9:33:55 PM PDT by April Lexington (Study the Constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: April Lexington

6 posted on 04/27/2011 10:08:39 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (A thorough knowledge of the Bible is worth more than a college education. TR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen

MuBarak is an idiot to have released this “Copy of Date Points” on a Wednesday!

What moron doesn’t know that if you want a story to die you release it over the weekend or on a holiday?

Further, it may have been enough to convince Lieutenant Lakin to continue following orders of deployment as he had done so many times, honorably, as a decorated veteran would do and does.

But no... He let an honorable man hang in the wind, under a cloud of doubt and ruin his career and life. For What?

This settles nothing and I want to see the one he found among his mother’s belongings when she passed in 1995, as well the one that is sealed in his admissions for kindergarten and preschool.

Barak, if this settles it for you then you screwed a fine man and you should be ashamed!

You have no honor.


7 posted on 04/28/2011 1:52:48 AM PDT by Vendome ("Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it anyway")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen
This whole BC thing is a put up.  A Fairy Tail!
 
It's a slight of hand and there is no reason to have not put an original copy of his Long Form Birth Certificate out there in the 1st place.
 
But, think of it.  There are three that are known to exist or have existed and has at least two in his possessoin:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Let them claim there is no long form.
 
1st.  They and everyone has said all along the COLB is an abstract.  A COLB is a walkup document, meaning you can walk up to the desk, ask for your BC and they will provide an abstract, called a COLB in about 10 minutes.  That means there is a long form and Hawaii statutes, starting at (318)
 
2nd.  Hawaii already said they have seen Barry O.'s vital records and issued two statements - blah, blah, blah, right?
 
3rd.  Barry O. never had to show his long form BC ever, in his life, for anything?  Like obtaining a passport.  That one document is better than a drivers license.  It saying to the world you are who is contained in the passport document, which is based on an investigation of your background and YOU MUST provide a Birth Certificate as foundational proof of who YOU say you are.  From there the State Department does their background check on you and if you are who you say you are with no ammendments, modifications or whatever to your identity they issue it clean. 
 
Most adults can go to a desk or filing cabinet in his house and produce a birth certificate in a few minutes?
 

Barry O. tried to pass of something that was inconsistent with what the rest of have and know to be a “Birth Certificate”.

The so called COLB has many flaws with it:

  • His father’s race could never have been listed as “African”.  That was not the nomenclature at all, in the 1960’s.  So that begins the suspicion of a fraudulent document.
  •  The COLB is also cropped in many of the pictures that claim it is a scan.  If it is a scan, why not leave the document and size intact?
  • The COLB also has no artifacts such paper folds.  A scan does not make those disappear and in fact will highlight them.
  • The COLB that is scanned mysteriously does not show the Seal of Hawaii.  Why?  Because it was computer generated and not scanned.  Guess they forgot to add that back in.
  • More over, many of us are concerned and want to know why he wasted time producing a document that is inconsistent with what we know a Birth Certificate looks like.

 The best part and even more confusing is why he didn't release any of the three Birth Certificates we know already existed before 2007.

  • His kindergarten records and the BC, that should be there, have mysteriously disappeared.
  • The BC he used to get into college, apply for loans and most definitely used for his passport. That wasn't available?
  • Why couldn't he just present the one he found among his mother's belongings upon her death.   He waxed on and wondered about it and his father in one of his books.  Why not post that one?

Those were most certainly BC’s and not a COLB. There is no reason to create confusion but, for the fact he is hiding something. That something will be discovered, though and this is a long process.

“I discovered this article, folded away among my birth certificate and old vaccination forms, when I was in high school. It’s a short piece, with a photograph of him. No mention is made of my mother or me, and I’m left to wonder whether the omission was intentional on my father’s part, in anticipation of his long departure. Perhaps the reporter failed to ask personal questions, intimidated by my father’s imperious manner; or perhaps it was an editorial decision, not part of the simple story that they were looking for. I wonder, too, whether the omission caused a fight between my parents.”

From “Dreams From My Father” (Pg. 26 last paragraph)

So with all these Birth Certificates lying around, why did he feel it necessary to produce a "Certification of Live Birth" that is inconsistent with a Birth Certificate and wholly lacking all of the information you would find, in you know, a Birth Certificate?

He seemed to have some emotional attachment to the Birth Certificate found among his mother’s belongings.  Why wouldn’t he just slap that one up, for all the world to see?

It seemed important that he found a document that is called a “Birth Certificate” and it is highly unlikely he would not know what one looks like.

Hope no one brings up some house fire that vaporized his BC.  That was in 1972 and none of the documents listed here would have been affected by that “fishy” event.

 
The point of the birth certificate is to uncover this man's past for it's factual existence and not the narrative we have been told.
 
We want to know if he ever traveled, went to school in America, obtained loans, etc in another name or as a foreign student or as a foreigner!!!!
 
That is what we are after at a minimum.
 
Finally, there can be no doubt Barak was in fact born with a divided citizenship.  He proudly admits as much.
 
That means if we were conscripted by draft into the United States Military during a conflict, when he was 18, he could have avoided the draft by simply returning to another country of his citizenship.  We know and he admits he was a citizen of Kenya at the age of 18 so he could have returned with no penalty, to Kenya and not even I would call him a draft dodger if had under those circumstances.
 
You are wholly one thing or another but not two distinctly different and separate things that conflict with each other's existence.
 
He was born with a divided allegiance and is "Not a Natural Born Citizen".  Might be a citizen but, he ain't a Natural Born Citizen.

8 posted on 04/28/2011 1:53:06 AM PDT by Vendome ("Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it anyway")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen

Thanks!


9 posted on 04/28/2011 5:01:09 AM PDT by ConjunctionJunction
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ConjunctionJunction

Is it natural for a foreign citizen to be the parent of a child who is only entitled to American citizenship and no other? Or is it natural for that child to be a natural born dual citizen? While the child of two American citizens can only naturallly be a singular or natural born American? I think it all comes down to what is natural? What is the natural course of birthright citizenship? Is citizenship naturally passed from parent to child? Or does the State have the right to claim sovereignty over a child born within its borders and bestow citizenship upon that child which would supercede the right of the parent to bestow their own citizenship upon their offspring? It has always seemed imperialistic to me that a child born away from a parent(s)’ homeland is considered to be a citizen of where the child is born and not a citizen of the parent(s)’ homeland. Though more recently those children are often said to have dual citizenship... there is much to be logically examined in regards to this issue. Though if brought to the limelight the media will play the felling/emotion card of boohoo you hurt someone’s feelings by not allowing them to claim they are a natural born American just because their foreign parents chose to give birht abroad in America.


10 posted on 04/28/2011 5:22:06 AM PDT by This I Wonder32460
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen

Is this it?

Pamela Geller on Fox Business: Obama’s Birth Certifcate
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AArF2jLEIOs


11 posted on 04/29/2011 10:03:08 AM PDT by ConjunctionJunction
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson