Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tea party leader lashes out at Scott Brown (RINO says Tea Party "simply irresponsible")
Politico ^ | 2011-04-01 | Jennifer Epstein

Posted on 04/01/2011 4:59:37 PM PDT by rabscuttle385

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: max americana

I donated to Brown but do not play to again.

He was the deciding vote on the DREAM Act and that alone is worth $35 to me.


21 posted on 04/01/2011 5:29:43 PM PDT by bwc2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: max americana

If you mean the cute broad from SD; I agree.


22 posted on 04/01/2011 5:32:46 PM PDT by who knows what evil? (G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: kanawa

We need to be wiser with our stewardship of political campaign funds...certain states should just be written off as ‘lost causes’. There is no sense wasting money on races in Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island; among others. Divert your financial support to candidates in ‘red’ or ‘purple’ states...conservative candidates who are less likely to stick us in the back. One wonders if the money p*ssed away on Brown could have been used to drag a conservative candidate across the finish line in another state this past November.


23 posted on 04/01/2011 5:38:57 PM PDT by who knows what evil? (G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: steel_resolve

If it makes you hurt less, I gave the asshat a hundred bucks.


24 posted on 04/01/2011 5:40:36 PM PDT by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

the guy poses naked for a magazine. Enough said. something wrong with his head


25 posted on 04/01/2011 5:42:16 PM PDT by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

And now he’s whining that the dems are coming after him.

Oh, poor baby. He can hide behind the other girls in the senate, snowe and collins. The three of them can hold hands all the while.


26 posted on 04/01/2011 5:44:30 PM PDT by Carley (UNION AGITATORS, NO DIFFERENT THAN THE ARAB STREET. UGLY AND VIOLENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traditional1

The “benefit” is having a Majority of 51 + gets you the Senate Leader position. The Senate Leader decides what will be voted upon, even if his Caucus is infiltrated with Scott Brown clones...

I have no love of RINOS, but we can use the analogy that a RINO is just a Democrat when we have a 90(R) / 10 (D) majority in the Senate. When that happens, you can cull the herd without losing control of the Senate Leadership.


27 posted on 04/01/2011 5:50:18 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (Conservatives THINK people are smart. Liberals KNOW people are stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

I think I speak for most FReepers who donated to Brown’s campaign that we most certainly were not played for fools. Each of us knew Brown was no dyed in the wool conservative, perhaps not even a mediocre one, but the time, place and context made it worth the $20 or whatever to see him elected. I have no regrets, and I think anyone who would mock me for “supporting” him at the time seeks only to build himself up as a paragon rather than look at the endgame.

Since I went in with eyes open, Brown hasn’t “disappointed” me in the least. If I could only say the same for other GOPers.


28 posted on 04/01/2011 5:57:49 PM PDT by workerbee (We're not scared, Maobama -- we're pissed off!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
BROWNTOAST
29 posted on 04/01/2011 6:02:04 PM PDT by FrankR (The Evil Are Powerless If The Good Are Unafraid! - R. Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

Good call. When he sees that the support and enthusiasm he had last time isn’t there, I believe that is exactly what he will do. My guess is, the Dems are already courting him.


30 posted on 04/01/2011 6:15:22 PM PDT by Graneros ("The difference between genius and stupidity is; genius has its limits." — Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan
He’s up for reelection next year. He only has a few months to save his senate career ...

He took over from a multi-decades long Kennedy, what more do you want? At least there was an "R" on his ticket..........

Be careful what you wish for because if he loses his next election it will be to another Democrat with a "D" on his ticket.

As I'm sure you're already aware, majority control is based on party affiliation not on how they actually vote.........

31 posted on 04/01/2011 6:16:08 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco (Our technology has surpassed our humanity........AE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe; rabscuttle385; wagglebee; xzins; trisham; wmfights; blue-duncan
Us pro-life Freepers warned all you fiscal non-social conservatives that there is no such thing as a pro-choice conservative. I am not the least bit surprised by Brown’s embrace of social liberalism and big government spending. Scott Brown played all of you for fools. Don’t be surprised if he runs for re-election as a democrat.

A conservative who throws LIFE overboard has just agreed to kill our nation's children.

If they'll do that, they'll throw anything overboard. It's just a matter of time and convenience.

32 posted on 04/01/2011 6:27:11 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain & proud of it: Truly Supporting the Troops means praying for their Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: traditional1

“There’s little benefit in putting in a RINO, just to beat a Democrat.”

Then some Independents blame all Republicans for what the RINOs do, and vote for Dems.


33 posted on 04/01/2011 6:27:29 PM PDT by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative
The “benefit” is having a Majority of 51 + gets you the Senate Leader position. The Senate Leader decides what will be voted upon, even if his Caucus is infiltrated with Scott Brown clones...

At last, one comment reflecting common sense, dealing with reality despite the infantile wish of children for return to the purity of the womb.

34 posted on 04/01/2011 6:29:56 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Told you so.

Now... RECALL this two-faced SOB... Kick his slimy RINO butt to the curb.


35 posted on 04/01/2011 6:38:25 PM PDT by TCH (DON'T BE AN "O-HOLE"! ... DEMAND YOUR STATE ENACT ITS SOVEREIGNTY !When a majority of the American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Hey Cosmo Man; the Tea Party got you elected.


36 posted on 04/01/2011 6:38:41 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco
A couple of points:

1. Brown got elected to vote against Obamacare. Most of us knew that was all we could expect from him (except a few breathless FReeperettes posting his old nude modeling pictures and dreaming of him as VP).

2. We'll have to see how many Massachusetts Republicans will be eager to vote for him again. He has done nothing to endear himself to the same tea party that swept him into office. I doubt he'll be primaried, but if it looks like he will be he'll jump.

3. It's Massachusetts. Brown got elected because enough people were ticked at the idea that the seat was automatic for a really poor candidate and Kennedy pick. Unless we are in the middle of a rebellion that seat will most like go (D), whether that (D) is named Brown or not.

4. I know how control of the Senate works, but our goal can no longer be Republican control. It must be conservative control. Republican control from 1995 until 2007 gave us creeping socialism instead of screaming socialism. A return to creeping socialism is no victory. It's too late. We must have conservatism and that means slash, cut, defund, deregulate. Boehner and McConnell are not up to the job.

37 posted on 04/01/2011 6:42:04 PM PDT by Pan_Yan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Poor Scott Brown. I hate to see you cry.

Scott is finding that Senate thing harder than he figured. How can he make things go easier. So many temptations with so many forces pulling him left and right. What should he do? Should he go left today—or right? I guess the easiest way to decide is to flip a coin.


38 posted on 04/01/2011 6:47:37 PM PDT by jonrick46 (2012 can't come soon enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative; hinckley buzzard
The “benefit” is having a Majority of 51 + gets you the Senate Leader position. The Senate Leader decides what will be voted upon, even if his Caucus is infiltrated with Scott Brown clones...


39 posted on 04/01/2011 6:52:02 PM PDT by Pan_Yan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Carley

“He can hide behind the other girls in the senate, snowe and collins.”

You forgot Graham in your list of girls.


40 posted on 04/01/2011 6:52:02 PM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Made from the right stuff!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson