Posted on 02/06/2011 10:13:14 AM PST by pillut48
"Tourist shoots glowing object hovering over Dome of the Rock." (video)
(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...
SHOOT!!!!! They said “shoot” and didn’t even get called out on it!!!!!
I’ve heard from a reliable FReeper that this is just one of several such recent very similar sightings. Thus the venue has nothing to do with the event
Yes, thats why I put Islamic holy place in air quotes.
Well, then, isn't the Dome of the Rock precisely the place where you would expect such an appearance to occur? I don't see how this is setting up the Jews to blame for something bad happening there; they're kind of already pre-setup, if you see what I mean.
Ping!
Are there other views from other angles?
Paging George Noory, paging George Noory.......
True, true. It just seemed to me *if* something “terrorist” related happened- would Islamofascists blow up one of their own holy mosques to blame Jews worldwide in order to egg on a blood frenzy? I think yes, nothing would surprise me—I just wonder if the mainstream media has started to turn against Israel openly by using this kind of ‘subtle’ (but not so subtly) phrasing.
And if it’s a God thing, well, He’s probably not happy that one of HIS High Holy Places has been occupied by a cult all these centuries, and He’s described how He’ll ‘clean up the place’ when the time comes...has the time come? Jesus said to watch for the signs, and put two and two together...
Yahuweh is NOT Hebrew for lord - Yahuweh is the name God/the Creator=Elohim said we are to address Him by.
His directive is very specific in this matter.
ALL editions of Yahuweh’s scriptures that use the term “Lord” in place of His correct name (7000 times) are doing the very action He warned us NOT to do.
The term “Lord” is Baal's moniker- the history of this distortion is very well recorded.
This fact will be the undoing of Paul's religion as it is in opposition to what Yahuweh has stated in His Scriptures.
If you want to explore this matter I suggest going to YadaYahuweh.com and partake of the translation efforts at corrections to Scriptures that have been provided.
Can’t believe ABC news fell for this hoax.
Hoax exposed: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h5s78wr0UF0&feature=related
Did he use a handgun, or an RPG?
Did it shoot back?
"I find this telling because we should expect the Magog war to begin in 2027 and go nuclear in late 2028 putting the spring 2029 arrival of Apinthos/Apophis right on schedule."
More "Christians are all wrong" date-setting losers.
Yes, it is:
‘elohiym
el-o-heem’
plural of ‘’elowahh’ (433); gods in the ordinary sense; but specifically used (in the plural thus, especially with the article) of the supreme God; occasionally applied by way of deference to magistrates; and sometimes as a superlative:—angels, X exceeding, God (gods)(-dess, -ly), X (very) great, judges, X mighty.
Sorry, should have posted the source: http://www.sacrednamebible.com/kjvstrongs/FRMCONHEB42.htm#S430
Thanks.
Sort of the Royal We, on steroids...
There are several videos of the alleged “Dome of the Rock UFO” posted on YouTube. However, the video which purports to show a close-up of the glowing orb over the Dome of the Rock is almost certainly a fake. The background to the video is exactly the same as an image posted on the Internet. Google “Jerusalem nights 7088” and compare the image side-by-side with the purported video.
Allowing for the fact that the brightness of the image has been increased in the video, and thus some aspects appear more “illuminated,” they are precisely the same. E.g., the glare around the distant lights should change as the video lens pans the scene, but it remains static - and identical to that on the photograph.
Also, if you compare the angles of the buildings in the “Jerusalem nights 7088” photograph with the video, it is evident that they were taken from precisely the same location, once again indicating that the images are one and the same. I lived for years in the Jerusalem area and it looks like the image may have been taken from the King David Hotel, just outside the Old City walls.
Finally, analysis of the video has shown that the image of the Old City is pixelated, indicating that the “video” is actually taken of a digitalized image rather than of the actual Old City.
This is not intended to discount all such paranormal activity, but rather to illustrate that one must not uncritically accept every claimed UFO sighting, especially in the age of Photoshop.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.