Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why the 14th Amendment does not confer citizenship on the children of illegal aliens
House Subcommittee on Immigration and Claims ^ | June 25, 1997 | Prof. Edward J. Erler

Posted on 08/13/2010 3:37:36 PM PDT by La Lydia

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
I attended this hearing. The Dems on the subcommittee were left speechless.

Edward J. Erler Professor of Political Science, California State University, San Bernardino and Senior Fellow, The Claremont Institute for the Study of Statesmanship and Political Philosophy

1 posted on 08/13/2010 3:37:38 PM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

...I’m glad this issue is picking up speed in time for November...it puts the Dems in the position of having to defend “anchor babies”


2 posted on 08/13/2010 3:42:04 PM PDT by STONEWALLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STONEWALLS
...I’m glad this issue is picking up speed in time for November...it puts the Dems in the position of having to defend “anchor babies”

Also Islam.
3 posted on 08/13/2010 3:45:28 PM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

According to Ann Coulter, we have this abomination MISinterpretation of the 14th Amendment, thanks to a FOOTNOTE from Justice Brennan. So, history and the words from those who wrote the dang language of the 14th Amendment got tossed out, all because ONE liberal activist in a black robe decided to say otherwise. Ridiculous!


4 posted on 08/13/2010 3:45:57 PM PDT by Sister_T ("Calling ILLEGAL aliens "immigrants" is like calling shoplifters 'customers'!"-UCFRoadWarrior ><>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

SAVE


5 posted on 08/13/2010 3:46:10 PM PDT by Rumplemeyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia
The Washington elites don't like any of this talk about what constitutes Citizenry, to many folks might start questioning the usuper in chiefs status.
6 posted on 08/13/2010 3:47:43 PM PDT by Las Vegas Ron (People I know have papers for their mongrels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia
The ones that count are those that sit on the Judiciary Committee like Lamar Smith. If the GOP retakes the House then I expect legislation to pass there.

In the Senate it may or may not die but if it does it'll be an issue in 2012. So the open border clowns including Huckabee and Romney can forget about it.

7 posted on 08/13/2010 3:49:14 PM PDT by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron
to = too

Just doing the grammar policing so other FReepers won't have to.

8 posted on 08/13/2010 3:49:35 PM PDT by Las Vegas Ron (People I know have papers for their mongrels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest

Lamar Smith was the subcommittee chair when this testimony was delivered.


9 posted on 08/13/2010 3:51:06 PM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

US CONSTITUTION - Article I - Section 8
The Congress shall have power to:
establish a uniform rule of naturalization, and uniform laws on the subject of bankruptcies throughout the United States.
-
Amendment 14 - Section 5
The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.


As I understand this and other commentary I have read,
congress can simply define citizenship as they may seem fit.
No constitutional amendment is needed; just a congressional bill.


10 posted on 08/13/2010 3:51:40 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th (If November does not turn out well, then beware of December.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sister_T

No one called him on it. He opened the back door and the house was half full of intruders before we became aware of the fact. Pretty much like Hugo Black’s redefinition of thereligious “clauses” of the First Amendment.


11 posted on 08/13/2010 3:53:20 PM PDT by RobbyS (Pray with the suffering souls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

Bump


12 posted on 08/13/2010 3:53:47 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (JUST VOTE THEM OUT! teapartyexpress.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Repeal The 17th

I agree.


13 posted on 08/13/2010 3:54:13 PM PDT by RobbyS (Pray with the suffering souls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia; STARWISE; SE Mom; onyx; maggief; hoosiermama; Liz

Thanks for posting this! Mark Levin talking about it now.

PING!!


14 posted on 08/13/2010 3:55:17 PM PDT by penelopesire (FOX NEWS TRIBAL PRINCESS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuntB; Liz; Tennessee Nana

open borders ping


15 posted on 08/13/2010 3:57:11 PM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STONEWALLS

According to some here, this is the worst time for this to come up. This is an election year, ya know. Can’t have anything that the RATs would use to paint the GOP as racist. If not now, when? The DemocRATs and their allies in the media will continue to paint the GOP, all day, every day at any given time of the year, so that argument doesn’t make an ounce of sense.

Most Americans are opposed to granting birthright citizenship to illegal aliens. Because of the situation in Arizona, this is the perfect time to bring this up and maybe with enough of an outcry, this misinterpretation will end.

Notice, I said, “Maybe”. At least, not with this current Congress.


16 posted on 08/13/2010 3:57:34 PM PDT by Sister_T ("Calling ILLEGAL aliens "immigrants" is like calling shoplifters 'customers'!"-UCFRoadWarrior ><>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

Imagine the bite we could take out of the ‘RATS favorite issue, POVERTY, if we got rid of the Copulating for Citizenship Amendment.


17 posted on 08/13/2010 4:02:36 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (DemocRATS! America's Taliban!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire

Thanks, Pen, just tuned into to Mark.
I think I’ll have to catch is his frst hour replay later tonight!


18 posted on 08/13/2010 4:06:44 PM PDT by onyx (Sarah/Michele 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia
It does not require a constitutional amendment to withhold citizenship from children born in the United States of illegal alien parents. Their parents are not "subject to the jurisdiction" of the United States and they seek citizenship for their children without the consent of the nation. It defies logic to insist that an illegal act on the part of parents can confer the boon of citizenship upon their children. The nation has specified the terms of its consent in the uniform rules for naturalization and laws governing immigration.

Amen.

19 posted on 08/13/2010 4:06:44 PM PDT by GVnana (I'm a Mama Grizzly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia
The Dems on the subcommittee were left speechless

Too much second-class public education.

20 posted on 08/13/2010 4:07:44 PM PDT by GVnana (I'm a Mama Grizzly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson