Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vanity Question
me | today | me

Posted on 06/05/2010 1:28:43 PM PDT by jra

I know some wise FReeper will know this--in all this Sestak/Romanoff talk, they keep referring to whether there was a violation of a law/statute (?) and it sounds like they're saying 'hat check'. I've googled it nine ways to Sunday and I've had no luck. Smart FReepers, unleash your knowledge.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: elections; vanity
Mods, feel free to delete after it gets answered.
1 posted on 06/05/2010 1:28:43 PM PDT by jra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jra

Hatch Act


2 posted on 06/05/2010 1:29:59 PM PDT by socal_parrot (I hate to say I told you so, but...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jra

Hatch Act


3 posted on 06/05/2010 1:30:07 PM PDT by Katnandu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jra

http://www.osc.gov/hatchact.htm

I think that’s it.


4 posted on 06/05/2010 1:30:26 PM PDT by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: socal_parrot

Too easy. The ONE thing I didn’t google.


5 posted on 06/05/2010 1:30:42 PM PDT by jra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jra

I didn’t know either.

I LOVE FR and all smart civil freepers


6 posted on 06/05/2010 1:35:44 PM PDT by RWGinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: socal_parrot

Has anyone asked Hatch if the Hatch Act has been violated?


7 posted on 06/05/2010 1:36:51 PM PDT by IllumiNaughtyByNature (3(0|\|0/\/\1($ 101: (4P174L1$/\/\ R3QU1r3$ (4P174L. Could it be any more simple?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jra

hatch act


8 posted on 06/05/2010 1:38:26 PM PDT by spacejunkie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jra
Don't forget 18 USC 600.
9 posted on 06/05/2010 1:40:56 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("The only stable state is the one in which all men are equal before the law." -- Aristotle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jra

Further Restricted federal employees may not, for example:

campaign for or against a candidate or slate of candidates in partisan elections

make campaign speeches

collect contributions or sell tickets to political fund raising functions

distribute campaign material in partisan elections

organize or manage political rallies or meetings

hold office in political clubs or parties

circulate nominating petitions

work to register voters for partisan voter registration drives

host a political fundraiser

invite anyone to a political fundraiser

accept or receive a donation or contribution for a partisan political party, candidate for partisan political office, or partisan political group

use an official title or position while engaged in political activity

supervisory employees may not invite subordinate employees to political events or otherwise suggest to the subordinate that he or she attend the political event or undertake any partisan political activity

Additionally, while on duty and/or in any federal room or building, Further Restricted federal employees may not, for example:

wear partisan political buttons, t-shirts or other items

make political contributions to a partisan political party, candidate for partisan political office, or partisan political group

post a comment to a blog that advocates for or against a partisan political party, candidate for partisan political office, or partisan political group

use any e-mail account to distribute, send or forward content that advocates for or against a partisan political party, candidate for partisan political office, or partisan political group


10 posted on 06/05/2010 1:41:12 PM PDT by Marty62 (marty60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marty62

Since the audience members at Obama’s town hall meetings are all obviously folks who agree with him, I would consider those events political events. There don’t ever seem to be any conservatives or Republicans present at the town halls.

And making campaign speeches for the likes of Arlan Specter and others appear to be at odds with the restrictions of federal employees. Isn’t the President of the United States a federal employee?


11 posted on 06/05/2010 2:05:52 PM PDT by quintr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: IllumiNaughtyByNature
Has anyone asked Hatch if the Hatch Act has been violated?

Got a ouija board? ;-)

Senator Carl A. Hatch

12 posted on 06/05/2010 2:07:04 PM PDT by mwyounce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: socal_parrot

..long, long, ago in a land far, far, away...
I was accused of violating the Hatch Act, but I was eventually exonerated.
What a pain in the ass that was.


13 posted on 06/05/2010 2:08:10 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th ("...Then conquer we must, when our cause it is just...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: quintr

Don’t forget using AF1 to go to a FUNDRAISER for Boxer.

He is a serial lawbreaker.


14 posted on 06/05/2010 6:49:01 PM PDT by Marty62 (marty60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson