1 posted on
05/23/2010 7:38:52 AM PDT by
nhwingut
To: nhwingut
Same old song and dance, but it’s not working, so change some of the words.
2 posted on
05/23/2010 7:41:00 AM PDT by
YHAOS
(you betcha!)
To: nhwingut
Yes, when you hypothesis turns out to be bullshit, spread it around in a different form. Maybe it will make things grow in other ways.
3 posted on
05/23/2010 7:41:08 AM PDT by
Gaffer
("Profiling: The only profile I need is a chalk outline around their dead ass!")
To: nhwingut
Global WarmingClimate Change
Plan C
4 posted on
05/23/2010 7:41:14 AM PDT by
AU72
To: nhwingut
And it all goes back to Clinton’s definition of “is.”
5 posted on
05/23/2010 7:41:33 AM PDT by
FES0844
To: nhwingut
Liberal commies never give up.
If one approach doesn’t work, they try another.
If that doesn’t work out, they rename their cause or use endless suphemisms.
If they get caught in a lie, they blame somebody else.
This is how commie dictators work the system, game the system and it is done at all of ours expense. Every last one of us. Need I say more.
7 posted on
05/23/2010 7:56:33 AM PDT by
Ev Reeman
To: nhwingut
How will we tell the people the fever, that never was, has been fixed. Will Al Gore do another fiction PowerPoint show with the scissors ladder, explaining how he turned down the wick of the sun?
Why not — Tell them what it all is, since the era of DDT, ozone, ALAR, it’s all been lies and deceit.
There is going to be disappointment in liberal lala land — Until they manage to rid the word of the scourge of the Internet.
8 posted on
05/23/2010 7:59:55 AM PDT by
Tarpon
(Obama-Speak ... the fusion of sophistry and Newspeak. It's not a gift, it's just lies.)
To: nhwingut
You know it’s bad when no matter what it’s called the new name starts to feel tarnished...
9 posted on
05/23/2010 8:01:21 AM PDT by
GOPJ
(...man was meant to be doubtful about himself, but undoubting about the truth-Gilbert K. Chesterton)
To: nhwingut
It's nothing more than a game of rhetorical three-card-monty.
10 posted on
05/23/2010 8:04:40 AM PDT by
Oceander
(The Price of Freedom is Eternal Vigilance -- Thos. Jefferson)
To: nhwingut
No matter what they call it, it’s still...
11 posted on
05/23/2010 8:06:01 AM PDT by
norge
(The amiable dunce is back, wearing a skirt and high heels.)
To: nhwingut
Heh, Climate Change is becoming a dirty phrase...so on to the next global catch all... Geez, when will these creeps finally give it up.
12 posted on
05/23/2010 8:16:32 AM PDT by
Deagle
To: nhwingut
Putting more lipstick on a pig.
When is too much lipstick ever enough?
To: nhwingut
U.N. report suggests dropping climate change in favor of 'saving the natural world (mo taxes)
Man is part of nature; therefore, whatever he does is natural and worthy of saving (that includes intercontinental air traffic, nuclear, coal, and oil-based power, air-conditioning, refrigeration, pesticides, fertilizers, and recombinent DNA technology, to mention a few).
14 posted on
05/23/2010 8:18:45 AM PDT by
aruanan
To: nhwingut
If humans are considered part of nature, then what humans do is natural.
If humans are not considered part of nature, then I volunteer all the libtard whacko “scientists” to be the first to save the “natural” world by departing.
15 posted on
05/23/2010 8:20:28 AM PDT by
CPOSharky
(What outrage will the administration foist upon We the People that will be the last straw?)
To: nhwingut
16 posted on
05/23/2010 8:20:56 AM PDT by
Jack Hydrazine
(It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
To: nhwingut; All
Not that this is specifically related to this thread but this video is a great illustration of the house of cards this whole world "economy" is built on.
In some ways I can't help but think part of this scheme is just a way of creating money from the air we breath making most of us poor and some very rich.
Clarke and Dawes ask the million dollar questions
17 posted on
05/23/2010 8:24:02 AM PDT by
Las Vegas Ron
("Because without America, there is no free world" - Canada Free Press - MSM, where are you?)
To: nhwingut
“Preserve the natural world?”
Schrodinger’s cat, anyone?
19 posted on
05/23/2010 8:29:52 AM PDT by
Dr.Deth
To: nhwingut
Whoa!
"Climate Change" sure had a short half-life!
Will "saving the natural world" last the week?
20 posted on
05/23/2010 9:22:30 AM PDT by
Uncle Miltie
(0bummer calls opponents "Teabaggers". So we can call Kagan "Carpet Muncher." Right?)
To: nhwingut
That's because the whole “climate change” scam was never about the climate or environment. It is a Trojan horse for global wealth redistribution and empowerment of the UN. The sole goal was for to scare wealthy countries into accepting a tax administered by the UN which would be redistributed to poorer countries (after the UN skimmed off a healthy cut). This would have the added effect of giving the UN an independent funding source, so it wouldn't have to beg to the US for funding and give it a foot in the door to create a global police force/army outside the control of any nation.
21 posted on
05/23/2010 9:28:24 AM PDT by
apillar
To: nhwingut
So, will the Goreacle get in on the ground floor for Natural World Credits and Derivatives?
25 posted on
05/23/2010 12:46:06 PM PDT by
algernonpj
(He who pays the piper . . .)
To: nhwingut; Dr. Bogus Pachysandra; Entrepreneur; Darnright; Nipfan; Defendingliberty; ...
27 posted on
05/23/2010 9:48:00 PM PDT by
steelyourfaith
(America should take a mulligan on the 2008 presidential election.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson