Posted on 04/05/2010 11:23:38 AM PDT by a fool in paradise
And the Houston Crime Lad has put many undeserving men and women into prison.
Many have been released, many have sued, many have had their cased thrown out.
Apathy, sure.
But I do realize there are people in prison that were wrongly convicted.
Apathy from guards and prison officials more a problem than my own.
Increase the sentences of those convicted of raping prisoners and throw them in ‘the hole’ for the rest of their sentence, and hang the lifers caught doing it...
So, you are an idiot, and a liberal one who wants to redefine words and lay blame on everyone else if their definition doesn’t fit reality.
If a man has sex with men he is a homo. Period.
You can try to say anyone who thinks differently from you must be a drunken, inbred, redneck, but that just proves your liberal mindset. Only an a liberal equates someone telling them reality with backwoods people. Only a liberal would be so insulting to those they find less educated than them. Only a liberal wants to redefine words because the words they wish to redefine makes them look bad.
You are a liberal. Probably a homo at that.
I agree with the both of you. Even if a prisoner is guilty, I don’t support his rape as a sentence. Ever.
I am for individual cells with a toilet.
I don’t think they’d need kitchenettes, and they could be rotated in and out of exercise yards - no need for a private one.
It could be easily done and I don’t know why we aren’t doing it.
So, to recap, you picked apart the least important point I made, LIBERAL!
Refuse to concede that there are differing definitions for the word you used. — LIBERAL!
“If a man has sex with men he is a homo. Period.” —what if he was raped? Does that make someone a homo? -—hmmm?
“You can try to say anyone who thinks differently from you must be a drunken, inbred, redneck, but that just proves your liberal mindset.” —So you are drunk? That explains your rage a little. (Latent homosexually is not possible, after all look how STRONGLY you disapprove :)
“Only an a liberal equates someone telling them reality with backwoods people.” —you did not address the rest of my post, the ‘reality’ you speak of is almost beside the point. you want to define a word to the exclusion of other defs. You sound angry.
“Only a liberal would be so insulting to those they find less educated than them.” —you must not get out much (not that there is anything wrong with that) Also, it was you who threw around the “IDIOT” labels — twice.
“Only a liberal wants to redefine words because the words they wish to redefine makes them look bad.” You look bad here for harping on a small point and having a hissy fit, I apologize if it is that time of the month, maybe some midol would help.
“You are a liberal.”
-—so you called me that what, 5 times now - sure you are not drunk?
“Probably a homo at that.”
—are you hitting on me?!?
—seriously, you sound like you have your defenses in place for a good reason.
—SO, worry not, if we stick to YOUR definition you are not a homo for being attracted to other men (I know you must be relieved) as long as you do not act on it, right? RIGHT? So have a nice day.
This article alone should help cut the crime rate in half.
There are enough laws to insure that anyone can be discovered to have comitted a crime.
Being good-looking, I would naturally worry about that......haha.
And in the new National government healthcare takeover law...
We are supposed to spend tax dollars to buy erectile dysfunction medications for convicted sex offenders...
Brilliant!!!
LOL! I never get tired of seeing that pic. Thanks for the laugh!
placemark.
Sodomy is always wrong. Forcible sodomy is worse. Anyone who agrees with that kind of wrongdoing under any circumstance is probably someone with homosexual inclinations.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.