Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Large Hadron Atom Smasher Reaches Near Speed of Light
The Daily Galaxy ^ | 3/30/2010 | The Daily Galaxy

Posted on 03/31/2010 12:41:00 AM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld

Scientists celebrated at the world's biggest atom smasher at the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) near Geneva on Tuesday as they started colliding particles at record energy levels mimicking conditions close to the Big Bang, opening a new era in the quest for the secrets of the universe.

The European Organisation for Nuclear Research (CERN) said it had unleashed the unprecedented bursts of energy on the third attempt, as beams of protons thrust around the 27-kilometre (16.8-mile) accelerator collided at close to the speed of light.

"This is physics in the making, the beginning of a new era, we have collisions at 7 TeV (teralectronvolts)," said Paola Catapano, a CERN scientist and spokeswoman, referring to the record energy levels achieved.

This, the third attempt, triggered collisions among the 20 billion protons in the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at 1.06 pm (1106 GMT), creating powerful but microscopic bursts of energy that mimic conditions close to the Big Bang that created the universe.

"We're within a billionth of a second of the Big Bang," CERN spokesman James Gillies told AFP. The new stage, dubbed "First Physics", marks only the beginning of an initial 18- to 24-month series of billions of such collisions.

The LHC, which is located in a tunnel under the Franco-Swiss border, ground to halt with a major breakdown within days of its launch in 2008. But the huge scientific experiment then passed several groundbreaking milestones since it was restarted from repairs last November.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailygalaxy.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: accelerator; atomsmasher; lhc; particlephysics; physics; protons; quantumphysics; science; speedoflight; stringtheory; theoreticalphysics; universe
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last
To: Deagle

Not if you go back to the future.


21 posted on 03/31/2010 1:47:07 AM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: DB

Heh... unfortunately, most science looks to today - little to the future. After all, they do have to attempt to prove their theories with the science of today. Forget about the future - that is for your grandchildren...


22 posted on 03/31/2010 1:51:56 AM PDT by Deagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

Hawking left the Lucasian seat on October last year (just a pedantic FYI).


23 posted on 03/31/2010 1:54:58 AM PDT by Moose Burger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Moose Burger

A great man with physical problems. He has contributed much to science. Hopefully, he will continue while he can...


24 posted on 03/31/2010 2:00:47 AM PDT by Deagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Moose Burger

Thanks for the information.


25 posted on 03/31/2010 2:05:34 AM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld ("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Wernher Von Braun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Deagle

I agree


26 posted on 03/31/2010 2:06:21 AM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld ("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Wernher Von Braun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove
You cannot travel at the speed of light.

I wonder about that. The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle says you cannot know precisely the location of a particle. In principle, there is a finite, albeit remote, possibility for a particle to suddenly be on the other side of the universe. Suppose a particle improving its odds by moving near the speed of light were to occupy a point just ahead of its median position? Then it is beyond the speed of light and off to the races (relative to the observer.) More like the sound barrier then.
27 posted on 03/31/2010 3:16:49 AM PDT by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (IN A SMALL TENT WE JUST STAND CLOSER! * IT'S ISLAM, STUPID! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

Perhaps someone can explain this to this ignorant layman . . .

at the speed of light . . . mass would be in the direction of infinite, right????

So, why wouldn’t the earth start trying to keep that ‘toward infinite’ speck of mass as it’s new center of rotation?

I assume the answer would relate somewhat to the briefness of the flash . . .

however,

it seems to this ignorant layman that even a super brief flash of super massive anything would have some repercussions to the earth’s rotation or wobble or some such????


28 posted on 03/31/2010 3:24:31 AM PDT by Quix (BLOKES who got us where we R: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Deagle
When they get to the speed of light (or over - not that it would not be worthy), let me know...

http://www.physorg.com/news88249076.html

29 posted on 03/31/2010 4:45:16 AM PDT by Thermalseeker (Stop the insanity - Flush Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
-- The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle says you cannot know precisely the location of a particle. --

IIRC, it's that you can't know BOTH, the location, and the momentum/energy.

30 posted on 03/31/2010 4:52:47 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Thermalseeker

Ah yes... Isn’t it interesting that today, there are limitations. Tomorrow, who knows? Speed may very well be restricted as stated by Scientists today - but how about tomorrow? Seems that most of the known facts keep changing - and that is what makes this so much fun...


31 posted on 03/31/2010 4:53:27 AM PDT by Deagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Quix
-- So, why wouldn't the earth start trying to keep that 'toward infinite' speck of mass as it's new center of rotation? --

The mass of a proton at 7 TeV is about 7,460 times the mass of the proton at rest. My guess is that the mass of particles being brought up to speed is on the order of grams per day, maybe pounds. I don't know how much "rest mass" is involved in each collision, but this "supermassive" event is probably like banging a pair of 1 pound weights together, at most. Hardly enough to affect the earth's rotation.

LHC machine outreach FAQ has the "energy to mass" calculation.

32 posted on 03/31/2010 5:03:03 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Ha...there you go, assuming that today’s science is correct. What if much of what you are saying is eventually proven wrong? That is what makes Science so much fun...


33 posted on 03/31/2010 5:07:00 AM PDT by Deagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Deagle
Ah yes... Isn’t it interesting that today, there are limitations

Yep. On October 13, 1947 a lot of people believed that there was a sound "barrier"......

34 posted on 03/31/2010 5:17:22 AM PDT by Thermalseeker (Stop the insanity - Flush Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Quix
-- So, why wouldn't the earth start trying to keep that 'toward infinite' speck of mass as it's new center of rotation? --

The mass of a proton at 7 TeV is about 7,460 times the mass of the proton at rest. My guess is that the mass of particles being brought up to speed is on the order of grams per day, maybe pounds. I don't know how much "rest mass" is involved in each collision, but this "supermassive" event is probably like banging a pair of 1 pound weights together, at most. Hardly enough to affect the earth's rotation.

LHC machine outreach FAQ has the "energy to mass" calculation.

At 7 Tev, mass of 1 proton = Energy/c^2 = 1.2477^-23 Kg

The article notes 20 billion protons, which is unfortunately ambiguous, because a billion US is a thousand million, or 10^9, and in the UK is a million million, or 10^12. Erring on the "heavy" side, use the UK version of billion, each packet has 20*10^12 protons. The number of protons, times the mass of each proton, gives a packet with a mass of about 25*10^-11 Kg, or 25*10^-8 gram.

That's a quarter of a microgram, a quarter of a millionth of a gram, AT SPEED. Rest mass is 1/7,460th of that.

Nevermind that no way do all of the protons collide, only a minute fraction of the 20 billion are involved in collisions, most fly by in near-hit incidents. And too, perhaps the "billion" in the article means 10^9, which results in reducing the mass of the collision by a factor of 1,000.

Even at speed, the mass of material involved in collisions is minute. 0.000 000 250 grams

35 posted on 03/31/2010 5:19:13 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

As always it’s good to watch the live webcams:
http://www.cyriak.co.uk/lhc/lhc-webcams.html


36 posted on 03/31/2010 5:20:43 AM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Deagle
-- there you go, assuming that today's science is correct. What if much of what you are saying is eventually proven wrong? --

Well, that would change everything, of course! It could even change human nature!

But seriously, the observations of rest mass and increasing mass due to obtaining relativistic velocity are nearly perfectly reliable observations. Just like the bill for electricity from running the LHC is going to be "correct" with sufficient precision - they know how much energy is being pumped in, etc.

37 posted on 03/31/2010 5:26:11 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: mainsail that

lol....true


38 posted on 03/31/2010 5:28:50 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide

Problem with that is what constitutes a “particle” is a lot stranger than you think. That line of thinking just doesn’t work that way near such boundary conditions.


39 posted on 03/31/2010 5:30:21 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (+)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove
as they started colliding particles at record energy levels mimicking conditions close to the Big Bang,

What, there was a Large Hadron Collider at the beginning of the universe, and it caused a universal explosion, and now we are trying to replicate it?

40 posted on 03/31/2010 6:02:08 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson