Posted on 03/28/2010 3:37:58 AM PDT by RogerFGay
It is well-known that RealClimate.org is one of the premier websites for global warming scare-mongering. For more than six years, several of the most infamous characters in the global scandal have pumped out politically laden junk science articles attacking skeptics and offering model arguments and defenses for the propaganda effort.The bloggers at RealClimate.org are difficult to satisfy. They play a high pressure game and do not tolerate dissent. They are drowning in their own self-destructive, well over the top nature, and from the looks of it may take many of their followers with them when they finally unceremoniously go under for the last time. In the latest, they have provoked the Guardian into an admittance that damages the newspaper's credibility.
It surprised me to find a blog comment at RealClimate by Dr. James Randerson, the editor of the Guardians environmental website. It wasn't merely that the editor would stoop so low as to participate in the site, it's what he has to say about the Guardian's relationship with RealClimate.org.
I should say first that we hold RealClimate in very high regard. The site is part of the Guardian Environment Network, a collection of more than 20 hand-picked websites including Grist and Natures Climate Feedback blog with whom we have a mutual content sharing agreement. Under the arrangement, the Guardian website republishes RealClimate blogs regularly.I didn't know that. Let me offer some advice to newspapers for their defense when caught using RealClimate.org propaganda. Do not detail your relationship with RealClimate.org and other global warming propaganda sites. To emphasize balanced coverage, no matter how slim, simply say; We're not as bad as the New York Times.Dr. Randerson's RealClimate blog posting : The Guardian responds
Looks like Al Gore new gig will be selling left handed potatoe peelers.
What they are saying is we are not going to change our minds no matter what we discover. As a Geologist, I can tell you that we have always had climate change and man influences climate to a degree, we are insignificant in the term cause...Also, there is nothing that we can do to modify the climate, even if we spent Trillions....
I’d not hold my breath.
I was reading on this board the other day where the official party line is that this was the 5th hottest year (or some crap like that).
I find it breathtaking that climatologists utilize a dead language, e.g., Etruscan, to get their point across. Etruscan is a dead language; nobody knows how to read, write or speak Etruscan.
fake but accurate....
Sarcasm, I take it? I think I’ve see that phrase before, but can’t place it. It’s not familiar enough to me to be sure.
...”I didn’t know that. Let me offer some advice to newspapers for their defense when caught using RealClimate.org propaganda. Do not detail your relationship with RealClimate.org and other global warming propaganda sites. To emphasize balanced coverage, no matter how slim, simply say; We’re not as bad as the New York Times”...
Worth repeating...
Once again, for the idiots who didn’t get it the first three hundred times - there is NO man made global warming.
????
In the last 50,000 years earth has five climate changes remeber the ice ages? man can’t change the weather no matter how much he wishes he could it’s all about a scam for profit and Al Gore is the CEO.
The piece goes on to say that the contents of the emails from UEA do ot upset “two hundred years” of science. Revelations shock me by the minute. I had no idea that people have been studying “climate change” for 200 years, nor did I realize that there was any data more than 50 years old that might support such a claim.
The obvious inference is that I’m just a silly, little peasant. Otherwise we’d have to conclude that they’re lying again.
A liberal rag published "Global Warming" propaganda?
I’ve seen the old science arguments more than once. Apparently, discovery and discussions on the “greenhouse effect” by famous scientists 200 years ago is part of the absolute scientific proof that we’ll all die horrible horrible deaths if we don’t start paying higher taxes and tithing to Al Gore immediately.
As soon as someone takes the time to prove it ain’t so (it’s just too silly for anyone to bother, without any evidence that it has any real propaganda value), they’ll likely go back farther and cite humanoids looking up at the skies as further proof.
But anyways - you can see how it works. Warming propagandists characterize “skeptics” as people who “deny climate” etc. - more to the point, as people who don’t believe the “greenhouse effect” SCIENCE is real, along with not believing that climate changes, etc. So, there are some kids out there trying to convince people that there really is a greenhouse effect - some of them really convinced that it’s an important part of the public discussion - to put the “deniers” in their place.
And never the two shall meet.
RealClimate was put together and funded by $oro$ as a marketing tool for Cap and Tax. They only allow pro Global Fraud posters and deny anybody else.
Pray for America
They should all be jailed for fraud.
They can add it to the stack of Humpties the Obama administration has crashed already.
For some current and past history...I posted this from JoNova:
Roger that E. Seems like all the criminals and in many cases not to bright folks, few being actual engineers, chemists, geologist, astrophysicist types, are now being brought into the light of day....the truth of the matter. And their past actions will now be reviewed by many honest people.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.