Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Time To Wrest The Reins Of Control From Congress - Constitutional Convention ???
3/24/2010 | self

Posted on 03/23/2010 10:12:27 PM PDT by Lmo56

Does anyone think it is time to restore some sense of order to the United States ??? I do.

The two-party system has fostered a climate where legislators have become beholden to their party at the expense of those that they represent - their constituents.

The Constitution is a GREAT document, but it is not perfect. And there are some housekeeping chores that are needed to clean-up some deficiencies in the document. After all, it was written over 200 years ago - and the Founding Fathers could never have imagined the mess we are in now.

However, they did leave us with one thing - the Constitutional Convention. It rips the Constitution out of the hands of Congress and places with the States.

See this link:

http://www.rightsidenews.com/200901133312/editorial/virginia-moving-to-a-new-constitutional-convention.html

I did not post it as the title of this thread, as the author is absolutely AGAINST the Constitutional Convention. He does, however, provide information on its current status.

As of this time, there are 22 states that have called for it, 18 that have never voted for it, and 10 who voted - but later rescinded it.

It only takes 34 states to FORCE Congress to call one. Of the 10 states that rescinded, I think that all 10 would be inclined to re-instate [if only to repeal the healthcare law].

That leaves 2 states of the 18 that have never voted for it to be turned. Kentucky, Ohio, and West Virginia look like candidates to me.

What do you all think ???


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 111th; amendment; bhohealthcare; constitution
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-113 next last
"If called, a modern Constitutional Convention could declare the U.S. Constitution to be null and void, and could completely rewrite the document. For example, former U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice Warren Burger once declared, 'There is no effective way to limit or muzzle the actions of a Constitutional Convention. The Convention could make its own rules and set its own agenda.'"

I'm not calling for total repeal - but Burger's statement shows that a Constitutional Convention WOULD NOT be constrained by Congress.

1 posted on 03/23/2010 10:12:27 PM PDT by Lmo56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lmo56

I didn’t get the thing to hyperlink:

http://www.rightsidenews.com/200901133312/editorial/virginia-moving-to-a-new-constitutional-convention.html


2 posted on 03/23/2010 10:13:43 PM PDT by Lmo56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lmo56
Does anyone think it is time to restore some sense of order to the United States ??? I do.

It is time. I am not sure I want a Constitutional Convention right now. There are too many commies in power who will figure out how to get their way. Let's wait until after the Nov. elections, or after Obama is voted out. A Con Con could work against us at this point in time.

3 posted on 03/23/2010 10:15:46 PM PDT by mlocher (USA is a sovereign nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lmo56
The Constitution is a GREAT document, but it is not perfect. And there are some housekeeping chores that are needed to clean-up some deficiencies in the document. After all, it was written over 200 years ago - and the Founding Fathers could never have imagined the mess we are in now.

What do I think....got lost with this crap jerk.

The Constitution is just fine if it were adhered to, go stir your sh!t up on DU.

4 posted on 03/23/2010 10:15:54 PM PDT by Las Vegas Ron ("Because without America, there is no free world" - Canada Free Press - MSM, where are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lmo56

NO CON-CON!!!

THE CON’’S ARE RUNNING THE ASYLUM.

BESIDES, YOU WILL BE CONNED INTO SOMETHING YOU DON’T WANT!!!!

Kenya Man, Kenya Man,
Does whatever a Kenyan Can...


5 posted on 03/23/2010 10:16:06 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron

LOL!!!

What do you really mean? /s LOL


6 posted on 03/23/2010 10:16:57 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lmo56

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2477434/posts?page=52#52


7 posted on 03/23/2010 10:17:09 PM PDT by Hostage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lmo56

No way Jose. There is nothing wrong with our constitution. A constitutional convention now would just result in the final nail in the coffin for our Republic.


8 posted on 03/23/2010 10:17:16 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vendome; Las Vegas Ron

COMPLETE BS!

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2477434/posts?page=52#52


9 posted on 03/23/2010 10:18:16 PM PDT by Hostage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2477434/posts?page=52#52


10 posted on 03/23/2010 10:18:40 PM PDT by Hostage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lmo56
Before the cart gets ahead of the horse, I would ask one (1) question to the suggestion for a Constitutional convention; With the LEFT (democRATs) holding the House of Representatives, the Senate and the White House, what EVIL could the LEFT (democRATs) inject into the outcome of a Constitutional convention and how would the injection of LEFTIST EVIL be prevented if a convention were called ?


11 posted on 03/23/2010 10:21:11 PM PDT by pyx (Rule#1.The LEFT lies.Rule#2.See Rule#1. IF THE LEFT CONTROLS THE LANGUAGE, IT CONTROLS THE ARGUMENT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lmo56

Having a Constitutional convention in this political climate, with such treasonous people wandering about is like contemplating open heart surgery on a filthy mattress in a feed lot.


12 posted on 03/23/2010 10:23:14 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron
What do I think....got lost with this crap jerk. The Constitution is just fine if it were adhered to, go stir your sh!t up on DU.

Man, you get worked up pretty quickly, huh?

I do tend to agree with you on this subject but come on, is that reaction REALLY necessary?

13 posted on 03/23/2010 10:23:35 PM PDT by softwarecreator (No more excuses ... we need to take our country back. Now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pyx

Because there are not enough liberal states in the union. This is one reason why liberals want to eliminate the electoral college — the extra weighting towards simply being a state skews the results to the right.


14 posted on 03/23/2010 10:23:41 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron

Don’t throw your crap label around. This is an idea. A dangerous idea but an idea.

I would just as soon see the US break up as needed and reformulate later. I am not crazy about the current ‘marriage’. A Con-con has some merits as long as states can form compacts and say ‘enough for now’. We wouldn’t have had a civil war if states had had an opportunity to opt out.

Use your ‘jerk’ and ‘crap’ label on DU yourself.


15 posted on 03/23/2010 10:24:49 PM PDT by wireplay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mlocher

You are right, something needs to be done, but the Con-Con is NOT something we should even be thinking.


16 posted on 03/23/2010 10:25:31 PM PDT by softwarecreator (No more excuses ... we need to take our country back. Now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: softwarecreator

If you are a software whiz why don’t you trace the whole code first? The Con Con does NOT give you a weighted average of states’ opinions. It gives you whatever passed muster with 3/4 of the states. There are a lot of scantily populated conservative states to the west. This is why liberals hate the electoral college, by the way.


17 posted on 03/23/2010 10:27:29 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
Are you suggesting that we have to pass an Amendment to uphold what the Constitution already says?
18 posted on 03/23/2010 10:27:46 PM PDT by Las Vegas Ron ("Because without America, there is no free world" - Canada Free Press - MSM, where are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron

I’d say give the courts a chance first with what we got now (also because Congress is involved in the Con-Con process, we would like at least the House to be Republican) but this is an ace we can stick in our sleeve.


19 posted on 03/23/2010 10:30:10 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

But couldn’t a CC be limited in scope based on the language used to call for it (via the state houses)?


20 posted on 03/23/2010 10:31:26 PM PDT by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-113 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson