To: metmom; DaveLoneRanger; editor-surveyor; betty boop; Alamo-Girl; MrB; GourmetDan; Fichori; ...
To: GodGunsGuts
Was it the Phish CD spotted on Saturn’s coffee table? If so, Saturn just thinks it’s young.
To: GodGunsGuts
Sounds like maybe the rings are just construction debris that hasn’t yet been cleaned up.
4 posted on
05/07/2009 8:27:38 AM PDT by
Atlas Sneezed
(Typical "Rightwing Extremist")
To: GodGunsGuts
Jeff Cuzzi added that if the gravity difference indicated by the simulations was real, it would have propelled some of Saturns moons much farther out and certain rings would have comingled by now. Clearly, the origin and age of Saturns rings has been a riddle for decades, and its riddles remain to be deciphered. Riddles are much more difficult to solve when you begin from the completely wrong conceptual starting point.
To: GodGunsGuts
I have a friend at NASA who says the Casini spacecraft photographed a temple and a man and a woman living there.
It could be the next Adam and Eve.
NASA is covering this up because of the uproar it would cause.
7 posted on
05/07/2009 8:34:31 AM PDT by
staytrue
To: GodGunsGuts
The youthful features of Saturn and its rings are not puzzling at all, considering they were hung in the heavens about 6,000 years ago by the direct action of a Creator. Is this an example of the creation research that is being done? I guess I was under the impression (from you) that creation research involved science.
Creation research, in this case, appears to be more like 'Houston, we have a problem, let's research the answer in the Bible." And then, voila, the very first words "God created the heavens and earth."
Research done and problem solved.
8 posted on
05/07/2009 8:35:16 AM PDT by
dmz
To: GodGunsGuts
Saturn may be young, but with a ring that size, she’s not available...
9 posted on
05/07/2009 8:36:09 AM PDT by
MortMan
(Power without responsibility-the prerogative of the harlot throughout the ages. - Rudyard Kipling)
To: GodGunsGuts
But, but, I thought this science was settled also...
10 posted on
05/07/2009 8:36:52 AM PDT by
LRS
(Just contracts; just laws; just a constitution...)
To: GodGunsGuts
Wow. Too bad the article mentioned nothing about the age of Saturn, but only its rings. And was I the only on to catch that Brian Thomas M.S.* cites an article named Saturn's rings may not be as young as they look?
11 posted on
05/07/2009 8:37:47 AM PDT by
stormer
To: GodGunsGuts
Saturn is Number 1 on this weeks list of hot, sexy, young planets!
13 posted on
05/07/2009 8:40:14 AM PDT by
spodefly
(This is my tag line. There are many like it, but this one is mine.)
To: GodGunsGuts
The youthful features of Saturn and its rings are not puzzling at all, considering they were hung in the heavens about 6,000 years ago by the direct action of a Creator.God as an exterior decorator.
It's also possible that the planet is a few billion years old and the youngish rings and moons are the result of a relatively recent collision of larger moons a few hundred million years ago.
14 posted on
05/07/2009 8:41:26 AM PDT by
dead
To: GodGunsGuts
So according to Brian Thomas, Saturn formed must have formed recently because he doesn’t understand why the rings aren’t shiny?
At least he didn’t major in journalism.
To: GodGunsGuts
The youthful features of Saturn and its rings are not puzzling at all, considering they were hung in the heavens about 6,000 years ago by the direct action of a Creator. Oh dear. I should have read the article before posting my cutesy 'hot young Saturn' photo. I didn't realize what we were dealing with here ...
If everything in the universe is only 6k years old, then why did God try to fool all of us into thinking things are much older? Why were we robbed of that new universe smell?
19 posted on
05/07/2009 8:58:20 AM PDT by
spodefly
(This is my tag line. There are many like it, but this one is mine.)
To: GodGunsGuts
The youthful features of Saturn and its rings are not puzzling at all, considering they were hung in the heavens about 6,000 years ago by the direct action of a Creator.Oh, well, if Brian Thomas at the Institute for Creation Research says so, then it must be so...
21 posted on
05/07/2009 9:02:17 AM PDT by
DTogo
(High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
To: GodGunsGuts
Saturn’s are indeed “young”, but the Lord of GM* has decreed that no more are to be created...
28 posted on
05/07/2009 9:15:15 AM PDT by
mikrofon
(* Government Motors)
To: GodGunsGuts
Three or four of our planets including Earth, Mars, Saturn, and possibly one other have axial tilts set at around 25 degrees off the planet of the system; that’s what you’d expect when a larger system captures a smaller one, rare in the universe but not impossible. The ancient name “El” meant Saturn. All of the myriad biblical names and place names ending in ‘el’ meant something-or-other-Saturn: Isra-el, Rapha-el, Gabra-el, Dani-el... “Babel” meant “Saturn Gate” or something like that.
To: GodGunsGuts
Planetary Quandaries Solved: Saturn Is Young Not.
56 posted on
05/07/2009 2:04:17 PM PDT by
humblegunner
(Where my PIE at, fool?)
To: GodGunsGuts
Wow! These guys really crank out the crap don't they.
Demented delusional Creationist Placemarker.
60 posted on
05/07/2009 2:51:08 PM PDT by
DoctorMichael
(Creationists on the internet: The Ignorant, amplifying the Stupid.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson