To: GodGunsGuts
Wow. Too bad the article mentioned nothing about the age of Saturn, but only its rings. And was I the only on to catch that Brian Thomas M.S.* cites an article named Saturn's rings may not be as young as they look?
11 posted on
05/07/2009 8:37:47 AM PDT by
stormer
To: stormer
Wow. Too bad the article mentioned nothing about the age of Saturn, but only its rings. And was I the only on to catch that Brian Thomas M.S.* cites an article named Saturn's rings may not be as young as they look?
Thats because Brian Thomas M.S.* (Science Writer) surfs the worldwideinterweb for science articles, reads them but doesnt understand them or misinterprets them and then selectively quote mines whatever he thinks might support his 6,000 year old Earth belief.
His writing is more akin to a middle school kid trying to write a term paper for the first time Wow! I have foot notes! Teacher will be so impressed.
Answers in Genesis and Saturn's Rings
22 posted on
05/07/2009 9:03:11 AM PDT by
Caramelgal
(When the past no longer illuminates the future, the spirit walks in darkness.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson