Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McCain Derangement Syndrome
FR | 1-22-08 | Bob J

Posted on 01/22/2009 2:13:10 PM PST by Bob J

There has been much talk of the 8 year BDS (Bush Derangement Syndrome) from the left but I think it's time we admitted there are DS's on the right and we have to look no further than our own backyard here at FR to find the most glaring example, McCain Derangement Syndrome.

McCain wasn't my preferred candidate. In fact, I'd have to go all the way back to Reagan to find my own preferred candidate victorious. But you never get everything you want in politics so many times you have to work with you got and make the best of it. Even if the candidate you supported doesn't get the nod at least you know you'll get some of what you want and on those issues that you disagree you'll at least have a seat at the table and an opportunity to change minds. If the opposing partys candidate wins you'll get almost nothing and a seat at the window looking in.

But the MDS people will have none of this. It's either political purity (THEIR political purity BTW) or nothing. Sometimes they remind me of petulant children threatening to hold their breath until they turn blue unless get what they want. Their virulent acrimony toward McCain is so intense that you couldn't post a thread or talk about McCains positions in an adult manner on FR without them descending on it like a plague of locusts, chanting their relevant but worn out jingoisms, attacking anyone with the temerity to desire a review of McCains +/- positions and poisoning any budding, rational discussion.

Their latest frenzy involves McCains support for closing Gitmo. Now to anyone with a shred of knowledge of McCains position on this it was not a surprise. He has always opposed some of the techniques employed at Gitmo and considering his war experiences at the Hanoi Hilton it was it really a surprise to any of us? Acting like child who just found a shiny new penny on the sidewalk they picked it up, stuffed it in their pockets and are parading around high fiving each other and telling everyone how "we told you so".

Really? Thanks for breaking news, Einstein.

But what I want to touch on here is the deeper ramifications of MDS and what it meant in this election. Bush lost by 7%, 53 to 46 (I believe). That means a 3.5% shift in the vote could have meant the GOP hanging on to the White House and the benefits associated with that, including but not limited to the nomination of Supreme Court Justices.

I saw the influence and impact the MDS group had here on FR and wonder how far that could be extended to the general voting public. The constant barage of anti McCain rhetoric, the calls for supporting a third party, staying home and not voting, not contributing to the GOP or ANY candidate that wasn't ideologically pure (again, by their own definition). How much effect did that have on the election? Was it enough to turn the balance in Obama's favor?

In my opinion it did. There is one thing we know for a certainty...it didn't help.

Generally to a man, the MDS people's hero is Ronald Reagan. But wasn't it RR's mantra to "speak no evil of a fellow republican"? These peoples main criticism of McCain is that he doesn't fall in line with central GOP/conservative orthodoxy and therefore should be opposed at all cost, going so far as calling for his defeat in the next election. But aren't these people engaging in the same actions for which they criticize McCain by not supporting the lawfully nominated and elected representative of the (entire) party for the Presidency?

Their, at best, inconsistent, and at worst sophist hypocrisy contributed to the/our GOP loss in this election and for that they should be called to the carpet at FR. Their jubilent mania associated with McCains announcement about Gitmo, the "I told you so's" and "There isn't a dimes difference between McCain and Obama" are not only intellectually vacuous but offensive considering their track record and hand in allowing the marxist community organizer into the most powerful office in the world.

I urge all FReepers to end your silence when it comes to the MDS people. Tell them what you think, how you feel and why you believe they were instrumental in allowing the greatest attack/defeat for the future of conservatism in the last 50 years.

If not on FR, where? If not you, whom?


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: bobj; coffeemug; conservatism; delphitechnique; derangement; hegeliandialectic; justanothervanity; keychain; kneepadrepublicans; manchuriancandate; mcbama; mccain; mccainiac; mccaintruthfile; mcinsane; mclame; mcqueeg; mcstain; mds; middleoftheroadkill; nevermind; nomorevanities; pap; rallyingrinos; rino; rinonia; rinoparty; rinopurge; rinosonparade; rnc; selfsabotage; sellouts; sniff; strawman; syndrome; thiswentnowhere; uselessallegations; vanity; vichy; vichyrinos
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 401-442 next last

1 posted on 01/22/2009 2:13:11 PM PST by Bob J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Bob J

Screw McQueeg and his little groin leeches.


2 posted on 01/22/2009 2:15:40 PM PST by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

McCain is history. Most here supported him against Obama, but McCain didn’t want to win this thing. He is now back to growel to the Democrats, which is the thing he does best.

Let’s forget him already, he’s done nationally and I doubt he’ll be Senator much longer.


3 posted on 01/22/2009 2:17:21 PM PST by SolidWood (Sarah Palin - America the Beautiful)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
McCain and his little band of RINO flying monkeys can kiss my a**.

And in order to 'speak no ill of a Republican', the person being spoken of would actually have to be a Republican.

McCain ain't.

L

4 posted on 01/22/2009 2:18:15 PM PST by Lurker ("America is at that awkward stage. " Claire Wolfe, call your office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Screw McQueeg and his little groin leeches.

Amen, can't top a perfect post!

5 posted on 01/22/2009 2:18:17 PM PST by Las Vegas Ron (The tree of liberty is getting mighty dry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

I’m guilty. I have a right.


6 posted on 01/22/2009 2:19:29 PM PST by Cyber Liberty (Pretending the Admin Moderator doesn't exist will result in suspension.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
Oh and thanks for cluttering up the forum with another stupid unmarked vanity thread.

L

7 posted on 01/22/2009 2:19:57 PM PST by Lurker ("America is at that awkward stage. " Claire Wolfe, call your office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

Most all of us got in line behind McCain during the election. He still lost. His conduct since then shows that he probably didn’t deserve the support he got then.


8 posted on 01/22/2009 2:20:19 PM PST by ilgipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron

And I was one of those who managed to choke back my bile and vote for the SOB.


9 posted on 01/22/2009 2:21:12 PM PST by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

If you’re saying mccain is deranged, I fully agree. A deranged little turncoat pipsqueak.


10 posted on 01/22/2009 2:21:12 PM PST by San Jacinto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

Bush has 10 time the heart and class that McInsane has in his entire body. He WAS a great man and a hero, that time has long passed.


11 posted on 01/22/2009 2:22:09 PM PST by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

Please. Don’t!


12 posted on 01/22/2009 2:22:10 PM PST by wolfcreek (There is no 2 party system only arrogant Pols and their handlers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

I’m not a McCain basher and have tremendous respect for his record of public service. But...four issues that he continues to support and even champion really make it difficult to defend him, at least for me.

1) Campaign finance reform
2) Closing Gitmo and military tribunals
3) Opposition to so-called torture
4) Illegal immigration and “path to citizenship”

His record on these issues is disgusting.


13 posted on 01/22/2009 2:22:14 PM PST by Big_Monkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

Personally, wish he would croak.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2169680/posts


14 posted on 01/22/2009 2:24:01 PM PST by wolfcreek (There is no 2 party system only arrogant Pols and their handlers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
I voted for McCain and even contributed to his campaign. Now that he has lost, however, the Republican party needs to run fast and far away from RINOs like him. The alternative is to accommodate liberal Republicans in core ideology and keep losing elections. We lost in 2006 and 2008 because Washington Republicans were too much like McCain, and not enough like Reagan.

I'm all for bashing ideology that makes us lose.

15 posted on 01/22/2009 2:25:07 PM PST by GOP_Party_Animal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

“And I was one of those who managed to choke back my bile and vote for the SOB.”

As one of the main characters in MDS for months and months, and AFTER you probably convinced hundreds or thousands to NOT vote for McCain and suspend any financial contributions, you’re attempt to whitewash your actions by claiming to have voted for McCain is not only infantile, but absurd.

People call this the stupid party and you are the poster child.


16 posted on 01/22/2009 2:26:07 PM PST by Bob J ("For every 1000 hacking at the branches of evil, one strikes at it's root.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

Her’s why we keep moving leftward toward bigger and more intrusive government no matter who wins: Democrats choose the least acceptable candidate that they can support while Republicans chose the least UNacceptable candidate.
And here we are being told that we should somehow be sweeter toward McCain. Count me out. Until Republicans go on the offense instead of only playing defense (at best) we are lost. Go radical or go home.


17 posted on 01/22/2009 2:26:34 PM PST by all the best
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek

It needs to be done.


18 posted on 01/22/2009 2:27:09 PM PST by Bob J ("For every 1000 hacking at the branches of evil, one strikes at it's root.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Bob J; Admin Moderator

I held my nose and voted for his running mate, but everything his detractors said turned out to be true in spades. We need to ban his name here, so we can forget and move on.

Let’s start with zotting this thread


19 posted on 01/22/2009 2:27:54 PM PST by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

Huh? I don’t get it, attacking McCain when he acts like a liberal (which is a LOT) is somehow a defeat for Conservatism?

The general election is over, now is the time to start house-cleaning. Many (most?) of us bit our tongues and voted for McCain because either Palin or to vote against Bambi, but now, McCain isn’t running and the last election is proof we need to get back to our values. These are the times we do that.


20 posted on 01/22/2009 2:28:05 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

Maybe I should change the question, what has McCain done to advance Conservatism, both in principle and in the electorate?

When people start saying he starts hurricanes, then you can call it McCain derangement syndrome- but calling out liberal legislation and actions is simple political opinion.


21 posted on 01/22/2009 2:29:46 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

McCain isn’t worthy of a thread on FR. Sarah was his best part, and he couldn’t wait to throw her under the bus. Forget him already. He’s a card-carrying liberal.


22 posted on 01/22/2009 2:30:15 PM PST by informavoracious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

I agree with your sentiment....conservatives are going to have to accept more moderates or become totally irrelevant (politically).

However, McCain is not the place to start. If I never hear that POS again it would be too soon, but with him brown nosing Obama, I’m sure he’ll be in the news everday.

The difference between BDS and MDS is that McCain deserves it.


23 posted on 01/22/2009 2:30:55 PM PST by A.Hun (Common sense is no longer common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
I urge all FReepers to end your silence when it comes to the MDS people.

How's that working out for you, Bob?

Welcome to "I Love McCainville". Population: You.

24 posted on 01/22/2009 2:31:06 PM PST by San Jacinto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
And I was one of those who managed to choke back my bile and vote for the SOB.

Same here, but I look at it this way, I gave him my vote, can't bring myself to say I voted for him.

25 posted on 01/22/2009 2:31:47 PM PST by Las Vegas Ron (The tree of liberty is getting mighty dry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

IMHO, I don’t think we need to ban his name, instead, we should call him out just like we do those who are like minded such as Barney Frank, Chuck Schumer, Barack Obama, etc. No better, no worse..


26 posted on 01/22/2009 2:32:31 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
"Maybe I should change the question, what has McCain done to advance Conservatism, both in principle and in the electorate?"

Uhh he almost single-handedly dismantled conservatism in america?

27 posted on 01/22/2009 2:32:50 PM PST by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

I disliked McCain from the beginning, and wasn’t going to vote for him until he named Sarah Palin as his running mate. I know there were plenty of others on this site like me, who only voted for him because of Palin. If, according to your opinion, I have MDS, so be it. I’ll tell you one thing, I will never, ever vote again for a RINO the GOP names as its Presidential nominee. Even if they choose a bona fide Conservative as their VP running mate, I will NEVER cast a ballot ever again for a RINO!! And those weak-kneed Freepers who whined and cried that we had to vote for McCain because he was our only choice had better steer clear of us in the future, because I doubt they will be treated fairly by those of us who relented and voted for puke.


28 posted on 01/22/2009 2:33:27 PM PST by mass55th (Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway...John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
Sorry, you can't say that, it is MDS even if completely true...
/sarc
29 posted on 01/22/2009 2:34:12 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Big_Monkey
McCain was actually a patriotic American when Ronald Reagan first campaigned in his behalf to help him win Barry Goldwater's seat. However, about the time of the Keating 5 scandal, he became more concerned with pleasing the media than with pleasing his constituents. It went downhill from there. He became as the Apostle Paul described in his 2nd Epistle to Timothy: (II Tim. 3:4)Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God;

I had hoped that his selection of Sarah Palin in September would put him back on the path to righteousness. But, alas, he only used her in a futile attempt to get her to drag him over the finish line.

Now that Oba Mao has been crowned, he can't wait to become the same nasty McCain who put media approval ahead of what is best for the country. To paraphrase our former vice-president-- f*** him and the horse he rode in on.

30 posted on 01/22/2009 2:34:16 PM PST by Vigilanteman (Are there any men left in Washington? Or, are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Bob J; rabscuttle385

I’d actually call your thread ‘McCain-IAC Derangement Syndrome’...because the guy you are defending so vigorously has succeeded in completely dissolving the base and setting the GOP back decades...

Bump to rabs!


31 posted on 01/22/2009 2:34:16 PM PST by bamahead (Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
It's either political purity (THEIR political purity BTW) or nothing. Sometimes they remind me of petulant children threatening to hold their breath until they turn blue unless get what they want.

Oh yeah, I remember you. You're one of the libtards in training who said, "you go right ahead and hold onto your precious principles!" 

Now that's what I call infantile rage. 

32 posted on 01/22/2009 2:36:44 PM PST by JoJo Gunn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
Bob, do we have to explain it to you and others for the millionth time why we hate McCain? Do you want me to write this using children alphabet building blocks so you can comprehend?

Who are the real derangement syndrome sufferers here? How many times where wary conservatives told by the establishment to vote for McCain or else?

How many times have McCain stabbed conservatives in the back, reached across the aisle to Democrats, and criticized other Republicans (NC GOP ad) for being too mean?

What did McCain do when FINALLY conservatives began supporting him because of his brilliant Palin pick. He didn't go after Obama hard, he "suspended" his campaign to do business as usual in Washington supporting the bail-out for rich financiers (which cost him his campaign) and threw Palin under the bus after his defeat.

Now he's back to his usual business - is it any surprise you're going to see conservatives upset about McCain?

I don't care if McCain was your 3rd, 4th, or 100,000th pick. He got nominated by cross-over Dems and independents. If this happens again in 2012 (and McCain is open to running again in 2012) do you think conservatives are going to cheerfully hold their noses again and vote for him?

Dude, get a clue. We're not sheep OK?

33 posted on 01/22/2009 2:37:16 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (The Libertarian and Constitution Parties should merge into one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun
I agree with your sentiment....conservatives are going to have to accept more moderates or become totally irrelevant

Q.What is the definition of a moderate?

A. A spineless wannabe conservative (in nname only)

34 posted on 01/22/2009 2:37:16 PM PST by Las Vegas Ron (The tree of liberty is getting mighty dry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

Why? McCain (I’m being nice) has done nothing but stab us in the back. (I doubt you’ll get many if any postive posts)

I’m willing to never mention his name again if he would just retire.


35 posted on 01/22/2009 2:37:33 PM PST by wolfcreek (There is no 2 party system only arrogant Pols and their handlers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

Bush lost by 7%, 53 to 46 (I believe).


How interesting that in a vanity about MDS you make that mistake in names...Freudian slip or just a way to say it’s Bushs fault? Palin is the only reason my voting record is still at 100% participation. Go peddle your defense of the old guy somewhere else.


36 posted on 01/22/2009 2:38:15 PM PST by crazyhorse691 (Obama is Americas new Forrest Gump...but with an oversized ego and ears.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron
And I was one of those who managed to choke back my bile and vote for the SOB.

Well, I voted a straight Rebublican ticket, but the only one at the top who I voted for was Palin.

37 posted on 01/22/2009 2:38:15 PM PST by San Jacinto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
We could even make this a McCain tribute thread.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
38 posted on 01/22/2009 2:38:27 PM PST by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron
And I was one of those who managed to choke back my bile and vote for the SOB.

Well, I voted a straight Republican ticket, but the only one at the top who I voted for was Palin.

39 posted on 01/22/2009 2:39:12 PM PST by San Jacinto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

“Bush lost by 7%, 53 to 46 (I believe).”

Uh...I don’t think so...


40 posted on 01/22/2009 2:39:21 PM PST by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun; Bob J
conservatives are going to have to accept more moderates or become totally irrelevant

How has that ever helped us? Conservatives are best when they foster Conservative values- the power of the individual. When was the last time you've heard a Republican really talk about what the individual can do in spite of the government? When was the last time you heard a Republican lift up people and say get government out of your way and you can accomplish anything? When was the last time you heard a Republican talk about the greatness of this country? The last time we had all of these was Reagan. Instead, you may get bits and pieces from some candidates, but most just have another version of "I'm from the government and I'm here to help"...

People have become addicted, we don't need moderates, that is like staying a nursing baby politically, we need to empower people and lift them up, not through government promises but by showing them they have the power over their lives.

41 posted on 01/22/2009 2:39:40 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
groin leeches   

 

Apparently McCain is still giving out coffee mugs and key chains

42 posted on 01/22/2009 2:42:10 PM PST by JoJo Gunn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

Sorry. I voted for McCain and supported his campaign and worked 5 or 6 days a week in the last 4 weeks before the election but he has gone out of his way to prove just what a vindictive, self absorbed, backstabbing little bastard he really is. He and his houseboy Lindsey Graham make me sick. The way he stood by and let his campaign savage Sarah Palin made me sick. Now he’s waving the pom poms for Obama! I’ll never support the man again and I’ll never admonish anyone who ever criticizes him.


43 posted on 01/22/2009 2:42:44 PM PST by pgkdan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
Here ya go, bob. Since you're in the mood to use your mouth, why don'tcha take the Greyhound to Washington and lend McCain some oral support. Take these kneepads, by the time you're done "respecting" McLame and all the other RINOs your knees are gonna get a thorough workout.


44 posted on 01/22/2009 2:43:15 PM PST by Nervous Tick (I've left Cynical City... bound for Jaded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

John McCain, and anybody who dares to defend him, are enemies to our Republic and our civil rights and liberties.

Choke on it, Boob.


45 posted on 01/22/2009 2:44:50 PM PST by CounterCounterCulture (RINOs: the enemy within)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: San Jacinto
Well, I voted a straight Republican ticket, but the only one at the top who I voted for was Palin.

I actually considered not giving my vote to McCain until he picked Palin.

Now that it's over, I wish I had stuck to my original plan.

46 posted on 01/22/2009 2:44:56 PM PST by Las Vegas Ron (The tree of liberty is getting mighty dry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
But the MDS people will have none of this. It's either political purity (THEIR political purity BTW) or nothing. Sometimes they remind me of petulant children threatening to hold their breath until they turn blue unless get what they want. Their virulent acrimony toward McCain is so intense that you couldn't post a thread or talk about McCains positions in an adult manner on FR without them descending on it like a plague of locusts, chanting their relevant but worn out jingoisms, attacking anyone with the temerity to desire a review of McCains +/- positions and poisoning any budding, rational discussion.

Actually it was worse than this, and in some threads the same BS goes on today!!

47 posted on 01/22/2009 2:45:53 PM PST by org.whodat (Conservatives don't vote for Bailouts for Super-Rich Bankers! Republicans do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
I believe most of the anger towards McCain is directed at him because he lost the election. Similarly, Bob Dole was not a popular figure in the Republican Party until some years after his defeat.

McCain was nominated by Republicans because we knew that a conservative like a Tom Tancredo (on immigration), a Ron Paul (on economics), or even a flipped flopped conservative like Mitt Romney would get routed by Clinton or Obama. This theory held some credence when, after McCain picked Sarah Palin, the most popular governor in the country, he was leading Obama by 3 points.

So why did McCain lose? McCain did not lose because of Sarah Palin (most people here on FR understand this). Sarah Palin gave the bounce that McCain needed in August, but it was unreasonable to expect that a Vice Presidential nominee, especially a nominee who refused to change her positions to fit the winds of the time (like a Joe Lieberman), could singlehandedly win the election for the party.

McCain lost because he was too attached to the failed Bush economic policies in 2008, specifically the bank bailouts. Had he come out against the bailout, he would have won the election.

48 posted on 01/22/2009 2:47:36 PM PST by WheresMyBailout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: San Jacinto; Bob J
Here's another reason why I'm glad McCain lost. He would have completely ruined Palin's career. Palin would have been VP doing virtually nothing, going to token ceremoniess and funerals, and would have gotten weighed down by McCain. By the time 2012 rolled around, she would have been totally tied to McCain's shenanigans, having to defend his global warming, amnesty for illegals, globalism, etc crap that would have made her poisonous to conservatives, and even then we would have to assume that McCain wasn't going to run for a 2nd term to begin with. If McCain would have ran for a 2nd term in 2012 he would have completely lost, he would be in his mid-70s and the Dems would attack him.

We learned our lesson with McCain. This was a good loss whereas conservatism can be energized without the weight of a moderate McCain administration.

49 posted on 01/22/2009 2:48:12 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (The Libertarian and Constitution Parties should merge into one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
Excuse me. Where have you been the past 8 years. Lord McCain was front and center on chrissy’s lap planting and pushing hate Bush.

I said I would NEVER vote for this turkey, but yet I held my peace after he got the moderate, social liberal, independents vote to grasp that nomination.

And went and begged his campaign for signs to put in my front lawn. And encouraged everybody I came in contact with to vote for him and Sarah. And I took my family and I went and voted because I knew what it would mean for a Bama win.... But I am NOT going to be insulted or accused of having a derangement syndrome over some liberal loving old man who could not figure out how to present what was at stake in order to win an election.

McCain lost because he did not really want to win, he took a liberal’s word about how campaigns would be financed after he gave the keys to the kingdom to the liberals in his get back at conservatives reform of campaign financing....

Please, your screen name use to have credibility to me when I came across something you had to say but NO MORE!!!!!

50 posted on 01/22/2009 2:48:47 PM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 401-442 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson