Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The game's afoot, Watson!( SCOTUS Process Obama Proof of Birth)
The Obama File Latest News ^ | 11/20/08 | Beckwith

Posted on 11/20/2008 8:28:49 AM PST by Candor7

On December 5, 2008, only ten days before the electoral college votes, the nine Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court will meet in private to review Obama's citizenship status.

Leo Donofrio's case, "Leo C. Donofrio, v. Nina Mitchell Wells, Secretary of State of the State of New Jersey, United States Supreme Court Docket No. 08A407," regarding Obama's citizenship has reached a new level. The case has been "distributed for conference."

This docketing today by the court should send ripples of fear through the Obama camp. Obama has been proceeding at lightening speed to put together a cabinet and take possession of the White House with the hope that he won't have to answer the question of whether or not he was "at birth" a "natural born citizen."

Every major news network, print and cable news like FOX, CNN and MSNBC, have ignored all the court cases challenging Obama's eligibility as sore losers or conspiracy theories. It might be in their best interest at this point to report this critically important meeting to take place on December 5, 2008, or lose what little credibility they have left.

If four of the nine Justices vote to hear the case in full review, oral argument may be ordered. The conference is scheduled for December 5, 2008, ten days before the meeting of the Electoral College…

The case originally sought, pre-election, to have the names of Barack Obama, John McCain, and Roger Calero removed from New Jersey ballots, and for a stay of the "national election" pending Supreme Court review of whether those candidates were eligible under the Constitution as natural born Citizens, as is required by Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution of the United States.

Leo Donofrio brought his case from a lower New Jersey court to the NJ Supreme Court -- was denied -- and then he filed an emergency stay application in the United States Supreme Court on Nov. 3, 2008, before the Honorable Associate Justice David Souter. Justice Souter denied the emergency stay application on Nov. 6.

Leo Donofrio renewed the application, as per Supreme Court Rule 22.4, to the Honorable Associate Justice Clarence Thomas by way of Express mail on Nov. 14. The application arrived at the Supreme Court on Nov. 17 and was submitted directly to Justice Thomas.

On Nov. 19, the case was docketed for full conference of all nine Justices and scheduled for December 5, 2008. It is not known at this time the exact details of how the case came to be "DISTRIBUTED for Conference".

Background on "The Justices Conference" is discussed as follows by the Supreme Court Historical Society:

"No outsider enters the room during conference. The junior Associate Justice acts as "doorkeeper," sending for reference material, for instance, and receiving it at the door...

Five minutes before conference time, 9:30 or 10 a.m., the Justices are summoned. They exchange ritual handshakes and settle down at the long table. The Chief sits at the east end; the other Justices sit at places they have chosen in order of their seniority…

The Chief Justice opens the discussion, summarizing each case. The senior Associate Justice speaks next, and comment passes down the line. To be accepted for review, a case needs only four votes, fewer than the majority required for a decision on the case itself. Counsel for the litigants are directed to submit their printed briefs so that each Justice has a set several weeks before argument.


TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections; US: Hawaii
KEYWORDS: bho2008; birthcertificate; birthcertificategate; certifigate; colb; conference; madeinkenya; notmadeinusa; obama; obamatransitionfile; obamatruthfile; process; scotus; thomas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 321 next last
To: Windflier

“Repeat after me: It’s All Bush’s Fault! “

No, now it is Zero’s Fault!!!!


121 posted on 11/20/2008 11:58:29 AM PST by blf1776 (Compassionate Conservatism Is Dead - It is time to fight, fight, FIGHT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: blf1776
No, now it is Zero’s Fault!!!!

Some will argue that Zero is Bush's fault.

122 posted on 11/20/2008 12:01:10 PM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
My understanding... Our votes on November 4th only selected the Electors, so the real votes for President and Vice-President have yet to be cast. If Obama were to be declared ineligible before January 8th (the day of the real vote) then really nothing changes, except the Electors cannot cast a vote for Obama. They can choose anyone they want, really. I'm suggesting that since the vast majority of them are there to vote for Obama they would never vote for McCain, but would most likely vote for Biden. I have a hard time seeing them vote for Hillary.

That's my opinion. I could be wrong.

123 posted on 11/20/2008 12:34:11 PM PST by ItsForTheChildren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

Oops. January 8th should be December 15th.


124 posted on 11/20/2008 12:37:29 PM PST by ItsForTheChildren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Usually SCOTUS tries to avoid controversial decisions that will lead to political firestorms.

Insofar as they do, sometimes they're faced with a firestorm whichever way they go. If the "natural born" question isn't resolved by January 20, it will continue to accumulate speed & hysteria, and a growing number of citizens will have reason to question the administration's legitimacy - with easily dire consequences. Firestorm now, or firestorm later - some choice.

125 posted on 11/20/2008 12:45:48 PM PST by ctdonath2 (I AM JOE THE PLUMBER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ItsForTheChildren
Another FReeper posted that Obama chose his electors from the party faithful so they wouldn't be McCain supporters and it's doubtful they'd choose Hillary although they could. I don't see how Biden could be chosen as he was picked by Obama and ran for VP, not Prez. And if Obama is found ineligible, is his VP pick also ineligible? Are his electors ineligible to vote if the Dems knowingly ran someone that didn't qualify?

Aren't the ins and outs of this fascinating?

126 posted on 11/20/2008 1:07:38 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

To paraphrase Al-Zawahiri, Biden is the real “house negro” if you take that phrase at a literal sense.

I said when Biden was picked as VP candidate that he was on the ticket because of one reason - he’s the token white “WASP” guy.


127 posted on 11/20/2008 1:26:24 PM PST by Free America52
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: ReignOfError

So does it all boil down to “jurisdiction.” Do you think SPOTUS will say they do not have “jurisdiction” here? I don’t think they will do this here.

Although if the Secretary of State did their job in each state and verified maybe we wouldn’t have needed to go to the SPOTUS.

I think the “natural born” issue is what it boils down to and not the actual original birth certificate. Leo Donofrio discussed it in great detail on Plain Radio a few days ago.


128 posted on 11/20/2008 1:29:53 PM PST by joygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
As I understand it the Electors aren't really bound to vote for any particular person and can choose to vote for anyone who is eligible. Since they are picked by the party and are known to solidly back the "winner" of the popular vote the conclusion is foregone.

Now, if the "winner" is suddenly declared ineligible... well, then it gets interesting.

What I find hard to believe is that someone has gotten this far along in the process without his eligibility being absolutely, beyond question, 100% verified.

129 posted on 11/20/2008 1:53:11 PM PST by ItsForTheChildren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot
Naturalized yes, Natural born, no.

And how do you determine naturalization laws without first defining natural born? Especially since the Constitution itself doesn't do so?

130 posted on 11/20/2008 2:03:25 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: ItsForTheChildren
As I understand it the Electors aren't really bound to vote for any particular person and can choose to vote for anyone who is eligible.

Well, not really.

List of Electors Bound by State Law and Pledges, as of November 2000

and

Must electors vote for the candidate who won their State's popular vote?

The Supreme Court has held that the Constitution does not require that electors be completely free to act as they choose and therefore, political parties may extract pledges from electors to vote for the parties' nominees. Some State laws provide that so-called "faithless electors" may be subject to fines or may be disqualified for casting an invalid vote and be replaced by a substitute elector.

A problem is that Obama isn't the President-Elect until Dec 15th so the Constitution is mum on what the procedure is right now.

I agree. If the guy is ineligible it's amazing that he's gotten this far. His Illinois law license stated "no alias". But he was Barry Soetoro in Indonesia. No one even checked back then. Then again, what am I thinking? Illniois vet someone?!

131 posted on 11/20/2008 2:05:47 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Free America52

Wonder if Biden minded being the “token white”?


132 posted on 11/20/2008 2:06:55 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: SFR

They exchange ritual handshakes
what the heck?

____________________________________

After Obammie takes office......

They exchange ritual fist bumps.


133 posted on 11/20/2008 2:28:59 PM PST by Responsibility2nd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ReignOfError

If the Brethren were so inclined, they could finesse it under the Commerce Clause. Ghu knows there’s enough precedent, and this time for once they’d be doing it for the right reason.


134 posted on 11/20/2008 2:34:17 PM PST by Tenniel2 (Obama delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
And how do you determine naturalization laws without first defining natural born? Especially since the Constitution itself doesn't do so?

Ah, I think the term natural born just means citizen at birth -- born as a natural citizen.

Anyone that is naturalized becomes a citizen but wasn't born one.

135 posted on 11/20/2008 2:38:08 PM PST by mc6809e
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: mc6809e
Ah, I think the term natural born just means citizen at birth -- born as a natural citizen.

Agreed. And Congress has determined who is a natural born citizen. The applicable law has been posted many times.

136 posted on 11/20/2008 2:42:02 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

Biden was probably too giddy to be considered for VP to even realize that he was just being used.


137 posted on 11/20/2008 2:45:44 PM PST by Free America52
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
Thanks for the links and the education.

Any way you look at it it's gonna be an interesting few weeks. I'm glad SCOTUS at least decided to take a look at it. Seems to me that if there's ever a question about anyone's eligibility it needs to be investigated. Shoot, file a legal birth certificate when you file to run. Then we can check the age requirement, too.

138 posted on 11/20/2008 2:50:22 PM PST by ItsForTheChildren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Free America52

For Biden it was a resurrected dream.


139 posted on 11/20/2008 2:59:38 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: ItsForTheChildren
You're welcome. I love poking around and finding interesting stuff.

It will be very interesting to see what SCOTUS does and their reasoning behind any action. Or inaction. And I wish that from now on anyone running for office needed to file a BC. I am amazed that they don't have to.

140 posted on 11/20/2008 3:04:01 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 321 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson