Posted on 11/16/2008 6:49:37 AM PST by Kaslin
Is the United States about to face a constitutional challenge?
As we near completion of the first two weeks since Barack Obamas election to the presidency, the path is being established for what I believe could be a serious challenge to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, and the right to free speech that is protected therein. Any American who cares about such freedoms should be watching and listening very carefully. Unfortunately, it appears to me that most Americans are not.
As of late, much attention has been paid to the possibility of our federal government re-instating the so-called Fairness Doctrine, a regulatory policy that, earlier last century, required federally licensed broadcast outlets to present important and controversial subjects in a balanced and equitable fashion. The lifting of this regulation allowed for entertaining, highly opinionated, individual hosts to proliferate, thus giving rise to the media genre we know as conservative talk radio (it has also allowed for the emergence of liberal talk radio, although thus far this genre has not been as commercially successful as its conservative counterpart).
On June 29th of this year, I authored a column wherein I suggested that the antiquated Fairness Doctrine might be the least of our concerns. I further surmised that a President Obama and a Democratically controlled Congress may pursue something I termed comprehensive media reform - - a much broader, all-inclusive attempt to more fully regulate media content and ownership. I believe the stage is now set for such an effort. Im imagining a rather sophisticated public relations campaign that would play out in the context of experts testifying before the next Congress, and research that would be reviewed in congressional investigations.
I envision something on the order of what the Clinton Administration and the Democratically controlled Congress did to tobacco companies back in the 90s, only with broadcasting executives, and perhaps owners of web-based media outlets, being subpoenaed to answer questions under sworn oath.
Some will object to this comparison, given that tobacco is a verifiably dangerous product, and opinion based media is constitutionally protected. But Im not assuming that factual truth, or constitutionality, matter to members of Congress.
Washington politicians have over the years very successfully demonized American industries that they dont like - - both the tobacco and oil industries come to mind - - and have not only tarnished the ways in which those industries are viewed by millions of Americans, but have also achieved a wide array of concessions from those industries. Media owners, especially those who dare distribute conservative content, now need to be fully aware that their turn on Capitol Hill might be next.
Some of the testimony and research to be dramatized in the coming congressional show has already begun to emerge. For example, on September 30th of this year, Reuters news service published a report suggesting that conservative talk radio led to the initial failure of the calamity-preventing Wall Street bail out bill in the U.S. House. The article further suggested that Rush Limbaughs criticism of the bill caused stocks to take a beating and drove the world closer to global economic collapse, while syndicated talker Neal Boortz exacerbated matters by suggesting that more time was needed to allow the bill to flesh itself out.
Last week, new media took a hit as domestic terrorist-turned university professor William Ayers, in his much anticipated interview on ABC-TVs Good Morning America, explained-away both his terrorist background AND his personal friendship with President-elect Obama. Why did he wait until after the election to answer questions about he and Obama? Because, he explained, he didnt want to give credence to the dishonest narrative that was being spread around about him by internet bloggers.
Additionally, Ayers claimed in a written essay last week that John McCain didnt participate in that dishonest narrative that tied Obama to his terrorist past, until McCain did a one-on-one interview with Sean Hannity. From there, the presidential campaign turned vitriolic - - all because of Hannity and the Fox Newschannel.
Additionally, Media Matters, a liberal, Washington, DC-based think tank group has for some time been compiling and publishing research on both local and national conservative talk radio hosts. Last week, Media Matters released a report documenting how conservative radios vitriol has not been reserved for Obama, and has targeted women, minorities, immigrants, and autistic children.
None of the incidents that they sight rise to the level of libel, or would be legally actionable, and are all based on individual hosts opinions. Yet they are nonetheless characterized as attacks that are intended to foment hate and suspicion.
The Fairness Doctrine, as it was once known, may or may not be on the horizon. But a plea to "stop the hate" is almost certainly in the works, and a call for media reform will necessarily follow.
Constitutionally protected free speech doesnt matter nearly as much as peoples ability to create perceptions about that speech, and the stage is set for a full-scale demonization of conservative talk media on Capitol Hill.
MEDA?
If there are still any conservatives left in the future, we will be reduced to having to communicate with one another using untraceable phantom web-access means similar to the ‘throwaway’ cellphones terriorists now use.
The author is looking to the Clinton years for insight. A more appropriate source would be Chavez in Venezuela or Castro in Cuba.
.... maybe we should all start reporting our guns as “stolen”???
The idiots on the right who assume that the constitution and the courts will protect their free speech are in for a rude awakening.
The left has demonstrated an understanding that control of the message is vital to maintain power, that why Putin has journalists shot, Chavez closes down TV stations and HUSSEIN kicks reporters off his plane from newspapers who endorsed his opponent.
The GOP is absolutely clueless and has allowed the socialist press to topple them from the majority.
Now the socialist crook HUSSEIN and his comrades will do what it takes to make the GOP minority permanent.
And, if they don't survive, the future of this country is forever changed.
exactly, okie
McCain kicked the Dallas Morning News off his plane too.
With that said, I get worried when anyone starts talking about the government installing fairness or the common good. It usually means they are going to try to take away from someone instead of raising the others up.
btt
If you think the (Un)Fairness Doctrine will be reinstituted, then put your money into satellite radio.
I am getting sick of crybaby pseudo-conservatives who love to complain. They forget that the difference between liberals and conservatives is that we get things done while they whine. If you cannot adapt and overcome, then you will be left in the dustbin of history.
If the Gipper knew what was going on here he would be spinning in his grave.
Only if you've been foolish enough to register them. Then you will have filed a false police report, a felony.
Anything BO would do would that would make a new CW likely to happen.
...And the seeds for a new bloody civil war will result.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.